Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP)
Muhamad Abas
Faculty of Law, Buana Perjuangan University, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Zonasi Jarak Pasar Modern dan Pasar Rakyat berdasarkan Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Karawang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 (Studi Kasus Pasar di Kabupaten Karawang) Muhamad Abas; Ade Yunas Setiawan; Farhan Asyhadi
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 4 (2024): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (Mei - Juni 2024)
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Di daerah pemukiman di Indonesia, pada dasarnya daerah tersebut telah memiliki pasar rakyat yang telah menyediakan bahan-bahan atau kebutuhan masyarakat setempat. Dengan masuknya pasar modern ke dalam kawasan pasar rakyat, hal ini menimbulkan konflik antara penjual di pasar rakyat dengan pengelola pasar modern. Saat ini hampir di setiap kecamatan di Kabupaten Karawang terdapat ritel yang berformat pasar modern, bahkan terkadang terdapat lebih dari satu ritel yang berformat pasar modern. Metode Yuridis sosiologis yang sesuai dengan desain penelitian survei lapangan, studi kepustakaan dan studi hukum. Jumlah minimarket di Kabupaten Karawang menurut Dinas Perindustrian dan Perdagangan sebanyak 525 buah, sedangkan jumlah pasar rakyat di Kabupaten Karawang dari 30 kecamatan terdiri dari 31 pasar. Faktor-faktor yang dapat mempengaruhi berfungsinya hukum dalam masyarakat atau efektifitas hukum dipengaruhi oleh beberapa faktor, antara lain: faktor hukumnya; faktor penegak hukum; faktor masyarakat dan kebudayaan. Dari 31 pasar rakyat yang tersebar di setiap kecamatan, terdapat 20 pasar rakyat yang lokasinya berdekatan dengan minimarket di daerah tersebut, lebih dari 50% pasar rakyat di Kabupaten Karawang tidak terlindungi oleh penegak hukum. Menurut analisis penulis ada 3, diantaranya faktor hukum yang saling bertentangan, dengan kata lain pembuatan peraturan presiden dan peraturan daerah sinkronisasi antara keduanya.
REKONSTRUKSI PENAFSIRAN WANPRESTASI DALAM PERJANJIAN FIDUSIA TERHADAP EKSEKUSI PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Piki Hendiko Siregar; Muhamad Abas; Yuniar Rahmatiar; Ana Ximenes Sousa
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 2 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6895

Abstract

In financing practices in Indonesia, fiduciary guarantees play a crucial role for both creditors and debtors. However, their implementation often creates inequality because the determination of default is made unilaterally by the creditor. Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 presents a new interpretation that emphasizes justice, legal protection for debtors, and the importance of the judicial process. The purpose of this study is to understand the impact of this shift in the interpretation of default on the validity and implementation of fiduciary guarantees in financing practices in Indonesia, as well as to analyze the legal considerations of Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 regarding the validity of execution and legal protection for creditors and debtors. This study uses a normative juridical methodology with a statutory and conceptual approach. Data were collected through a literature review of legal norms, Constitutional Court decisions, scientific doctrines, legal writings, and supplemented with secondary data from the Financial Services Authority (OJK) and the Indonesian Financing Companies Association (APPI). The results of the study indicate more specifically that after the issuance of Constitutional Court Decision No. Based on Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019, there was a 35% decrease in reports of disputes over the execution of fiduciary guarantees in district courts during the 2020–2023 period, reflecting increased compliance by financing institutions with the principle of due process of law. Determination of default can no longer be made unilaterally by creditors, but must be done through a fair and proportional legal mechanism. This decision strengthens legal protection for debtors, affirms the principle of due process of law, and requires system adjustments by financing institutions, thus making an important contribution to civil law reform, particularly in the implementation of fairer, more equal, and constitutional fiduciary guarantees in Indonesia.
Legal Analysis Related To The Implementation Of Government Regulation Number 22 Of 2021 Concerning The Implementation Of Environmental Protection And Management For The B3 Waste Management Company Pt Dame Alam Sejahtera Holmen Siahaan; Yuniar Rahmatiar; Muhamad Abas; Ethan Lim kong
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 2 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.7051

Abstract

Article 28H paragraph 1 of the Constitution contains the right of everyone to live with happiness in birth and mind and to get a good and healthy environment which means free from pollution, safe from the dangers of hazardous waste. The presence of derivative regulations of Government Regulation No. 22 of 2021, which regulates the Implementation of Environmental Protection and Management (P3LH) creates even clearer rules, especially related to B3 Waste management The presence of the B3 Waste management industry is needed as a party that manages B3 Waste from waste producers, especially when these producers do not have the ability or facilities to manage it themselves. One of the industries managing B3 Waste, PT Dame Alam Sejahtera, has implemented Government Regulation No. 22 of 2021 concerning P3LH that has environmental approval that has been determined by the Central Government, in this writing using an empirical legal research method. The conclusion in this study is that the implementation of Government Regulation No. 22 of 2021 concerning P3LH is considered more complex than previous regulations, especially related to the change of management permits to technical approvals according to B3 Waste management activities, and administrative sanctions as per article 508 paragraph 1.Government Regulation No. 22 of 2021 concerning PP3LH, such as written reprimands to revocation of permits, is a strategic step to uphold environmental justice and responsibility in a preventive and persuasive manner, without directly applying criminal sanctions.
Co-Authors Ade Yunas Setiawan Ana Ximenes Sousa Ethan Lim kong Farhan Asyhadi Holmen Siahaan Piki Hendiko Siregar Yuniar Rahmatiar Yuniar Rahmatiar