Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal jurnal syntax admiration Rechtenstudent Journal
Martoyo
Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember
Aerospace Engineering Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Computer Science & IT Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Rechtenstudent Journal

 1 
Analisis Hukum Islam Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Agama Jember tentang Penetapan Status Ahli Waris Non Muslim (No.1050/Pdt.G/2016/Pa.Jr) Saddam Husein; Martoyo Martoyo
Rechtenstudent Journal UIN KHAS Jember Vol. 1 No. 3 (2020): Rechtenstudent December 2020
Publisher : Sharia Faculty, KH. Achmad Siddiq State Islamic University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/rch.v1i3.35

Abstract

The Religious Court is a court that has the authority to adjudicate cases for Muslims. In the Jember Religious Court's decision No.1050 / Pdt.G / 2016 / PA.Jr explained that the Plaintiff, who is one of the children of the heir and the other five plaintiffs, filed a lawsuit against four defendants and seven co-defendants regarding inheritance cases; in this case, the inheritance is still not distributed by the heir to the heirs entirely. And the property is still controlled by one defendant. Also, the decision of the panel of judges is interesting. From the inheritance distributed in Islam, there are descendants of heirs who are non-Muslim who also receive a share of the estate. The research method used in this study is a normative research method with two approaches. Those are the case and the statute approach. This study found that: First, the construction of the case on the Jember Religious Court No. 1050 / Pdt.G / 2016 / PA.Jr is the five Plaintiffs against the eleven defendants. The plaintiffs filed the lawsuit because they stated that their parents were Muslims. With this, the plaintiffs want their inheritance to be distributed under Islamic law. Second, the Decidendi Ratio of the Panel of Judges in deciding cases is the provision of Article 49 paragraph (1) letter (b) of Law no. 7 of 1989 the Religious Court's authority to handle Inheritance cases for people who are Muslim.  
Analisis Kekuatan Hukum Pada Perjanjian Tidak Tertulis Arisan Online Emas di Kabupaten Jember Helina Hoirunnisa; Martoyo Martoyo
Rechtenstudent Journal UIN KHAS Jember Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022): Rechtenstudent August 2022
Publisher : Sharia Faculty, KH. Achmad Siddiq State Islamic University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/rch.v3i2.126

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas tentang arisan emas online di Desa Bangsalsari Kecamatan Bangsalsari Kabupaten Jember dimana praktik akad tersebut dilakukan secara tidak tertulis. Namun, hal itu hanya dilakukan atas kesepakatan beberapa pihak yang mengikuti arisan. Jika di kemudian hari ada masalah seperti wanprestasi, sangat sulit dibuktikan karena bentuk perjanjian tidak tertulis sehingga untuk menyelesaikan masalah tersebut diperlukan pengakuan dari pihak-pihak yang ikut arisan. Kajian dalam artikel ini adalah: 1) Bagaimana kedudukan perjanjian tidak tertulis online di Desa Bangsalsari Kecamatan Bangsalsari Kabupaten Jember menurut hukum perjanjian di Indonesia? 2) Bagaimana kekuatan hukum perjanjian tidak tertulis pengumpulan emas online di Desa Bangsalsari Kecamatan Bangsalsari Kabupaten Jember menurut hukum kontrak di Indonesia? 3) Bagaimana penyelesaian jika terjadi wanprestasi dalam arisan emas online berdasarkan kesepakatan tidak tertulis di Desa Bangsalsari Kecamatan Bangsalsari Kabupaten Jember? Metode yang digunakan dalam artikel ini adalah hukum normatif empiris. Hasil pasal ini menjelaskan bahwa: 1) Perjanjian tidak tertulis ini disebut juga dengan perjanjian innominate atau perjanjian tanpa nama yang pengaturannya tidak diatur dalam KUHPerdata atau KUHD. Perjanjian tidak tertulis dalam arisan online adalah sah dan mengikat bagi pembuatnya berdasarkan asas kebebasan berkontrak. 2) Perjanjian tidak tertulis dalam arisan online ini tetap mempunyai kekuatan hukum dengan melampirkan alat bukti yang sah sesuai dengan UU ITE. 3) Upaya hukum yang ditempuh apabila salah satu pihak wanprestasi adalah dengan melakukan perundingan yang telah disepakati di awal perjanjian.
Sanksi Tindak Pidana Pelaku Deelneming Pembunuhan Berencana Terhadap Anak di Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar Azalia Elian Faustina; Martoyo Martoyo
Rechtenstudent Journal UIN KHAS Jember Vol. 3 No. 3 (2022): Rechtenstudent December 2022
Publisher : Sharia Faculty, KH. Achmad Siddiq State Islamic University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/rch.v3i3.187

Abstract

Participation Murder (Delneeming) is a murder that contains various forms of physical or non-physical involvement of a person or group in carrying out a behavior or activity that creates a criminal act. However, in this case, problems often arise regarding accompaniment homicide, especially in court when judges consider the issue of accompaniment homicide from the point of view of the Criminal Law Act. The focus of the problems studied in this study are: 1.) How is the case for the perpetrators of deelneming/involvement of premeditated murder against children in the decision Number 864/PID.B-2015.PN.DPS at the Denpasar Bali District Court? 2.) Ratio Decidendi in the case of the crime of premeditated murder against children in decision number 864/PID.B-2015.PN DPS at the Denpasar Bali District Court 3.) Legal consequences for the establishment of sanctions for perpetrators of premeditated murder against children in decision number 864/ PID.B-2015.PN DPS at the Denpasar Bali District Court. The results of this study include: 1.) The chronology of the motive for assisting the murder carried out by Agustay as the defendant to the victim Angeline with the excuse of helping the main perpetrator Margarieth in exchange for a gift and hiding the problem from anyone. 2.) There is a judge's legal consideration which states that the defendant's brother was sentenced to 10 years in prison for the consideration of helping premeditated murder and burying the body with the intention of concealing the death 3.) In the legal consequences there is the formation of sanctions by the judge which contains irrelevant between the Indonesian judicial system and regulations the applicable legislation, among others, the decisions by the panel of judges and the regulations contained in article 57 of the Criminal Code and the absence of legal certainty because from a logical point of view there is a conflict with legal norms that can cause problems.
Co-Authors Azalia Elian Faustina Helina Hoirunnisa Kun Wazis Roihan Firdaus Nuris Saddam Husein