Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Perubahan Makna terhadap Pasal 2 dan 3 Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Prahassacitta, Vidya
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 15, No 3 (2018)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini, pertama: makna Pasal 2 ayat (1) dan Pasal 3 UU No. 31 Tahun 1999 pra dan pasca dikeluarkannya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 25/PUU-XIV/2016. Kedua, penerapan Pasal 2 ayat (1) dan Pasal 3 UU No. 31 Tahun 1999 pra Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 25/PUU-XIV/2016. Ketiga, efek dikeluarkannya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tersebut dalam meminimalisir kriminalisasi perbuatan pegawai negeri sipil atau pejabat publik. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Sebagai penelitian kualitatif maka data yang dipergunakan merupakan data sekunder yang terdiri dari data hukum primer, sekunder dan tertier yang diperoleh dari studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa putusan mahkamah konstitusi tersebut telah mengubah rumusan delik dari formil menjadi materiil yang menjadikan makna pasal tersebut semakin menjauh dari makna awalnya. Pada akhirnya, keluarnya putusan mahkamah konstitusi tersebut tidak dapat memecahkan permasalahan hukum yang telah ada sebelumnya bahkan putusan tersebut berpotensi menimbulkan permasalahan baru yang dapat menghambat proses penegakan hukum dalam pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia.The problems on this research are, first: the meaning of Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 UU No. 31 Year 1999 before and after Constitutional Court Decision Number 25/PUU-XIV/2016. Second, the application of Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 UU No. 31 Year 1999 before Constitutional Court Decision Number 25/ PUU-XIV/2016. Third, the effects of Constitutional Court Decision in minimizing criminal actions conducted by civil servants and public officials. This research is a legal research using normative legal approach. As qualitative research, this research uses secondary data consist of primary, secondary, tertiary legal data collected from literature study. The results show that the constitutional court decision has changed the formulation of the offense from formal to material which makes the meaning of the article different from its original meaning. At last, the constitutional court deciasion could not solve the existing legal problem, but contrary it potentially creates a new problem which obstructs law enforcement process in combating corruption in Indonesia.

The Concept of Extraordinary Crime in Indonesia Legal System: is The Concept An Effective Criminal Policy? Prahassacitta, Vidya
Humaniora Vol 7, No 4 (2016): Humaniora
Publisher : Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/humaniora.v7i4.3604

The concept of extraordinary crime was a common concept in Indonesia. Adopts from the concept of the most serious crime in Rome Statute and adjusted with the Indonesian legal system. Then it developed wider and introduced into terrorism, corruption, drug abuse offenses, and child sexual abuse in legislations and Constitutional Court verdicts. The implementation of this concept generated some consequences in drafting and formulating the legislation as part of penal policy. This leads to two legal problems; first, what was the categorization of the concept of extraordinary crime? and second, what were the consequences of the concept extraordinary crime in accordance with penal policy?. Normative law research with literature study method, This was a conducted as the response of both legal problems. Using secondary data from legislation, Constitutional Court verdicts, book and journal, this research concludes that; the concept of extraordinary crime parts of criminal policy does not have any standard for the categorization. Then, as consequences of the implementation of the concept of extraordinary crime in several penal efforts are formulating in legislations. The penalty effort is not limited to criminalization and sentencing aspects but wider and shall be in line with the strategy of crime eradication and welfare protection purposes. To reach the effectiveness of the criminal policy of the concept of extraordinary crime, the penalty effort shall be in line with criminal law principles and human right basic principles.

Penghakiman oleh Pers Nasional: Suatu Kritik atas Kebebasan Pers dalam Pemberitaan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Prahassacitta, Vidya
Humaniora Vol 5, No 1 (2014): Humaniora
Publisher : Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/humaniora.v5i1.3013

The 1998 reform in Indonesia has changed freedom press in Indonesia. Now press implements libertarian model which puts freedom first instead of responsibility. Previously, press implemented soviet communist model which put responsibility first instead of freedom. Fifteen years later, press in Indonesia has become political tool by the owner of the press company who has high position in political party participating in the 2014 election. This reflects on the disproportional news regarding corruption cases conducted by the government officer or parliament member from the contender party. Such news delivers not only facts but also misleading opinions to the society which creates trial by the press. In fact, presumption of innocent principle is a foundation for press reporting news as stipulated in Law No. 40 Year 1999 concerning Press and Journalistic Code of Conduct. In libertarian press there are always borders but such borders are not effective since the freedom of press in Indonesia is powerful. Article used qualitative and library research with secondary sources of law to gain a solution to this problem. Therefore, Press Board should maximize its function in supervising the implementation of presumption of innocent principle and to raise society awareness regarding the law supremacy. In the end, to fulfill press social responsibility, a press profession court shall be established to keep press independency.

