Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Daulat Hukum Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis
Ariawan Gunadi
Universitas Tarumanegara
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Dinamika Politik Hukum Keanggotaan Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat: Unikameralisme dalam Bayang-Bayang Sistem Bikameral Rupertus Arvinci Ngabut; Ariawan Gunadi
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 5 No 10 (2024): Tema Filsafat Hukum, Politik Hukum dan Etika Profesi Hukum
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v5i10.871

Abstract

The structural changes to the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) following the 1945 Constitution amendment have created ambiguity in Indonesia’s representative system. The MPR, consisting of the House of Representatives (DPR) and the Regional Representative Council (DPD), does not fully reflect true bicameralism due to the unequal authority between the two chambers. Using a legal-political approach, this study examines the implications of MPR membership for constitutional dynamics and power balance. Findings indicate that regulatory changes and constitutional practices influence MPR’s role and checks and balances in legislation and policymaking, highlighting the need for reforms to strengthen the representative system.
Legal Protection for Franchisors and Franchisees in Cases of Breach of Franchise Agreement Daniel Daniel; Ariawan Gunadi
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 8, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v8i4.48994

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of Indonesia’s positive law in providing legal certainty and justice for the parties in resolving franchise disputes arising from breach of contract. The research uses a normative juridical method with a statutory and conceptual approach. The findings indicate that Indonesia’s legal framework on franchising has been comprehensively regulated under Government Regulation No. 42 of 2007, Minister of Trade Regulation No. 71 of 2019, and the Civil Code provisions. Normatively, these regulations have provided a foundation of legal certainty and protection for both franchisors and franchisees. However, the effectiveness of implementation remains limited due to the lack of administrative compliance among business actors, weak government supervision, and the inequality of bargaining power in standard contracts. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen state supervision, enhance legal awareness among business actors, and enforce principles of justice and good faith in the execution of franchise agreements, so that the law not only ensures formal certainty but also achieves substantive justice for both parties.
Co-Authors Daniel Daniel Rupertus Arvinci Ngabut