Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Judicial Review Journal of Law and Legal Reform
Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Revitalizing Creative Industries: A Strategic Approach to Bolstering Buleleng Regency's Economy Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku; Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini; Ni Ketut Sari Adnyani
Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 25 No. 2 (2023): December 2023
Publisher : Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/jjr.v25i2.8145

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) in Buleleng Regency, particularly in the creative industry sector. It aims to (1) analyze the status of MSME-based creative industries during the pandemic, (2) identify the challenges faced by these enterprises, and (3) propose economic policy strategies to strengthen them. Findings reveal that (1) the number of MSME-based creative industries in Buleleng Regency increased between 2019 and 2022. However, they encountered issues such as limited access to capital, lack of business formalization, human resource constraints, technology underutilization, suboptimal marketing and promotional efforts, and production challenges. (2) During the pandemic, these businesses faced obstacles like limited capital for owners, scarcity of raw materials and production equipment, bookkeeping issues, marketing constraints, managerial deficiencies, limited human resource capabilities, and difficulties in product distribution. (3) To bolster MSME-based creative industries during the pandemic, a multi-pronged economic policy strategy is proposed. This includes instilling local pride in using MSME products, enhancing product packaging, and organizing MSME groups based on business scale with the involvement of a curation team to identify businesses suitable for broader exposure.
Law Enforcement Against Perpetrators of Violence Sexual Against Children in the Decision Number 100/Pid.Sus/2025/PN.Sgr Nabila Budiman; Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini; Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku
Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 28 No. 1 (2026): June 2026 (Articles in Press)
Publisher : Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/jjr.v28i1.11417

Abstract

Sexual violence against children constitutes a serious violation of human rights, with far-reaching consequences in physical, psychological, social, and moral dimensions. In cases involving sexual violence against children, law enforcement should ideally not only emphasize the punishment of perpetrators but also prioritize victim recovery and preventive measures to ensure that similar crimes do not recur.  The findings of this study indicate that, first, law enforcement in Decision Number 100/Pid.Sus/2025/PN.Sgr has not yet demonstrated concrete measures to ensure the psychological recovery of the victim. In essence, victim recovery is an inseparable element of substantive justice. From the perspective of progressive law, judges should not merely act as the “mouthpiece of the law,” but should also serve as active agents in realizing social justice within society. Although the decision reflects the principle of legal certainty, the dimensions of substantive justice and humanitarian values still need to be strengthened so that law enforcement against perpetrators of sexual violence against children can genuinely side with the victims. Second, Law Number 35 of 2014 explicitly mandates the state to protect children from all forms of violence, exploitation, and discrimination. Within this framework, the principle of the best interests of the child must serve as the primary consideration in every legal policy and court decision. However, in the Singaraja District Court Decision, this principle has not been fully implemented, as the judgment does not include an order for the victim’s psychological recovery. The absence of provisions concerning victim rehabilitation and the restoration of the victim’s rights indicates that the aspect of child protection has not been optimally accommodated. Therefore, strengthening the implementation of a restorative justice approach within the national legal system is necessary to ensure that substantive justice can be realized for child victims of sexual violence.
Land Border Dispute Resolution Model in the Involvement of Customary Leaders Between Indonesia and Timor Leste in the Oecussi Enclave Area Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku; Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini; Hartana; Lukas Norman Kbarek; Seguito Monteiro
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): January, 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v6i1.15606

Abstract

Indonesia and Timor Leste still have 4% of the land border that has not been agreed upon by the two countries, the fact is that the people who live on the border that is still being disputed have not accepted the implementation of international law which is the basis for resolving the border. However, this is precisely an obstacle when the state takes the main role, without considering the Traditional Leaders. This research will focus on efforts to reconstruct the role and existence of traditional leaders in the cultural dimension and the interconnectedness of local institutions, so that later a model for resolving state border disputes will be built with structured, legitimate cultural values that can be accepted by all components of society on the land border between the two countries, especially the Oecussi Enclave area. The outputs (products) of this research are the spectrum of the existence of traditional figures as local institutions based on religion in resolving disputes, a draft model for resolving land boundary disputes between Indonesia and Timor Leste in the Oecussi Enclave area, a draft mechanism for engineering public policies that are based on the cultural diversity of the Indonesian and Timor Leste communities, and scientific articles and intellectual property rights (IPR) on soft security based on culture in the role of traditional figures in resolving land boundary disputes between Indonesia and Timor Leste.
Co-Authors Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku Hartana Lukas Norman Kbarek Nabila Budiman Ni Ketut Sari Adnyani Seguito Monteiro