Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 17 Documents
Search

DISPARITAS PERLINDUNGAN KEBEBASAN BEREKSPRESI DALAM PENERAPAN PASAL PENGHINAAN UNDANG-UNDANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK Vidya Prahassacitta; Batara Mulia Hasibuan
Jurnal Yudisial Vol 12, No 1 (2019): POLITIK DAN HUKUM
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v12i1.299

Abstract

ABSTRAKPasal penghinaan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik sebagaimana telah diamandemen dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 merupakan pasal yang sering menimbulkan perdebatan. Penulis mengkaji putusan-putusan pengadilan periode tahun 2010-2016, dan menemukan rumusan masalah bagaimana disparitas penerapan pasal penghinaan dalam Pasal 27 ayat (3) jo. Pasal 45 Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, dan pada aspek perlindungan terhadap kebebasan berekspresi? Penelitian menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan kasus dilakukan untuk memperoleh jawaban. Analisis terhadap dua belas putusan pengadilan yang telah berkekuatan hukum tetap pada periode tahun 2010 sampai dengan 2016 diperoleh dua kesimpulan. Pertama, terjadi disparitas dalam penerapan Pasal 27 ayat (3) jo. Pasal 45 tersebut karena adanya disparitas ketika hakim menginterpretasikan unsur-unsur pasal tersebut. Kedua, terjadi disparitas dalam perlindungan kebebasan berekspresi akibat adanya disparitas tersebut, bahkan penerapan pasal tindak pidana penghinaan tersebut cenderung mengancam kebebasan berekspresi.Kata kunci: tindak pidana, penghinaan, kebebasan berekspresi. ABSTRACT Article of defamation in Law Number 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions as amended by Law Number 19 of 2016 is every so often debated. This analysis examines court decisions around the period 2010-2016 with the formulation of the problem of how inconsistent the application of the defamation article in Article 27 paragraph (3) juncto Article 45 of Information and Electronic Transactions Law, along with the aspect of freedom of expression protection. This study uses normative research methods with law and cases approach to obtain answers. Out from analyzing twelve court decisions with have permanent legal force from 2010 to 2016, two conclusions are obtained. First, there is disparity in the application of Article 27 paragraph (3) in conjunction with Article 45 because of the disparity when the judge interprets the elements of the article. Second, there is disparity in the protection of freedom of expression due to the difference; even the application of the criminal offense article tends to threaten freedom of expression. The contradiction must be between the decisions of the same court, or at the same level. Keywords: criminal act, defamation, freedom of expression.
MAKNA UPAH PROSES MENURUT MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DIBANDINGKAN DENGAN BEBERAPA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG Vidya Prahassacitta
Jurnal Yudisial Vol 6, No 3 (2013): PERTARUNGAN ANTARA KUASA DAN TAFSIR
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v6i3.99

