Nirawati, Lia Septy
Prodi Magister Pendidikan Matematika, Pascasarjana, FKIP – UNS

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DAN TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN DAN PERTIDAKSAMAAN DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS X SMK SE-KABUPATEN NGAWI TAHUN PELAJARAN 2015/2016 Nirawati, Lia Septy; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Sujadi, Imam
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (345.054 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to know the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in mathematics viewed from the students adversity quotient. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning of TAI, TGT, and direct learning model. The type of research was a  quasi-experimental research with a  3x3 factorial design. The study population was all grade 10 students of Secondary Schools in Ngawi Regency in the academic year of 2015/2016. Instruments used for data collection were mathematics achievement test and learning style questionnaire. The data analysis technique used was the two-way ANOVA with unequal cell. Based on the hypothesis test, it was concluded that: 1) The mathematics learning achievement of the students who were treated by TAI learning model was better than the mathematics learning achievement of the students who were treated by TGT and direct learning model on equality and inequality, the mathematics learning achievement of the students who were treated by TGT learning model was better than the mathematics learning achievement of the students who were treated by direct learning model on equality an inequality; 2) The mathematics learning achievement of the students with visual type was better than the mathematics learning achievement of the students with auditory or kinesthetic type and the learning achievement of auditory type students was better than  the  learning  achievement of kinesthetic type students on equality and inequality; 3) The visual type students who were treated by TAI learning model had better mathematics learning achievement than the students with TGT or direct learning model and the students mathematics learning learning  achievement with TGT learning model was same the students with direct learning model; the mathematics achievement of auditory type students who were treated by TAI learning model had better mathematics learning achievement than the students with TGT or direct learning model and students who were treated by TGT learning model had better mathematics learning achievement than the students with direct learning model; the mathematics achievement of kinesthetic type students who were treated by TAI, TGT, and direct learning models had the same mathematics learning achievement; 4) In TAI, TGT and direct learning model, the mathematics learning achievement of visual type, auditory, and kinesthetic had the same mathematics learning achievement.Keywords: TAI, TGT, Direct Learning Model, Learning Style, Mathematics Learning Achievement
PROFIL BERPIKIR SISWA SMP DALAM MEMECAHKAN BANGUN RUANG LIMAS BERDASARKAN TEORI BRUNER Nirawati, Lia Septy; Cahyono, Heri
Jurnal Karya Pendidikan Matematika Vol 6, No 1 (2019): Jurnal Karya Pendidikan Matematika Volume 6 Nomor 1 Tahun 2019
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (99.615 KB) | DOI: 10.26714/jkpm.6.1.2019.64-70

Abstract

This study aims to determine the profile of students' thinking in solving mathematical problems and to find out the results of the application of Brunerd's theory in solving the problem of building a Limas room in junior high school students.Retrieval Techniques The subjects in this study were seen from the results of tests with high, medium, low categories. High categories were seen from the test results if the answers to the tests were all correct, the categories were seen from the test results if the answers to the tests still had errors, while the categories were low seen from the test results if the answer to the test is still wrong. This technique is used because researchers have a specific purpose for several considerations, namely to find out whether the application of bruner theory can be applied in mathematics subjects, considering that mathematics is considered a difficult subject for students. The subjects of this study were 6 students. Data collection techniques in this study used test, interview and documentation methods while the data validity techniques in this study used triangulation techniques which included 3 elements, namely sources, methods, theories. In this study researchers used data analysis techniques with 3 components, namely: data reduction, data presentation, conclusion drawing.The results showed that subjects with a high category tended to have high-thinking profiles, they had no difficulty in doing tests and interviews. The subjects with the medium category were more likely to have thinking profiles, while they had a little difficulty in doing tests and interviews, while the subjects with the lower category were more likely to have low-thinking profiles, they had difficulty doing tests and interviews. This is what causes a difference between them. Based on the discussion, it can be concluded that junior high school students in their profile think in solving problems in the building of a limiter junior high school students are able to describe the building of Limas space means that SMP students are able to understand pyramid material shown to the sensitivity of students in learning to build Limas space so that junior high school students in their imagination are able to mention 1 example of a pyramid building and all junior high school students are able to mention the types of Limas indicated by the independence of junior high school students who are able to mention various types of building> 1 in terms of bases, and junior high students are able to say> 1 element the building elements of the Limas space means that junior high school students are able to understand the pyramid material shown to the sensitivity of junior high school students to be able to mention the Limas parts properly and correctly.