Citizen Journalism in Cyber Media: Protection and Legal Responsibility Under Indonesian Press Law Prahassacitta, Vidya
Humaniora Vol 8, No 1 (2017): Humaniora
Publisher : Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/humaniora.v8i1.3695

Phenomena of citizen journalism had accepted and become part of cyber media. Cyber media owned and managed by press companies had featured citizen journalists? information, critics, opinions, and news. Citizen journalism was part of freedom of expression. However, in Indonesia?s press law concept, it was not part of the national press. This created legal issues regarding protection and legal responsibility aspects for both parties. A qualitative research was conducting to solving these issues. Using secondary data from literature study and observation on several cyber media websites, this discovers two conclusions. First, the citizen journalist is part of freedom of the press; it means that a citizen journalist?s creation has protected form censor and bans. However, a citizen journalist still has a limitation which shall be complied videlicet Civil Code and Law No. 11 The year 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transaction. Violation of both regulations means that a citizen journalist shall be legally responsible. Second, protection and responsibility border between a citizen journalist and press company are based on an agreement. Approval of term and condition of general user content in a website from a citizen journalist means that both parties have agreed to enter into an agreement. A press company might be freed of its legal responsibility as long as conducted its obligation to control and manage contents that have been uploaded and published by a citizen journalist. If the company does not take proportional action against citizen journalist? contents that violating the law, the press company shall be requested its civil or criminal legal responsibility.

Perubahan Makna terhadap Pasal 2 dan 3 Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Vidya Prahassacitta
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 15, No 3 (2018)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini, pertama: makna Pasal 2 ayat (1) dan Pasal 3 UU No. 31 Tahun 1999 pra dan pasca dikeluarkannya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 25/PUU-XIV/2016. Kedua, penerapan Pasal 2 ayat (1) dan Pasal 3 UU No. 31 Tahun 1999 pra Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 25/PUU-XIV/2016. Ketiga, efek dikeluarkannya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tersebut dalam meminimalisir kriminalisasi perbuatan pegawai negeri sipil atau pejabat publik. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Sebagai penelitian kualitatif maka data yang dipergunakan merupakan data sekunder yang terdiri dari data hukum primer, sekunder dan tertier yang diperoleh dari studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa putusan mahkamah konstitusi tersebut telah mengubah rumusan delik dari formil menjadi materiil yang menjadikan makna pasal tersebut semakin menjauh dari makna awalnya. Pada akhirnya, keluarnya putusan mahkamah konstitusi tersebut tidak dapat memecahkan permasalahan hukum yang telah ada sebelumnya bahkan putusan tersebut berpotensi menimbulkan permasalahan baru yang dapat menghambat proses penegakan hukum dalam pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia.The problems on this research are, first: the meaning of Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 UU No. 31 Year 1999 before and after Constitutional Court Decision Number 25/PUU-XIV/2016. Second, the application of Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 UU No. 31 Year 1999 before Constitutional Court Decision Number 25/ PUU-XIV/2016. Third, the effects of Constitutional Court Decision in minimizing criminal actions conducted by civil servants and public officials. This research is a legal research using normative legal approach. As qualitative research, this research uses secondary data consist of primary, secondary, tertiary legal data collected from literature study. The results show that the constitutional court decision has changed the formulation of the offense from formal to material which makes the meaning of the article different from its original meaning. At last, the constitutional court deciasion could not solve the existing legal problem, but contrary it potentially creates a new problem which obstructs law enforcement process in combating corruption in Indonesia.

Penghakiman oleh Pers Nasional: Suatu Kritik atas Kebebasan Pers dalam Pemberitaan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Vidya Prahassacitta
Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 1 (2014): Humaniora
Publisher : Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/humaniora.v5i1.3013

The 1998 reform in Indonesia has changed freedom press in Indonesia. Now press implements libertarian model which puts freedom first instead of responsibility. Previously, press implemented soviet communist model which put responsibility first instead of freedom. Fifteen years later, press in Indonesia has become political tool by the owner of the press company who has high position in political party participating in the 2014 election. This reflects on the disproportional news regarding corruption cases conducted by the government officer or parliament member from the contender party. Such news delivers not only facts but also misleading opinions to the society which creates trial by the press. In fact, presumption of innocent principle is a foundation for press reporting news as stipulated in Law No. 40 Year 1999 concerning Press and Journalistic Code of Conduct. In libertarian press there are always borders but such borders are not effective since the freedom of press in Indonesia is powerful. Article used qualitative and library research with secondary sources of law to gain a solution to this problem. Therefore, Press Board should maximize its function in supervising the implementation of presumption of innocent principle and to raise society awareness regarding the law supremacy. In the end, to fulfill press social responsibility, a press profession court shall be established to keep press independency.

