Andy Visi Kartika
Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Bridging Clinical Competence and Spirituality through the Integration of an Islamic Curriculum in Medical Professional Education: Literature Review Ryzka Puput Yunisyar; Andy Visi Kartika; Zulfitriani Murfat
Journal La Medihealtico Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Journal La Medihealtico
Publisher : Newinera Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37899/journallamedihealtico.v7i1.3026

Abstract

The integration of Islamic values into medical professional education has emerged as a critical issue in response to the growing demand for physicians who are not only clinically competent but also possess strong moral and spiritual integrity in medical practice. This study aims to analyze and synthesize scholarly findings on the forms, models, and characteristics of Islamic curriculum integration and its contribution to the development of clinical and spiritual competencies among medical professional students. Employing a literature review method with a narrative integrative review design, this study examines national and international scientific publications published between 2020 and 2025. Data were collected through systematic searches of academic databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, DOAJ, and Garuda (Kemdikbud), and analyzed using narrative synthesis. The findings indicate that the integration of Islamic values within medical professional curricula is implemented through diverse models, ranging from the infusion of Islamic principles into courses and clinical learning, the development of integrated learning modules, to comprehensive institution-wide curricular approaches. Such integration is not reported to hinder the acquisition of clinical skills; rather, it strengthens medical professionalism by reinforcing clinical ethics, professional conduct (adab), empathetic communication, and spiritual awareness in doctor–patient interactions. The Clinical Skills Laboratory emerges as a particularly strategic learning environment for contextualizing and internalizing Islamic values through authentic clinical practice. Nevertheless, the literature also identifies challenges, including limitations in objective and standardized evaluation methods, as well as variability in faculty readiness and institutional capacity. Overall, the integration of an Islamic curriculum holds strong potential as a pedagogical framework for bridging clinical and spiritual competencies in medical professional education, provided it is designed systematically, contextually, and supported by appropriate instructional and assessment strategies.
Efektivitas Intervensi Gizi Tiga Bulan Terhadap Perbaikan Status Antropometri (HAZ, WAZ, WHZ) Pada Balita Stunting Sidrah Darma; Shofiyah Latief; Andy Visi Kartika
Jurnal Ventilator Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): September : Jurnal Ventilator
Publisher : Stikes Kesdam IV/Diponegoro Semarang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59680/ventilator.v4i3.2689

Abstract

Background: Stunting in under-five children is a chronic nutritional problem affecting linear growth, cognitive development, and long-term risk of non-communicable disease. Structured nutrition interventions with regular anthropometric monitoring are expected to improve nutritional status, although evidence on the magnitude of short-term (3-month) improvement at the primary care level remains limited.Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a 3-month nutrition intervention on changes in anthropometric status (Height-for-Age Z-score/HAZ, Weight-for-Age Z-score/WAZ, and Weight-for-Height Z-score/WHZ) among stunted under-five children.Methods: This prospective cohort study used a pre-post design without a control group involving 32 stunted children in Mamajang Subdistrict, Makassar City. Weight and height were measured at baseline, Month-1, Month-2, and Month-3, then converted into Z-scores based on the WHO Child Growth Standards (2006). The Friedman test was used to compare the four time points, followed by pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Bonferroni correction.