Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analysing the Legal Dynamics Involved in the Development of New Renewable Energy in Indonesia, Focussing on Regulations and the Challenges Faced During Implementation Hendra Dinatha; Fauzie Yusuf Hasibuan; Basuki Rekso Wibowo
International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): September : International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijlcj.v1i3.195

Abstract

Energy is an essential requirement for civilisation, and due to the rapid expansion of the population in Indonesia, energy consumption has also experienced a substantial rise. Hence, it is crucial to utilise and enhance the capacity of sustainable energy resources present across the archipelago, including geothermal, hydropower, wind, bioenergy (including bioethanol, biodiesel, and biomass), ocean current energy, nuclear, and solar energy. Indonesia's energy strategy is currently focused on the use of renewable energy to decrease carbon emissions. This is backed by legislation that promotes the development of renewable energy programs under the National Energy strategy. This article evaluates the regulatory factors associated with the advancement of new renewable energy and its influence on the establishment of sustainable energy infrastructure in Indonesia. This research provides a comprehensive legal analysis of the changing regulations surrounding renewable energy. It examines how these regulations affect the establishment of sustainable energy infrastructure and investigates the current legal consequences. The study aims to understand how the regulatory framework can either support or impede the progress of renewable energy development. This research offers valuable insights on the role of legislation in facilitating the shift towards sustainable energy sources in Indonesia. It also sheds light on the potential obstacles and advantages that may arise during this transition.
Legal Strength of Village Head Certificate As a Basis for Land Ownership Rights Esau Djaha; Basuki Rekso Wibowo; Dedy Ardian Prasetyo
Asian Journal of Social and Humanities Vol. 3 No. 5 (2025): Asian Journal of Social and Humanities
Publisher : Pelopor Publikasi Akademika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59888/ajosh.v3i5.508

Abstract

Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) in Article 19 mandates the implementation of land registration with the aim of providing legal certainty and protection. The research method used is normative juridical with an analytical approach, with a descriptive analytical specification. Normatively (das-sollen), the provisions regulated in the legislation always state that the purpose of land registration is to achieve legal certainty through the issuance of certificates. Empirically (das-sein), the reality in practice shows that land conflicts are cross-sectoral issues, where each sector has its own rules that overlap with one another. This correlates with differences in perceptions and relations between the parties involved in the agrarian conflict itself. The research findings show that the court's decision in resolving land conflicts with evidence of Village Certificates / Land Certificates is as follows: In practice, it turns out that obtaining a certificate is not as easy as the ideal condition it should be. Constraints such as distance from the administrative center, untidy and overlapping records, difficulties in field verification facilities, and various other obstacles make obtaining a certificate not a simple task. Village Certificates (SKD)/Land Certificates (SKT) are factually easier to obtain because they only require the authority of the village and records available at the village head's office. SKD/SKT is actually a supporting document and not a primary document, but in court, this document can serve as valid evidence of land ownership rights, replacing the primary certificate due to the significant role of the judge.