Tri Indah Winarni
Center for Biomedical Research (CEBIOR), Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Factors influencing illness uncertainty in parents of children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia in a developing country: A cross-sectional study Irene Astrid Larasati; Fanti Saktini; Tri Indah Winarni; Annastasia Ediati; Agustini Utari
Belitung Nursing Journal Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): January - February
Publisher : Belitung Raya Foundation, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33546/bnj.2379

Abstract

Background: Illness uncertainty in parents of children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) refers to parents’ inability to create meaning in events related to their children having CAH. This may influence their role in caring for children with CAH. Objective: The study aimed to determine factors associated with illness uncertainty experienced by parents of children with CAH in a developing country. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 80 parents (43 mothers and 37 fathers) of children with CAH, selected using consecutive sampling methods. The Parent’s Perception of Uncertainty Scale (PPUS) was used to measure the illness uncertainty levels. Data were collected from March 2020 to October 2020. Independent t-test and chi-square test were used to determine factors (parent’s gender, age, educational level, monthly household income, number of children with CAH, history of child death due to CAH, child’s age when first diagnosed with CAH, duration of therapy, gender change, type of CAH (salt wasting/SW or simple virilizing/SV), current gender, and genitoplasty) influencing illness uncertainty in parents. Results: The mean scores of PPUS were 42.3 ± 12.91, and the majority of parents had a low PPUS score (49; 61%). Parents of children with SW-CAH showed higher uncertainty (44.2 ± 12.77) than those with SV-CAH (32.6 ± 8.86; p = 0.003). Parents who lost their children due to CAH were more likely to report a moderate illness uncertainty than parents who never experienced child mortality due to CAH (χ2(1, 80) = 4.893; p = 0.027). Conclusion: The factors significantly affecting uncertainty in parents of children with CAH determined in this study might help healthcare professionals, including nurses, to play a pivotal role in giving pertinent information regarding their children’s health, disease, and therapy to help manage parental uncertainty.
Genetic counselling problems with parents of child with ROB der(21;21)(q10:q10) Down syndrome: a case report Nisa. A.T. Hadi; Agustini Utari; Tri Indah Winarni
Universa Medicina Vol. 45 No. 2 (2026): Ahead Of Print
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18051/UnivMed.2026.v45.%p

Abstract

BackgroundDown syndrome (DS) is a genetic disorder caused by addition of a full or partial chromosome 21. The most common type of DS (90–95%) is pure trisomy 21; mosaicism occurs in 6–7%, and about 3–5% comprises translocation DS including Robertsonian translocation, which could be inherited from parents. This case shows a Robertsonian translocation der(21;21)(q10:q10) DS and the common financial problem among Indonesian parents being their inability to pay for examinations to determine the origin of the abnormality (inherited or de novo), which is a big challenge for genetic counselors. Case DescriptionA 2-month-old baby boy was admitted to the hospital with suspect Down syndrome referred by a pediatrician. The patient was the only child of 25-year-old parents. Physical examination showed several characteristics of DS, including upslanting palpebral fissure, a flat nasal bridge, horizontal palmar creases, sandal gap, and continuous murmur in upper left sternal border due to patent ductus arteriosus. Cytogenetic testing revealed the karyotype of derivative chromosome 21, namely Robertsonian translocation 46,XY,+21,der(21;21)(q10:q10). Parents declined to order cytogenetic testing due to financial concerns. ConclusionParents’ karyotype is critical to confirm the origin of the translocation. It is important to calculate the recurrence risk correctly especially when parents still want another child and to do non-directive counseling in terms of reproductive options. However, it cannot be done in this case because of the lack of parent’s karyotypes. Genetic counseling plays an essential role in providing an accurate recurrence risk based on the type of trisomy for future offspring and reproductive planning.