The Concept of Extraordinary Crime in Indonesia Legal System: is The Concept An Effective Criminal Policy? Vidya Prahassacitta
Humaniora Vol. 7 No. 4 (2016): Humaniora
Publisher : Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/humaniora.v7i4.3604

The concept of extraordinary crime was a common concept in Indonesia. Adopts from the concept of the most serious crime in Rome Statute and adjusted with the Indonesian legal system. Then it developed wider and introduced into terrorism, corruption, drug abuse offenses, and child sexual abuse in legislations and Constitutional Court verdicts. The implementation of this concept generated some consequences in drafting and formulating the legislation as part of penal policy. This leads to two legal problems; first, what was the categorization of the concept of extraordinary crime? and second, what were the consequences of the concept extraordinary crime in accordance with penal policy?. Normative law research with literature study method, This was a conducted as the response of both legal problems. Using secondary data from legislation, Constitutional Court verdicts, book and journal, this research concludes that; the concept of extraordinary crime parts of criminal policy does not have any standard for the categorization. Then, as consequences of the implementation of the concept of extraordinary crime in several penal efforts are formulating in legislations. The penalty effort is not limited to criminalization and sentencing aspects but wider and shall be in line with the strategy of crime eradication and welfare protection purposes. To reach the effectiveness of the criminal policy of the concept of extraordinary crime, the penalty effort shall be in line with criminal law principles and human right basic principles.

Citizen Journalism in Cyber Media: Protection and Legal Responsibility Under Indonesian Press Law Vidya Prahassacitta
Humaniora Vol. 8 No. 1 (2017): Humaniora
Publisher : Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/humaniora.v8i1.3695

Phenomena of citizen journalism had accepted and become part of cyber media. Cyber media owned and managed by press companies had featured citizen journalists’ information, critics, opinions, and news. Citizen journalism was part of freedom of expression. However, in Indonesia’s press law concept, it was not part of the national press. This created legal issues regarding protection and legal responsibility aspects for both parties. A qualitative research was conducting to solving these issues. Using secondary data from literature study and observation on several cyber media websites, this discovers two conclusions. First, the citizen journalist is part of freedom of the press; it means that a citizen journalist’s creation has protected form censor and bans. However, a citizen journalist still has a limitation which shall be complied videlicet Civil Code and Law No. 11 The year 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transaction. Violation of both regulations means that a citizen journalist shall be legally responsible. Second, protection and responsibility border between a citizen journalist and press company are based on an agreement. Approval of term and condition of general user content in a website from a citizen journalist means that both parties have agreed to enter into an agreement. A press company might be freed of its legal responsibility as long as conducted its obligation to control and manage contents that have been uploaded and published by a citizen journalist. If the company does not take proportional action against citizen journalist’ contents that violating the law, the press company shall be requested its civil or criminal legal responsibility.

DUALISME PANDANGAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG MENGENAI STATUS HUKUM TENAGA KERJA ASING Vidya Prahassacitta
Jurnal Yudisial Vol 7, No 2 (2014): DISPARITAS YUDISIAL
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v7i2.83

