Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.244
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal INJURITY: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah
Agus Salim
Universitas Pamulang
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Tanggung Jawab PPAT Terhadap Pendaftaran Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah yang Menjadi Objek Sengketa Ditinjau dari PP Nomor 24 Tahun 2016 Iwan Chandra; Agus Salim; Belly Isnaeni
J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Vol. 3 No. 5: Agustus 2024
Publisher : CV. ULIL ALBAB CORP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/jceki.v3i5.4770

Abstract

This study explains the legal consequences of registering the transfer of land rights with a PPAT deed that becomes the object of a dispute and the responsibilities of PPAT in the context of Government Regulation Number 24 of 2016 concerning the Position Regulation of the Land Deed Official. The research is conducted using a normative juridical approach with legislative, conceptual, and case approaches. A qualitative method is used to analyze data descriptively with authority theory, liability theory, and legal certainty theory. Problems arise when the registration of the transfer of land rights is recorded in the land book because the rights become the object of a dispute, resulting in the return of documents by the land office. There is no regulation regarding the responsibility of PPAT for the return of these documents. The legal consequence of registering the transfer of rights that become the object of a dispute is the rejection of the registration by the local land office, preventing registration or changes to land data during the blocking period. PPAT is personally responsible for the execution of their duties and positions in making deeds, as stipulated in Article 55 of the Head of BPN Regulation No. 1 of 2006, which states that "PPAT is personally responsible for the execution of their duties and positions in making each deed." Additionally, PPAT also has administrative and civil responsibilities.
Pemenuhan Hak Kepemilikan Penerima Fidusia Terhadap Pemberi Fidusia yang Melakukan Wanprestasi Berdasarkan Akta Jaminan Fidusia Andi Widjaja; Agus Salim; Belly Isnaeni
J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Vol. 3 No. 5: Agustus 2024
Publisher : CV. ULIL ALBAB CORP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/jceki.v3i5.4831

Abstract

This research discusses the legal consequences of the fiduciary grantor's default in the Fiduciary Guarantee Deed and the fulfillment of the fiduciary recipient's rights. The study employs a normative juridical approach with legislative, conceptual, and case methods, as well as a descriptive qualitative approach. The research analyzes data based on the theory of legal certainty, the theory of dispute resolution, and the theory of agreements. The high interest in credit among the public has led to the creation of fiduciary agreements, which achieve legal certainty when the Fiduciary Guarantee Deed is signed before a Notary and registered with the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. However, questions arise regarding the rights of the fiduciary recipient if the Fiduciary Guarantee Deed is not registered. The deed stipulates that if the Debtor or Fiduciary Grantor defaults or is negligent and does not rectify the negligence or fulfill obligations after being given a written notice, such negligence is sufficient evidence of default. The Fiduciary Grantor's right to the Collateral Object ends. The fulfillment of the fiduciary recipient's rights over a defaulting fiduciary grantor can be achieved through agreed stages or by referring to the principal agreement.
Legal Ambiguity in Handling Cryptocurrency Evidence: Challenges and Solutions Kartono Kartono; Neva Sari Susanti; Samuel Soewita; Agus Salim; Ali Imron
Interdiciplinary Journal and Hummanity (INJURITY) Vol. 3 No. 11 (2024): INJURITY: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies.
Publisher : Pusat Publikasi Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58631/injurity.v3i11.1307

Abstract

This study explores the legal ambiguities and challenges in handling cryptocurrency evidence in criminal cases, particularly in Indonesia. Cryptocurrencies, with their decentralized and anonymous nature, are increasingly being used in illegal activities such as money laundering, fraud, and drug trafficking. The absence of clear regulations on the legal status and treatment of cryptocurrencies as evidence creates significant hurdles for law enforcement, including difficulties in seizure, identification of owners, and admissibility in court. By employing a qualitative approach with descriptive analysis, the study analyzed legal frameworks, conducted interviews with legal experts, and reviewed cases involving cryptocurrencies. Findings highlight the need for clear regulations defining the legal status of cryptocurrencies, structured training programs for law enforcement on blockchain technology, and international cooperation to address cross-border challenges. The study offers actionable recommendations, including legal reform, capacity building, and enhanced international collaboration, aiming to improve governance and ensure justice in cases involving cryptocurrency evidence.
Penerapan Prinsip Kepatuhan Hukum Bisnis (Legal Compliance) Perusahaan Tambang Skala Menengah dalam Menghadapi Hilirisasi Agus Salim; Bambang Wiyono
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Volume 5 Nomor 1 (Juli 2026 -
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jerkin.v5i1.7532

Abstract

Hilirisasi pertambangan mineral dan batubara (minerba) yang mewajibkan pengolahan dan pemurnian di dalam negeri menghadapkan pelaku usaha pada dinamika regulasi yang kompleks. Bagi perusahaan tambang skala menengah, kebijakan ini menimbulkan tantangan besar terkait keterbatasan modal, teknologi, dan infrastruktur smelter. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penerapan prinsip kepatuhan hukum bisnis (legal compliance) pada perusahaan tambang skala menengah dalam menghadapi hilirisasi, serta mengidentifikasi hambatan yuridis dan bisnis yang dihadapi dalam pemenuhan kewajiban tersebut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis empiris (sosio-legal) dengan spesifikasi penelitian deskriptif-analitis. Data diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan terhadap regulasi terkait serta wawancara dengan manajemen perusahaan tambang dan praktisi hukum bisnis. Analisis data dilakukan secara kualitatif untuk memahami kepatuhan hukum dari sudut pandang efektivitas pelaksanaan regulasi di lapangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan legal compliance pada perusahaan tambang skala menengah masih menghadapi kendala signifikan akibat ketidakpastian regulasi turunan, tingginya biaya investasi pemurnian, dan minimnya akses pembiayaan bank domestik untuk proyek hilirisasi. Sebagian besar perusahaan tambang menengah memilih strategi adaptasi bisnis berupa aliansi strategis (joint venture) atau kontrak pasokan jangka panjang dengan pemilik smelter skala besar guna menjaga keberlangsungan usaha (going concern). Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa instrumen hukum bisnis belum sepenuhnya akomodatif terhadap karakteristik finansial skala menengah. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan reformasi regulasi dalam bentuk insentif hukum, kemudahan perizinan integrasi hulu-hilir, dan skema pembiayaan khusus dari pemerintah untuk mendorong kepatuhan hukum yang berkelanjutan tanpa mematikan usaha pertambangan domestik.
Co-Authors Ali Imron Andi Widjaja Bambang Wiyono Belly Isnaeni Iwan Chandra Kartono Kartono Neva Sari Susanti Samuel Soewita