Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Distribution of Legal Research Topics on Artificial Intelligence: A Bibliometric Study Muhammad Asrul Maulana; Savira Aristi
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research Vol 8, No 2 (2024): December 2024
Publisher : STMIK Dharma Wacana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29099/ijair.v8i2.1237

Abstract

This study aims to determine the distribution of legal research topics related to Artificial Intelligence. This study uses the lens of an indexing institution, to find raw data on the research distribution. The method used is Bibliometric analysis. The results of the research found that this study showed the keywords (Co-Occurrence) were divided into 3 clusters which had a total of 49 topics. Based on the collaboration of authors (Co-Authorship) has 1 cluster which includes 194 authors. Out of a total of 385,943 search results for scientific work, the most prolific author is Wei Wang with 361 documents created by journal articles. Meanwhile, research with the keyword Artificial Intelligence experienced fluctuating developments and the most publications occurred in 2022 with a total of 42,483 publications.
From Hashtag to Policy: Viral Anger and Lawmaking in Indonesia’s Digital Democracy Ameylia Puspita Rosa Dyah Ayu Arintyas; Savira Aristi; Muhammad Asrul Maulana
Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): January - June
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grlspr.v5i2.1949

Abstract

This study analyzes how viral digital mobilization translated public anger into policy responses in Indonesia through the 2025 #BubarkanDPR and 17+8 Tuntutan Rakyat movements. While #BubarkanDPR (“Disband the House of Representatives”) emerged as a symbolic critique of legislative privilege and accountability deficits, the 17+8 platform converted diffuse online outrage into twenty-five structured reform demands. Using a qualitative case study integrating digital discourse analysis, media triangulation, and legal document review, the research examines the interaction between emotional mobilization, elite response, and constitutional constraints. The findings demonstrate that viral anger operated as political pressure producing three outcomes: institutional concessions, including suspension of housing allowances and transparency commitments; disciplinary sanctions against legislators after controversial remarks; and activation of oversight mechanisms such as ethics reviews and human rights investigations. However, the core demand to dissolve parliament was constitutionally barred under Article 7C of the amended 1945 Constitution, underscoring structural limits. The study argues that in Indonesia’s digital democracy, virality constitutes contingent political legitimacy, capable of triggering short-term accountability but insufficient to transform entrenched power structures.