Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Edunomika (JIE) As-Syar'i : Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Kalijunjung Hasibuan
STAI-Barumun Raya Sibuhuan, Indonesia
Religion Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
The Position of Online Petitions in The Indonesian Legal Order Shohib Muslim; Kalijunjung Hasibuan; Didik Suhariyanto; Nugrah Gables Manery; Lisbet Situmorang
As-Syar'i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Vol 6 No 2 (2024): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah IAIN Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v6i2.6559

Abstract

This research is a qualitative research with a descriptive approach, namely describing the position of Online Petitions in the legal order in Indonesia and also describing its position in the legal order in European countries. The data used in this research is secondary data that researchers obtained from scientific articles, books, statutory regulations, magazines and credible websites that are commonly used and become references in each research. The data used was analyzed using descriptive and comparative legal analysis techniques, namely first describing the position of online petitions in Indonesian legal matters and then comparing them with various European countries. The result in this research show that that the regulation of online petitions in Indonesia is not very detailed and roams freely. This means that online petitions that have been filled in in large numbers exceeding the threshold in countries such as the UK and the United States which must be answered by the government, do not have to be answered in Indonesia. Online petitions are a form of product of freedom of expression from democracy. On the one hand, researchers believe that more specific arrangements for handling online petitions such as the United States and England also need to be implemented in Indonesia. However, on the other hand, this is not really necessary due to the responsive nature of the Indonesian government in answering the big questions on the minds of the public. Apart from that, these big questions are more often discussed through various talk shows, whether via digital television, print media, Instagram, YouTube and other platforms. For these various reasons, researchers believe that further regulation regarding online petitions is not really necessary in Indonesia. In fact, researchers are of the opinion that making a case go viral on social media without packaging it in the form of a petition is more effective than organizing the online petition itself.
Establishment Of The Asset Confiscation Law To Minimize Corruption In Indonesia Hudjolly Hudjolly; Rabith Madah Khulaili Harsya; Fatima Suatrat; Kalijunjung Hasibuan; Deny Susanto
As-Syar'i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Vol 6 No 2 (2024): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah IAIN Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v6i2.6569

Abstract

This research is qualitative research with a descriptive approach, namely describing a number of things that are closely related to confiscation of assets in criminal law, criminal acts of corruption, and other things. The data used in this research is secondary data in the form of the Criminal Code, Civil Code, statutory regulations, the official website of the House of Representatives, other credible websites, and so on. The researchers analyzed the data using grammatical and systematic legal analysis techniques, namely interpreting every word in the legislation and connecting it with other secondary data or other related legislation. The result in this article show there are three major urgencies for the presence of the Law on Asset Confiscation in Indonesia, namely to provide instruments that are stricter than the current regulations because in the Criminal Code, asset confiscation is only an additional crime and not the main crime, providing a deterrent effect for corruptors and potential corruptors, and of course minimizing corruption cases in Indonesia. Under existing legal structures, state losses resulting from criminal acts of corruption cannot be recovered. Recovering state losses takes years and may not even be returned at all. What is meant to provide a deterrent effect in this research is to impoverish corruptors, change the nomenclature of words whose nature is emphasized from facultative to imperative, and change its status not only to become an additional crime, but also to become a principal crime. On this basis, researchers are of the opinion that the presence of asset confiscation laws in Indonesia can be effective in minimizing the occurrence of corruption in Indonesia.
PROFIT AND LOSSES OF BOYCOTTING UNILEVER PRODUCTS (PANCASILA ECONOMIC AND MASLAHAH PERSPECTIVE) Lestari Wuryanti; Euis Mufahamah; Wuri Astamala Dewi; Arie Fitria; Kalijunjung Hasibuan
JURNAL ILMIAH EDUNOMIKA Vol 8, No 1 (2024): EDUNOMIKA
Publisher : ITB AAS Indonesia Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29040/jie.v8i1.11677

Abstract

Abstract The boycott policy against Unilever products is seen as a form of firm legal standing on which the Indonesian people stand and aims to provide a deterrent effect against any party that supports Israel's attack on Pakistan. Therefore, this research aims to analyze these policies from the perspective of Pancasila Economics and Maslahah Al-'Ammah. This research is qualitative research with an explanatory approach. The data used in this research is secondary data that researchers obtained from scientific articles, books, magazines, credible websites, and a number of other sources that are usually used in every research. The research results show that first, The boycott policy against Unilever products has a number of strengths and opportunities as indicators of profits and a number of weaknesses and threats as indicators of equal losses. However, a number of weaknesses and threats lie in materialistic matters such as loss of salaries for employees, loss of jobs, increased unemployment, and so on. A number of strengths and opportunities as indicators of profit lie in principal matters that are in line with the philosophy of Panacasila and Maslahah Al-A'mmah including humanity, justice, welfare and equality. Second, The policy of boycotting Unilever products is in line with the principles of Pancasila economics which do not only view profits as materialistic in nature, but profits must also uphold human, divine, justice and welfare values. Last, The boycott policy of Unilever products is in line with the concept of Maslahah Al-'Ammah which upholds human values, namely that dharuriyyah needs must be fulfilled in every human being in general and the Palestinian community in particular. Thus, anything that prevents the fulfillment of these needs must be opposed at all costs. One way is to boycott Unilever products. Keywords: Boycotting, Unilever, Pancasila Economic, Maslahah Perspective
Co-Authors Arie Fitria Deny Susanto Didik Suhariyanto Euis Mufahamah Fatima Suatrat Harsya, Rabith Madah Khulaili Hudjolly hudjolly Lestari Wuryanti Lisbet Situmorang Nugrah Gables Manery Shohib MUSLIM Wuri Astamala Dewi