p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Respirasi (JR)
Darren Wan-Teck Lim
Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore/Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ROS1 Expression and Histopathological Grading in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients at Tertiary Hospitals in Medan, Indonesia Nurul Syuhada Parinduri; Noni Novisari Soeroso; Desfrina Kasuma; Putri Chairani Eyanoer; Darren Wan-Teck Lim
Jurnal Respirasi Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): May 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jr.v12-I.2.2026.126-131

Abstract

Introduction: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with most cases classified as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Genetic alterations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS), mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET), and c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) play important roles in guiding targeted therapy strategies. This study aimed to evaluate ROS1 expression in patients with histopathologically confirmed NSCLC and to determine its association with histopathological grading and tumor subtype. Methods: This analytical observational study employed a cross-sectional design using 120 paraffin-embedded tissue samples obtained from NSCLC patients at several hospitals in Medan, Indonesia, between March 2024 and March 2025. Associations were analyzed using the Chi-square test, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Adenocarcinoma was the predominant histopathological subtype, accounting for 75% of cases. Positive ROS1 expression was identified in 64.2% of patients. A significant association was observed between ROS1 expression and histopathological grading (p=0.048), whereas no significant association was found between ROS1 expression and histopathological subtype (p=0.742). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated limited diagnostic performance of ROS1 expression, with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.451. Conclusion: The ROS1 expression was significantly associated with histopathological grading but showed no correlation with histopathological subtype in NSCLC patients. The ROS1 immunohistochemistry may serve as a practical screening tool in NSCLC, although its diagnostic performance remains limited.
Assessment of Heavy Risk Factor Association with Lung Cancer Risk Using Questionnaire-Based Screening: A Cross-Sectional Study at Medan Johor Public Health Center, Medan, Indonesia Muhammad Azka Auliya; Noni Novisari Soeroso; Rina Amelia; Dina Arwina Dalimunthe; Darren Wan-Teck Lim
Jurnal Respirasi Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): January 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jr.v12-I.1.2026.6-12

Abstract

Introduction: Lung cancer remains a major public health concern in Indonesia, characterized by high morbidity and mortality rates. Effective prevention and management strategies necessitate the accurate identification of lung cancer risk factors. The questionnaire was developed and validated as a screening tool to evaluate risk factors and generate lung cancer risk scores. This study aimed to assess the questionnaire’s utility for identifying lung cancer risk factors and categorizing risk levels among individuals at the Medan Johor Public Health Center, Medan, Indonesia. Methods: This study enrolled 180 subjects who met the inclusion criteria. These subjects were part of the population, specifically non-lung-cancer patients at the Medan Johor Public Health Center in Medan, Indonesia. A cross-sectional analytic design was used to examine the correlation between risk factors and risk levels. Results: Among 180 lung cancer patients screened, the tool classified most individuals into moderate- to high-risk strata and showed significant between-group differences for most risk factors (p<0.05). In addition, the Kenali Paru (NARU) screening tool is accessible, reproducible, and cost-effective, using a 14-item multiple-choice format (2-3 options per item) with weighted scoring that converts responses into a total risk score. Conclusion: The questionnaire demonstrates its effectiveness as a screening tool for identifying lung cancer risk factors and stratifying risk levels. Nevertheless, refinement is necessary to address its limitations, including the addition of tailored questions for sub-populations with specific comorbidities or health conditions.