Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Mitra Sains
Hartono D. Mamu
Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Sains Pascasarjana Universitas Tadulako
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kognitif Tentang Biologi Siswa Berkemampuan Akademik Tinggi Dan Berkemampuan Akademik Rendah Kelas XI Di SMA Negeri 1 Palu Lita Iriani; Hartono D. Mamu; Lilies N. Tangge
Mitra Sains Vol 3 No 3 (2015): Juli
Publisher : Universitas Tadulako

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22487/mitrasains.v3i3.110

Abstract

The research aimed at investigating the effect of model of cooperative learning Type jigsaw, academic ability of student, and interaction between learning model with the level of academic ability, on the cognitive learning outcomes of student. The method used is quasi-experimental pretest-posttest 2 x 2 factorial pattern. The research sample is determined with random sampling. The class selected as the research sample was class XI IPA 1, XI IPA 3, XI IPA 6, and XI IPA 7. The data was collected by using the cognitive achievement test typical the multiple choice Data obtained was the primary data, which directly analyzed descriptively and analysis of covariance. Results of the data analysis at significance level α = 0.05 is as follow: (1) the cognitive learning outcomes of student that were learned by the model of cooperative learning type jigsaw (mean = 82.22) was higher than the cognitive learning outcomes of student that were learned with the conventional learning (mean = 73.56) with a significance value of 0.000. (2) The cognitive learning outcomes of student who have the high level academic ability (mean = 85.10) was higher than the cognitive learning outcomes of student who have lower level of academic ability (mean = 72.36) with a significance value of 0.000. (3) There is an interaction effect between the model of cooperative learning with the academic abilitywith the significance value of 0.002 was obtained in this case. Based on the results of this research, it can be concluded that: The model of cooperative learning type jigsaw, the academic ability, and the interaction between the model of cooperative learning with the academic ability effect on the cognitive learning outcomes.
Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Team Achievement Division Untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Siswa di Kelas IV SDN Kawatuna Nasmin Baso Ali; I Komang Werdhiana; Hartono D. Mamu
Mitra Sains Vol 4 No 2 (2016): April
Publisher : Universitas Tadulako

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22487/mitrasains.v4i2.171

Abstract

The problem in this study was the lack of student activities and low learning outcomes of students in science subject at fourth grade SDN Kawatuna Palu. This study was classroom action research consist of two cycles. Each cycle consists of two meetings. The stages of every cycle were planning, action, observation and reflection. By through the six phases of Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) learning, that students activity and student learning outcomes on the material force and motion of objects might increase. The activity of student in first cycle reached 72.7%, (good categories according to Likert scale), teacher activity reached 75% (good categories) and learning outcomes in the form of classical completeness reached 59.4% (enough category). In the second cycle, the student activity reached 84.9% and teacher reached 87.5%, the result of classical completeness increased up to 100%. These results provide a positive impact in improving the activity and student learning outcomes. STAD might made students more familiar and more active in learning. Familiar means that students work together in completing the LKS group, they cooperate by accepting the differences of each member of the group. Active in this case was students more active to ask and answer the question, both of teachers and of other groups at the time of the learning process.
Co-Authors I Komang Werdhiana Lilies N. Tangge Lita Iriani Nasmin Baso Ali