Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science Jurnal Litigasi Amsir
Apriyanto Nusa
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Ichsan Gorontalo
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Urgence Of The Control Mechanism Of Authority The Prosecutor General In Waiting The Case For Public Interest (Seponeering) Apriyanto NUSA; I Nyoman NURJAYA; Abdul MADJID; Bambang SUGIRI
International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022): International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science (Jul
Publisher : Indonesia Strategic Sustainability

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38142/ijesss.v3i2.294

Abstract

The urgency of the control mechanism over the Attorney General's authority in overriding cases in the public interest (seponeering) is a manifestation of obtaining protection of human rights for every citizen who is harmed by the issuance of seponeering by the Attorney General. Apart from these reasons, the importance of controlling the authority of the Attorney General is also to create the principles of justice and legal certainty. Legal practices that often occur in the judicial process show stagnation in realizing these three things, both the protection of human rights (HAM), justice and legal certainty. Whereas the spirit of forming the Criminal Procedure Code which was promulgated based on Law Number 8 of 1981 laid the basic foundation for the protection of human rights (HAM) as the main goal, which includes upholding justice and legal certainty. There is stagnation in the effort to control the seponeering issued by the Attorney General, because there are juridical limitations in the pretrial object institution as stated in the Elucidation of Article 77 of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code which states that: with "discontinuation of prosecution" does not include setting aside cases for the public interest which are the authority of the Attorney General.
Analisis Yuridis Putusan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Tindak Pidana Asusila Terhadap Anak Anderwati Maku; Darmawati Darmawati; Apriyanto Nusa
Jurnal Litigasi Amsir Vol 11 No 2 (2024): Februari
Publisher : Faculty of Law Andi Sapada Institute of Social Sciences and Business

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research focuses on the application of criminal law and judicial considerations in cases of immoral acts against children, as exemplified in Decision Number 53/Pid.sus/2019/PN.Tmt. The study employs normative legal research methods, utilizing library research and analyzing secondary and primary legal materials. The analysis is prescriptive, aiming to assess the correctness or appropriateness of the subject under study according to the law. The Child Protection Law outlines various sanctions for perpetrators of immoral acts against children, often stemming from promiscuity and dating relationships between perpetrators and victims. The study underscores the need for both internal and external monitoring to address morality crimes against children effectively.
Co-Authors Abdul MADJID Anderwati Maku Bambang SUGIRI Darmawati Darmawati I Nyoman NURJAYA