Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research Jurist-Diction
Muhammad Asrul Maulana
Airlangga University
Computer Science & IT Electrical & Electronics Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Distribution of Legal Research Topics on Artificial Intelligence: A Bibliometric Study Muhammad Asrul Maulana; Savira Aristi
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research Vol 8, No 2 (2024): December 2024
Publisher : STMIK Dharma Wacana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29099/ijair.v8i2.1237

Abstract

This study aims to determine the distribution of legal research topics related to Artificial Intelligence. This study uses the lens of an indexing institution, to find raw data on the research distribution. The method used is Bibliometric analysis. The results of the research found that this study showed the keywords (Co-Occurrence) were divided into 3 clusters which had a total of 49 topics. Based on the collaboration of authors (Co-Authorship) has 1 cluster which includes 194 authors. Out of a total of 385,943 search results for scientific work, the most prolific author is Wei Wang with 361 documents created by journal articles. Meanwhile, research with the keyword Artificial Intelligence experienced fluctuating developments and the most publications occurred in 2022 with a total of 42,483 publications.
Gender Superiority and Consent Mechanisms in Abortion Regulation in Indonesia Ni Ketut Indhira Maharani; Muhammad Asrul Maulana; Dewi Rhosita Hayati
Jurist-Diction Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): Volume 9 No. 2, Mei 2026
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jd.v9i2.85102

Abstract

The main issue of this study concerns the consent requirement for abortion that provides space for or mandates the involvement of the husband, which creates tension with the principle of women’s bodily autonomy. Such a consent construction has the potential to reinforce gender superiority by placing women’s reproductive decisions under the control of another party. This research employs a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings show that the consent mechanism forms a hierarchical structure that often restricts women’s autonomy, although exceptions exist in cases of sexual violence and medical emergencies. This condition indicates the need for ius constituendum to formulate a fairer, women-centered abortion consent mechanism aligned with gender equality principles. The study concludes that the consent mechanism must better adhere to bodily autonomy, gender equality, and legal certainty. Keywords: Consent; Abortion; Gender Superiority
Co-Authors Dewi Rhosita Hayati Ni Ketut Indhira Maharani Savira Aristi