Abstract

ABSTRAKPasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 37/PUU-IX/2011 tanggal 19 September 2011 menarik untuk melihat implementasi dari putusan tersebut. Mahkamah Konstitusi melalui putusannya telah memutuskan frase “belum ditetapkan” pada Pasal 155 ayat (2) Undang-Undang No. 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan bertentangan dengan Pasal 28D ayat (1) dan (2) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 dan tidak memiliki kekuatan hukum mengikat sepanjang tidak dimaknai belum berkekuatan hukum tetap. Bagaimana sikap Mahkamah Agung atas putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tersebut? Berdasarkan analisis yuridis dari beberapa putusan kasasi Mahkamah Agung mengenai perkara perselisihan hubungan industrial terkait pemutusan hubungan kerja dalam kurun waktu tahun 2011 sampai dengan 2013 ditemukan beberapa permasalahan hukum. Hal tersebut menyebabkan terjadinya berbeda penafsiran antara Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Agung. Perbedaan penafsiran tersebut mengenai pemberian upah selama proses pemutusan hubungan kerja atau yang dalam praktik dikenal sebagai upah proses. Besarnya upah proses yang ditafsirkan oleh Mahkamah Agung bukanlah sampai suatu putusan berkekuatan hukum tetap tetapi hanya sebanyak enam bulan upah saja. Dalam putusan-putusan Mahkamah Agung tersebut teridentifikasi beberapa dasar hukum yang memungkinkan bagi hakim untuk menafsirkan ketentuan Pasal 155 ayat (2) tersebut berbeda dengan penafsiran Mahkamah Konstitusi. Hal ini mengakibatkan ketidakselarasan interpretasi antara dua puncuk kekuasaan kehakiman di Indonesia tersebut.Kata kunci: berkekuatan hukum tetap, pemutusan hubungan kerja, upah proses.ABSTRACTAfter the issuance of Constitution Court decision No. 37/PUU-IX/2011 dated 19 September 2011, it is interesting to know how to implement such a decision in practice. Constitutional Court has decided that the phrase “belum ditetapkan” (not yet determined) of Article 155 paragraph (2) of Law No. 13 Year 2003 concerning Manpower is against article 28D paragraph; (1) and (2) of the 1945 Constitution and such phrase has no legal basis as long as it is not interpreted as yet final and binding. Now, how does the Supreme Court respond to the Constitutional Court decision? Based on legal analysis from several Supreme Court’s Cassation Decisions regarding industrial relation dispute related to employment termination from 2011 until 2013, the author of this article reveals several legal problems. There is a different interpretation between Constitution Court and Supreme Court regarding the payment of wage during termination process, so called “upah proses”. Supreme Court interprets that such “upah proses” must be paid for six months only, not up to the decision becoming final and binding. In those Supreme Court decisions, the multi-interpretation of Article 155 paragraph (2) has occurred and given rise to the inconsistencies between the two top Indonesian judicial institutions. Keywords: legal and binding, employment termination, “upah proses.”
Perubahan Makna terhadap Pasal 2 dan 3 Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Vidya Prahassacitta
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 15, No 3 (2018)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (377.128 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1533

Abstract

Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini, pertama: makna Pasal 2 ayat (1) dan Pasal 3 UU No. 31 Tahun 1999 pra dan pasca dikeluarkannya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 25/PUU-XIV/2016. Kedua, penerapan Pasal 2 ayat (1) dan Pasal 3 UU No. 31 Tahun 1999 pra Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 25/PUU-XIV/2016. Ketiga, efek dikeluarkannya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tersebut dalam meminimalisir kriminalisasi perbuatan pegawai negeri sipil atau pejabat publik. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Sebagai penelitian kualitatif maka data yang dipergunakan merupakan data sekunder yang terdiri dari data hukum primer, sekunder dan tertier yang diperoleh dari studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa putusan mahkamah konstitusi tersebut telah mengubah rumusan delik dari formil menjadi materiil yang menjadikan makna pasal tersebut semakin menjauh dari makna awalnya. Pada akhirnya, keluarnya putusan mahkamah konstitusi tersebut tidak dapat memecahkan permasalahan hukum yang telah ada sebelumnya bahkan putusan tersebut berpotensi menimbulkan permasalahan baru yang dapat menghambat proses penegakan hukum dalam pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia.The problems on this research are, first: the meaning of Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 UU No. 31 Year 1999 before and after Constitutional Court Decision Number 25/PUU-XIV/2016. Second, the application of Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 UU No. 31 Year 1999 before Constitutional Court Decision Number 25/ PUU-XIV/2016. Third, the effects of Constitutional Court Decision in minimizing criminal actions conducted by civil servants and public officials. This research is a legal research using normative legal approach. As qualitative research, this research uses secondary data consist of primary, secondary, tertiary legal data collected from literature study. The results show that the constitutional court decision has changed the formulation of the offense from formal to material which makes the meaning of the article different from its original meaning. At last, the constitutional court deciasion could not solve the existing legal problem, but contrary it potentially creates a new problem which obstructs law enforcement process in combating corruption in Indonesia.
SARANA PENAL DAN NON-PENAL DALAM MELINDUNGI KONSUMEN E-COMMERCE Prahassacitta, Vidya
Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Vol 12, No 2 (2023): Agustus 2023
Publisher : Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33331/rechtsvinding.v12i2.1227

