Utih Amartiwi
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Fenomena Disinformasi Vaksinasi Covid-19 pada Remaja di Kabupaten Jombang tyvani audia rizki; Widhiadi Yoga Sembada; Utih Amartiwi
Communications Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): COMMUNICATIONS
Publisher : Prodi S1 Ilmu Komunikasi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Hukum, Universitas Negeri Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21009/communications.6.1.5

Abstract

This study looks at how disinformation regarding Covid-19 affects the process of making vaccination decisions for adolescents aged 12 to 17 years in Jombang Regency. The increase in the spread of disinformation related to Covid-19, which contains information that lacks credibility in the content of the information available,  creates various negative perspectives from its readers towards the Covid-19 vaccination, which, as stated by WHO, has spread disinformation and caused confusion, suspicion, as well as negative sentiment towards the Covid-19 vaccination. In addition to vaccine skepticism and skepticism, public health has long been the target of foreign disinformation campaigns, including conspiracy theories, as part of the larger struggle for national security (Boghardt, 2009; Ellick & Westbrook, 2018). With the influence of rampant disinformation on various social media, the suspicion of vaccination is increasing, which gives a negative view. This study used a qualitative approach with a phenomenological study method. Data collection techniques were carried out by means of FGD (Forum Group Discussion) and interviews. The results of the study show that Covid-19 disinformation has a role in the decision-making process for youth vaccination aged 12-17 years in Jombang. However, with this, there are still other factors that influence the decision, namely related to the role of community leaders around. This study used a qualitative approach with a phenomenological study method. Data collection techniques were carried out by means of FGD (Forum Group Discussion) and interviews. The results of the study show that Covid-19 disinformation has a role in the decision-making process for youth vaccination aged 12-17 years in Jombang Regency. However, with this, there are still other factors that influence the decision, namely related to the role of community leaders around. This study used a qualitative approach with the phenomenological study method. Data collection techniques were carried out by means of FGD (Forum Group Discussion) and interviews. The results of the study show that Covid-19 disinformation has a role in the decision-making process for youth vaccination aged 12-17 years in Jombang Regency. However, with this, there are still other factors that influence the decision, namely related to the role of community leaders around. Keywords: Disinformation; Vaccination; Decisions
Public Voices and Cyber Controversy: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the #Bjorka Trending Topic on Twitter (X) Tasya Salsabilla Dirgantari; Drina Intyaswati; Utih Amartiwi
CHANNEL: Jurnal Komunikasi Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): CHANNEL: Jurnal Komunikasi 27th Edition
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.12928/channel.v13i2.1317

Abstract

Trending topics on Twitter (X) play a significant role in highlighting public-interest issues. This study aims to examine the meanings constructed in tweets related to the trending hashtag #Bjorka on Twitter (X). A descriptive qualitative approach was employed, with data collected through textual observation, data scraping, and documentation. The analysis was conducted using Teun A. van Dijk’s critical discourse analysis model across three dimensions: text, social cognition, and social context. In the textual dimension, many tweets expressed frustration and sarcasm toward the government and police for their perceived incompetence in handling the Bjorka case. In the social cognition dimension, tweet authors interpreted that Bjorka was not an actual hacker. In the social context dimension, the public demanded accountability. This study contributes to digital discourse research by demonstrating how public narratives can shift from an initial issue to broader political criticism, underscoring the need for further research on news patterns and issue framing in shaping public discourse. The findings are expected to serve as a reference for both the public and the Indonesian government—particularly the Ministry of Communication and Digital Affairs (Komdigi), the National Cyber and Crypto Agency (BSSN), and the Indonesian National Police (Polri)—to take a more proactive role in addressing cybercrime and strengthening personal data security systems, thereby restoring public trust and preventing similar incidents in the future.