ABSTRAKPenggunaan tenaga kerja asing di pasar kerja Indonesia hanyalah untuk jabatan dan waktu tertentu. Hal tersebut diatur secara jelas dalam Undang-Undang No. 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan dan peraturan pelaksanaannya. Dalam praktiknya perjanjian kerja waktu tertentu antara pengusaha dengan tenaga kerja asing sering dibuat dengan tidak memenuhi ketentuan yang berlaku. Perjanjian kerja tersebut sering dibuat tidak tertulis dan tidak dalam bahasa Indonesia. Selain itu jangka waktu perjanjian kerja waktu tertentu tersebut yang melebihi jangka waktu yang telah ditentukan dalam undang-undang. Hal ini menimbulkan permasalahan hukum ketika terjadi perselisihan hubungan industrial terkait pemutusan hubungan kerja terkait dengan status hubungan kerja dan kompensasi PHK. Memang peraturan perundang-undangan tidak mengatur secara khusus mengenai perjanjian kerja waktu tertentu bagi tenaga kerja asing sehingga pelanggaran atas perjanjian kerja waktu tertentu tersebut mengakibatkan perjanjian kerja tersebut dinyatakan sebagai perjanjian kerja waktu tidak tertentu. Hal tersebut tidaklah tepat karena seharusnya terhadap perjanjian kerja waktu tertentu bagi tenaga kerja asing berlaku lex specialis. Dalam hal ini peran hakim menjadi penting dalam melakukan penemuan hukum untuk mengisi kekosongan hukum yang ada. Faktanya Mahkamah Agung sendiri tidak satu suara atas hal tersebut sebagaimana dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 595K/PDT.SUS/2010 dan No. 29PK/PDT.SUS/2010. Hal ini menimbulkan dualisme dalam putusan-putusan Mahkamah Agung. Kata kunci: perjanjian kerja, tenaga kerja asing, PHK.ABSTRACTThe employment of foreign workers in the Indonesian labor market is merely set for particular positions and a certain period of time as clearly stipulated in Law Number 13 of 2003 on Labor and its implementation regulations. In practice, temporary employment agreement between the employer and the foreign workers habitually does not meet the applicable regulations. The agreements are often unwritten and not set in Indonesian Language. Additionally, it has often exceeded the period of time set out in the law. This is a real issue that has resulted in legal problem, such as industrial disputes related to termination of employment concerning on employment status and compensation layoffs. Law and legislation do not specifically regulate on this temporary employment agreement for foreign workers, thus if there happens to be violations of the agreement, it would be stated as invalid agreement. This is not applicable, since the principle of lex specialis should have been deployed in such agreement between the employer and the foreign workers. In this regard, the role of judge to conduct lawful discovery is crucial to overcome a legal vacuum that could arise. But the fact that the Supreme Court does not agree with the terms as stated in the Decision number 595K/PDT.SUS/2010 and number 29PK/PDT.SUS/2010 has led to dualism in the majority of the Supreme Court’s decisions. Keywords: employment agreement, foreign workers, termination of employment.

MENYOAL PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PT IM2 DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Vidya Prahassacitta
Jurnal Yudisial Vol 9, No 1 (2016): DIVERGENSI TAFSIR
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v9i1.33

ABSTRAKPutusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 787 K/PID.Sus/2014 merupakan putusan perkara tindak pidana korupsi yang menghukum PT IM2 dengan pidana tambahan pembayaran ganti kerugian atas perbuatan terdakwa IA selaku Direktur Utama PT IM2 yang melanggar Pasal 2 ayat (1) jo. Pasal 18 ayat (1) dan (3) Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi jo. Pasal 55 ayat (1) ke-1 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Kejahatan korporasi ini berawal dari perjanjian kerja sama antara PT IM2 dengan PT I dalam penggunaan pita frekuensi radio 2.1 GHz secara melawan hukum. Menarik untuk meneliti mengenai bagaimana sistem pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi dalam perkara ini terutama dihubungkan dengan penerapan Pasal 2 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999. Melalui penelitian normatif hukum dengan studi kepustakaan disimpulkan bahwa doktrin identifikasi dipergunakan untuk mengidentifikasi kesalahan dari terdakwa kepada korporasi guna meminta pertanggungjawaban pidana baik pengurus maupun korporasi. Akan tetapi ditinjaudari penafsiran historis, penggunaan Pasal 2 ayat (1) tersebut tidaklah tepat dalam perkara ini karena pasal tersebut merupakan delik propria khusus untuk pegawai negeri. Pada akhirnya pengungkapan perkara kejahatan korporasi guna meminta pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi perlu didorong namun dengan memperhatikan penggunaan undang-undang yang sesuai dengan tindakpidana yang dilakukan.kata kunci: kejahatan korporasi, pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi, korupsi. ABSTRACTSupreme Court Decision Number 787 K/PID.Sus/2014 issued a ruling on the corruption case of PT IM2 with additional penalty payment of compensation for criminal offense committed by Defendant IA, President Director of PT IM2, in violation of Article 2 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 18, paragraph (1) and (3) of Law Number 31 of 1999 on Corruption Eradication in conjunction to Article 55 paragraph (1) item 1 of theCriminal Code. The corporate crime stemmed from the agreement between PT IM2 and PT I in an unlawful use of 2.1 GHz radio frequency band. How the system of corporate criminal liability in the case, especially in relation to the application of Article 2 paragraph(1) of Law Number 31 of 1999 is an int eresting issue to question. Through a normative legal research by literature study it can be concluded that doctrine of identification is used to identify the defendant’s mens rea towards corporation to ask for criminal liability eitherto the board or corporation. However, from historical interpretation, the application of Article 2 paragraph (1) is not appropriate in this case because the article is a delicta propria, which is specifically addressed to civil servants. At the end, the disclosure of corporate crime cases asking for criminal liability corporation should be encouraged by considering the most appropriate law that corresponds to criminal offenses committedKeywords: corporate crimes, corporate criminal liability, corruption.

Title

Found 17 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 17 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 17 Documents
Search