Abstract

Undang-Undang informasi dan transaksi elektonik merupakan instrumen penting dalam melindungi konsumen E-Commerce. Undang-undang ini menggunakan sarana penal dan non penal untuk melindungi konsumen. Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk menganalisa intervensi hukum pidana dan menganalisa peran penyelenggara E-Commerce dalam memberikan perlindungan terhadap konsumen E-Commerce. Untuk menjawab permasalahan tersebut, peneliti melakukan penelitian dokumen dan menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa intervensi hukum pidana dalam memberikan perlindungan konsumen E-Commerce hanya dapat melindungi sebagian kepentingan hukum konsumen, sebagai pencegahan kerugian yang serius. Di sisi lain pengaturan peran penyelenggara E-Commerce merupakan sarana penting untuk mendukung penggunaan sarana penal dalam melindungi konsumen dalam mencegah potensi kerugian maupun dalam memulihkan kerugian konsumen. Untuk mendukung upaya perlindungan konsumen, revisi undang-undang informasi dan transaksi elektronik diperlukan. Perbaikan terhadap ketentuan pidana perlu dilakukan dengan mengedepankan prinsip ultimum remidium, serta memperluas pertanggung jawaban penyelenggara E-Commerce untuk mencegah dan memulihkan kerugian konsumen.
TINJAUAN ATAS KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP PENYUAPAN DI SEKTOR PRIVAT DALAM HUKUM NASIONAL INDONESIA: SUATU PERBANDINGAN DENGAN SINGAPURA, MALAYSIA DAN KOREA SELATAN Prahassacitta, Vidya
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Purpose of this research is to analyze private sector bribery penal policy in Indonesia. Although Indonesia ratified United Nation Convention Against Corruption, Indonesia has not implemented the convection’s provision of article 21 regarding the criminalization of private sector bribery. Analysis conducted using a functional method of comparative law from Konrad Zweigert and macro comparison against private sector bribery penal, which successfully applies in Singapore, Malaysia, and South Korea. Therefore, reflected from private sector bribery penal policy in Singapore, Malaysia, and South Korea thus Indonesia shall reformulate the private sector bribery provision which regulates in in current corruption act draft.
Human Dignity in the Criminal Process: A Lesson Learned from Torture Case in Germany Prahassacitta, Vidya
Indonesian Comparative Law Review Vol 6, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/iclr.v6i1.20297

Abstract

The research aims to analyze the prevising human dignity in the criminal process, especially in cases regarding torture for good purposes.  In the interrogation process, the preparator does not give any information about the hostage; at the same time, the hostage’s condition becomes critical.  Does harm given to the preparator without causing injuries within a short time to save a hostage be accepted and not violate human dignity? The researcher conducts document research and applies a comparative law approach to answer the question. The study compares Indonesian and German legal systems to show the different perspectives on the issue. The research shows that historical and cultural dimensions shape the concept of human dignity in each legal system, and it has a consequence with the idea of proportionally deterring torture for good purpose action. Under Germany's legal system, this action cannot be accepted because human dignity is the supreme value of the Constitution. It is a bit different from the Indonesian legal system, where the concept of human dignity shall maintain a balance between individual and community rights; the action might be accepted with strict requirements.
Anti-Pancasila Offence: Protection of National Security or Threat to Freedom of Speech Vidya Prahassacitta
Kosmik Hukum Vol 24, No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v24i2.21103

Abstract

The research discusses anti-Pancasila offenses in relation to national security and freedom of speech. Focus on the distribution of Communism, Marxism, and Leninism. Three research questions are the harm of spreading anti-Pancasila, the implementation of these offenses in court verdicts, and the formulation of these offenses in the new Penal Code. The research is document research using statutory and case approaches. Harm principles are used to analyze the research problems. Research results show that the distribution of Communism, Marxism, and Leninism has harmed other people, democratic states, and citizen exercising their fundamental rights. The implementation and formulation of these offenses in the new Penal Code also need help. Consequently, this offense cannot fulfill its objection to protecting national security interests; on the contrary, it becomes a threat to freedom of speech in the public sphere.Keywords: Anti-Pancasila, national security, freedom of speech