Faraby Martha
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Comparison of Visual Acuity and Defocus Curve after Cataract Surgery with Pure Extended Depth Focus Lens and Mini-Monovision - Interim Analysis -: Oral Presentation - Experimental Study - Resident M. Dio Syaputra; Syska Widyawati; Faraby Martha; Tri Rahayu; Aria Kekalih
Majalah Oftalmologi Indonesia Vol 49 No S2 (2023): Supplement Edition
Publisher : The Indonesian Ophthalmologists Association (IOA, Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Mata Indonesia (Perdami))

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35749/4qer8x86

Abstract

Abstract Introduction & Objectives : Presbyopia after cataract surgery is still a problem despite recent surgical techniques and intraocular lens technology development. Mini-monovision techniques and pure extended depth of focus (EDoF) lenses are alternatives to achieve good distance and intermediate visual acuity at relatively inexpensive.This study aims to compare the clinical outcome after cataract surgery with binocular mini-monovision and cataract surgery using a pure monocular EDoF lens. Methods : Subjects were randomized into the mini-monovision group (standard monofocal lenses with -1.25 D of anisometropia) and the pure EDoF group. The blinding was achieved by masking the clinical outcome examiners. Results : Interim analysis of 16 patients revealed the outcome of uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA and BCDVA) were not significantly different between groups. Median of uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) and mean of uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) of binocular mini-monovision were 0.10 (0-0.10) LogMar and 0.26 + 0.12 LogMar. Median UIVA & mean UNVA monocular EDoF were 0.19 (0.14-0.50) LogMar and 0.54 + 0.11 LogMar, respectively. The Mann- Whitney U test of UIVA between groups revealed p=0.001, and the unpaired T-test of UNVA revealed p=0.000. Mean defocus curve of -2.50 D lens were 0.31 LogMar in binocular mini- monovision group and 0.51 LogMar monocular in EDoF group (p=0.019). Conclusion : UIVA, UNVA and defocus curve of -2.50 D lens in the mini-monovision group were better than the EDoF group.
Validity and Reliability of Farra Eye Model as a Surgical Simulator for Capsulorhexis Training: Oral Presentation - Observational Study - Resident HANIFAH RAHMANI NURSANTI; Julie Dewi Barliana; Syska Widyawati; Faraby Martha; Levina Chandra Khoe
Majalah Oftalmologi Indonesia Vol 49 No S2 (2023): Supplement Edition
Publisher : The Indonesian Ophthalmologists Association (IOA, Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Mata Indonesia (Perdami))

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35749/w12r3545

Abstract

Abstract Introduction & Objectives : Various simulation models are available for cataract surgery training. Farra Eye Model, a new cataract surgery simulator, was developed to provide the resident with more affordable options. This study aims to determine the validity and reliability of the Farra Eye Model as a surgical simulator for capsulorhexis training. Methods : A cross-sectional pilot study was performed among ophthalmology residents and consultants to assess face, content, and construct validity of a new surgical simulator. Subjects were divided into novice, intermediate, and expert groups according to their level of expertise. Face and content validity was assessed using a validated questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale response. Construct validity was done by comparing capsulorhexis performance between the three groups. Two raters assessed performance using capsulorhexis indices in ICO-OSCAR: Phaco assessment tool, number of forceps grabs, and duration of capsulorhexis. Results : A total of 33 subjects were recruited and divided equally into three groups. The overall face validity score was favorable (3.67 ± 0.67). However, the capsule elasticity was rated poor (2.73 ± 1.1) among the intermediate group. The content validity was favorable regarding the overall score (4.15± 0.58) and each assessment component. In the construct validity test, intermediate and expert groups showed better capsulorhexis performance than the novice group on all parameters (p<0.001), with good inter-rater reliability (ICC>0.7). Conclusion : Farra Eye Model has a good face and content validity for capsulorhexis training and is able to differentiate the novice group from intermediate and expert groups. However, it remains a challenge to replicate human lens capsule elasticity.