Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Analisis Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Pada Pembakaran Lahan Berdasarkan Teori Strict Liability Cristian Andros; Gunawan Djajaputera
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.1986

Abstract

Forest and land fires have widespread and serious impacts. Environmentally, these fires cause ecosystem damage, loss of biodiversity, and contribute to climate change through high carbon emissions. In terms of health, the smoke produced from forest fires can cause respiratory problems and other diseases in local communities. Law no. 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management (UUPPLH) regulates the principle of strict liability which is limited to cases involving the use and management of Hazardous and Toxic Substances (B3). Article 88 of the UUPPLH states that every person whose actions pose a serious threat to the environment as a result of the use or management of B3 waste is absolutely responsible for the losses incurred without the need for proof of fault. The explanation of Article 88 also emphasizes that this principle is applied in the context of civil lawsuits, not criminal ones. In the Meulaboh District Court Decision Number 54/Pid.Sus/2014/PN.MBO, PT. Surya Panen Subur (SPS) was charged with Article 108 Jo Article 69 paragraph (1) letter h Jo Article 116 paragraph (1) letter a UUPPLH Jo. Article 64 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. The judge decided that PT. SPS is criminally responsible based on the principle of strict liability due to the burning of land managed by the company. However, this approach shows a lack of rigor and inconsistency in legal considerations.
Analisis Efektifitas Non-Litigasi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Cinda Yanti; Gunawan Djajaputera
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i1.3192

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis efektifitas pendekatan non-litigasi dalam menjalankan upaya penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan. Pendekatan penelitian yang ditempuh berupa pendekatan kualitatif, melalui desain penelitian hukum empiris normatif, dengan mengacu pada peraturan perundang-undangan berupa UUD 1945 Pasal 33 ayat 3 beserta dengan UU RI No 5 Tahun 1960 yang membahas agraria. Temuan penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa terdapat beberapa faktor yang dapat memberikan pengaruh atas keberhasilan litigasi dalam kegiatan penyelesaian sengketa tanah, diantaranya adalah kualitas arbiter atau mediator, keterbukaan serta komunikasi antara pihak yang bersangkutan, kepentingan yang berbeda, ketersediaan informasi beserta data akurat, budaya dan sosial, fasilitas beserta dukungan dari institusi, maupun ketentuan hukum dan kebijakan. Kunci dari efektifitas non-litigasi terletak pada waktu yang dibutuhkan untuk mencapai kesepakatan, biaya yang minim, fleksibilitas yang tinggi, serta komunikasi yang konstruktif dan terbuka yang terjalin antara pihak.
Analisis Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Pada Pembakaran Lahan Berdasarkan Teori Strict Liability Cristian Andros; Gunawan Djajaputera
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.1986

Abstract

Forest and land fires have widespread and serious impacts. Environmentally, these fires cause ecosystem damage, loss of biodiversity, and contribute to climate change through high carbon emissions. In terms of health, the smoke produced from forest fires can cause respiratory problems and other diseases in local communities. Law no. 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management (UUPPLH) regulates the principle of strict liability which is limited to cases involving the use and management of Hazardous and Toxic Substances (B3). Article 88 of the UUPPLH states that every person whose actions pose a serious threat to the environment as a result of the use or management of B3 waste is absolutely responsible for the losses incurred without the need for proof of fault. The explanation of Article 88 also emphasizes that this principle is applied in the context of civil lawsuits, not criminal ones. In the Meulaboh District Court Decision Number 54/Pid.Sus/2014/PN.MBO, PT. Surya Panen Subur (SPS) was charged with Article 108 Jo Article 69 paragraph (1) letter h Jo Article 116 paragraph (1) letter a UUPPLH Jo. Article 64 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. The judge decided that PT. SPS is criminally responsible based on the principle of strict liability due to the burning of land managed by the company. However, this approach shows a lack of rigor and inconsistency in legal considerations.