Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Bayan: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora
Mohamad Subli
Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Morowali
Religion Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
The Position of Testimony in the Court Evidentiary System: A Juridical-Normative Analysis of Indonesian Law and Islamic Courts Erniawati; Abdul Halim Talli; Zulhas’ari Mustafa; Mohamad Subli
BAYAN: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Januari 2026
Publisher : PT. Nawa Edukasi Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Testimony constitutes an essential evidentiary instrument within Indonesian and Islamic judicial systems, yet its application encounters practical complexities. This research aims to analyze the position of testimony in court evidentiary systems through a juridical-normative approach by comparing Indonesian positive law and Islamic law. The method employed is normative juridical with qualitative analysis of legal norms, testimony concepts, and case studies. Research findings indicate that: (1) Testimony regulation in KUHAP adheres to the negative legal system, while Islamic judiciary implements testimony hierarchy based on case types with more rigid standards; (2) Validity requirements for testimony in positive law emphasize procedural-formal aspects, whereas Islamic law applies the principles of 'adalah and dhabt with comprehensive tazkiyah al-syuhud mechanism; (3) The evidentiary position of testimony in Indonesian system is flexible with Constitutional Court Decision No. 65/PUU-VIII/2010 expanding acceptance of testimonium de auditu, while Islamic system applies the principle of "dar'u al-hudud bi al-syubuhat" for maximum prudence. This research concludes that despite different approaches, both systems converge toward justice objectives through mutually complementary mechanisms within Indonesia's legal plurality context.
Co-Authors Abdul Halim Talli Erniawati Zulhas’ari Mustafa