Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lingua Cultura Jurnal Arbitrer Sirok Bastra DIALEKTIKA: JURNAL BAHASA, SASTRA DAN BUDAYA Southeast Asian Language and Literature Studies
Selly Rizki Yanita
National Research And Innovation Agency
Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
KONTRAS INTONASI KALIMAT DEKLARATIF DAN INTEROGATIF DALAM BAHASA BIMA Selly Rizki Yanita; Siti Hannah Sekarwati
Sirok Bastra Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Sirok Bastra
Publisher : Kantor Bahasa Provinsi Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (229.865 KB) | DOI: 10.37671/sb.v3i2.63

Abstract

Makalah ini membahas kontras intonasi kalimat deklaratif dan interogatif dalam bahasa Bima. Tujuan penulisan makalah ini untuk mengetahui kontras intonasi dari kedua modus pada tataran kalimat yang sama. Makalah ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan fonetik eksperimental melalui Program Praat. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan adanya perbedaan intonasi pada modus deklaratif dan interogatif dalam bahasa Bima. Kontur intonasi pada kalimat deklaratif menunjukkan alir nada datar-naik pada subjek, alir nada datar-turun pada predikat, dan alir nada turun pada keterangan. Adapun kontur intonasi pada kalimat interogatif menunjukkan alir nada datar-naik pada subjek dan alir nada naik-turun pada predikat. Puncak nada pada modus deklaratif berada di subjek, sedangkan puncak nada pada modus interogatif berada di predikat atau keterangan. Selain itu, ditemukan bahwa nada final modus interogatif lebih rendah 0,91 st daripada nada final modus deklaratif.
Language Documentation Practices in Indonesia: A Critical Theory Perspective Budiono, Satwiko; Yanita, Selly Rizki
Lingua Cultura Vol. 18 No. 1 (2024): Lingua Cultura
Publisher : Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/lc.v18i1.11878

Abstract

The research examined the potential of language documentation practices in Indonesia. Using principles from critical theory, it argued that language documentation was different from language description, which was classified as monodisciplinary linguistics. Rather, language documentation had a broad scope of potential uses beyond descriptive linguistics. This was because language documentation could be linked to other linguistics fields such as sociolinguistics, oral tradition, oral history, and others. The core of language documentation was the natural language recordings that can be used in various fields, making language documentation part of interdisciplinary linguistics. Besides, multiple national and international institutions recognized its value. Meanwhile, language documentation in Indonesia was still closely linked to traditional descriptive or theoretical linguistics and was considered a data collection process rather than an independent field in linguistics. Furthermore, natural language recordings were still considered unscientific by the Indonesian academic community, especially in linguistics fields. This was because natural language recording could not be a final project for linguistics students or an output of linguistics research in Indonesia. Research output was still limited to products such as dictionaries, teaching materials, grammar, language maps, and so on. The research applied a descriptive qualitative approach. Data collection included close reading books, journals, and other relevant academic materials. Therefore, the research argues that natural language recordings should be considered a valid scientific activity as a final project for linguistics students or the output of linguistic research in Indonesia. Thus, the number of natural language recordings in Indonesia will increase in national and international repositories. In fact, this can contribute tolinguistic research because many linguistics scholars can utilize these language documentation results.
Representation of Nationalism in The Kubro Art Performed by The Seven Angel Kubro Art Group Wahyuni, Dwi; Harini; Selly Rizki Yanita
 Southeast Asian Language and Literature Studies Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Southeast Asian Languages and Literature Studies
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55981/salls.2025.13513

Abstract

The development of popular culture lately has an impact on local culture which is starting to be  abandoned, especially by the younger generation. Like kesenian Kubro in Ngasinan Village,  Purworejo, which was abandoned because there was no longer public enthusiasm for that art.  Kubro in Ngasinan Village has been preserved again by Grup Kesenian Kubro Tujuh Bidadari by  combining Kubro with dangdut rhythms to suit the tastes of the community. This effort is a big  thing in preserving local culture. Especially with the involvement of children who are the nation's  next generation in this effort. Thus, Kubro can be a representation of nationalism through regional  arts that are adapted to the times without losing the identity of the art. In this study, visual and  non-visual signs that represent nationalism will be analyzed. The method used in this study is a  qualitative descriptive method with a semiological approach. Based on the results of the analysis,  there are representations of nationalism found in dance moves, the costumes of dancers, and  Kubro’s song lyrics in Purworejo Regency. Based on the results of the analysis, it is hoped that the  main purpose of this art as an effort to preserve a local culture that represents nationalism as well  as entertainment for the community can be fulfilled.
Paradigm Shift of Language Revitalization in Indonesia Budiono, Satwiko; Yanita, Selly Rizki; Syarfina, Tengku
Jurnal Arbitrer Vol. 10 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/ar.10.4.338-347.2023

Abstract

Language revitalization as a linguistic social movement that aims to preserve and promote local languages, is experiencing a paradigm shift in Indonesia. These shifts can be seen from the aspect of language status objects. That is meant here is that the object of language status in language revitalization is not only languages with minority and endangered status. All local languages in Indonesia can be revitalized. Based on these conditions, this study explores the shift in the language revitalization paradigm in Indonesia. This aims to explain the structure of paradigm shift and provide an explanation for understanding language revitalization in its historical development in Indonesia. The study method uses qualitative methods with data collection techniques from the results of literature studies. Data analysis refers to Thomas Samuel Kuhn’s structure of the scientific revolution in terms of paradigm shift. As a result, the shift in the language revitalization paradigm in terms of the language status object is based on the heterogeneity of languages in Indonesia. Meanwhile, all languages in Indonesia must and have the right to be preserved in accordance with statutory regulations. This condition makes the government regulate language revitalization regulations that apply to all languages so that all languages in Indonesia receive the same treatment in the context of language preservation efforts.
PEMAHAMAN MASYARAKAT TERHADAP PENGGUNAAN PREPOSISI DI Selly Rizki Yanita
DIALEKTIKA: JURNAL BAHASA, SASTRA DAN BUDAYA Vol. 6 No. 2 (2019): DESEMBER
Publisher : Prodi Sastra Inggris UKI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33541/dia.v6i2.4763

Abstract

Pedoman Umum Ejaan Bahasa Indonesia (PUEBI) dibuat untuk dijadikan sebagai pedoman yang mengatur kaidah berbahasa Indonesia dengan baik, mulai dari tataran huruf hingga kalimat. Sayangnya, masih banyak masyarakat yang belum sesuai dengan kaidah bahasa Indonesia saat mereka berbahasa. Salah satu kaidah yang banyak mengalami kesalahan adalah perbedaan penulisan di sebagai preposisi dan di- sebagai prefiks, serta perbedaan antara di dan pada dalam penggunaannya di dalam kalimat. Kedua permasalahan tersebut dikaji dalam tulisan ini dengan menggunakan uji korelasi data menggunakan SPSS yang diambil dari 40 responden secara acak melalui media sosial. Hasil uji menunjukkan, masih ada responden yang salah dalam membedakan preposisi di dan di- sebagai penanda verba pasif, serta perbedaan penggunaan di dan pada. Tidak hanya itu, jurusan pendidikan serta pekerjaan juga mempengaruhi pemahaman dalam menggunakan preposisi di yang sesuai dengan kaidah bahasa Indonesia.
Co-Authors Budiono, Satwiko Dwi Wahyuni Harini Siti Hannah Sekarwati Tengku Syarfina