Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sanskara Hukum dan HAM Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure
Mario Agritama S W Madjid
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Gadjah Mada
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Kerugian Keuangan Negara atas Penyalahgunaan Wewenang dalam Instrumen Hukum Administrasi Negara Mario Agritama S W Madjid; Muh. Ilham Akbar
Sanskara Hukum dan HAM Vol. 2 No. 02 (2023): Sanskara Hukum dan HAM (SHH)
Publisher : Eastasouth Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/shh.v2i02.268

Abstract

Penyelenggaraan pemerintahan negara perlu dikelola dalam suatu sistem pengelolaan keuangan negara secara terbuka, bertanggung jawab dan berpedoman pada asas tidak menyalahgunakan kewenangan. Tidak jarang penyalahgunaan wewenang terjadi yang berakibat pada kerugian keuangan negara di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dua hal, Pertama, pertanggungjawaban terhadap penyalahgunaan wewenang yang mengakibatkan kerugian keuangan negara; Kedua, peran hukum administrasi negara sebagai instrument pencegahan penyalahgunaan wewenang yang mengakibatkan kerugian keuangan negara. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan metode studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan: Pertama, kerugian keuangan negara karena kesalahan administratif maka pejabat pemerintahan yang bersangkutan wajib untuk mengembalikan kerugian keuangan negara dan terhadap pengembalian kerugian keuangan negara tersebut tidak menghapuskan dipidananya pelaku tindak pidana. Kedua, instrument hukum administrasi negara dapat berperan dalam mengatasi penyalahgunaan wewenang yang berakibat pada kerugian keuangan negara melalui beberapa hal, yakni, penguatan public governance, menerapkan closed system birokrasi. dan penguatan APIP sebagai pengawas internal pemerintah.
Reformulasi Sentra Penegakan Hukum Terpadu menjadi Lembaga Independen Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pemilu Mario Agritama S W Madjid
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 24 No 1 (2024): Edisi Maret
Publisher : Law Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law of The Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2024.V24.057-072

Abstract

The practice of implementing elections in Indonesia from time to time becomes an antinomy of the principle of honesty and fairness. This practice is evidenced by the increasing number of election violations, especially election crimes. This shows that the role of the Sentra Gakkumdu, which specifically functions to eradicate election crimes, has not been effective. The most highlighted issue regarding the existence of the Sentra Gakkumdu is the weak coordination and its limited nature as a forum between Bawaslu, the Police, and the Prosecutor's Office. This research aims to describe the problematics of election criminal law enforcement in Indonesia and the reformulation of Sentra Gakkumdu into an Independent Institution for Eradicating Election Crimes. This research was conducted using normative juridical research. The results of this study show: First, the ineffectiveness of election criminal enforcement is caused by the limited time for handling cases, the weak institutional building of Gakkumdu which includes institutional nature, authority, human resource capacity and coordination between institutions in it. Second, it is necessary to reformulate the Gakkumdu Center into an Independent Institution for the Eradication of Election Crimes. The idea of making Gakkumdu an Independent Institution departs from several weaknesses in the existing institutional building plus the complexity of handling election crimes and speedy trial design requires a special institution that focuses on handling the eradication of election crimes. The institution will later take the form of an independent institution with prevention and prosecution functions, while. The institutional structure will consist of investigators, investigators, and permanent public prosecutors led by commissioners.
Co-Authors Muh. Ilham Akbar