Aurelia Andrapradeshtya Nur
Universitas Tarumanagara

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Turki Membatasi Ekspor Produk Ke Israel Hingga Terjadinya Gencatan Senjata Aurelia Andrapradeshtya Nur; Nabilah Tia Azzahra; Sarazatin Ananda Muslih
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 8 No 1 (2024): Juni 2024
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31316/jk.v8i1.6307

Abstract

Abstrak Keputusan Turki untuk membatasi ekspor produk ke Israel hingga terjadinya gencatan senjata telah menarik perhatian dunia internasional. Ini mencerminkan dinamika kompleks dalam hubungan antara kedua negara serta konflik yang berkepanjangan di Timur Tengah. Keputusan ini tampaknya didorong oleh pertimbangan politik, ekonomi, dan sosial yang melibatkan solidaritas dengan rakyat Palestina, pengaruh regional, dan upaya untuk mendukung proses perdamaian. Turki telah mengadopsi pendekatan yang lebih kritis terhadap Israel dalam beberapa tahun terakhir, terutama di bawah pemerintahan Partai Keadilan dan Pembangunan (AKP). Pembatasan ekspor produk ke Israel oleh Turki juga dapat memiliki dampak ekonomi yang signifikan bagi kedua negara, serta implikasi politik yang lebih luas di wilayah Timur Tengah. Gencatan senjata di wilayah tersebut menawarkan kesempatan bagi negara-negara terlibat untuk mencari solusi politik jangka panjang terhadap konflik yang berkepanjangan. Dalam konteks ini, keputusan Turki dapat dipandang sebagai upaya untuk mendukung proses gencatan senjata dan mendorong dialog damai antara Israel dan Palestina. Namun, keputusan tersebut juga dapat mempengaruhi dinamika politik dan keamanan di Timur Tengah secara lebih luas, serta hubungan Turki dengan negara-negara lain di wilayah tersebut. Kata Kunci: Ekspor Produk, Gencatan Senjata, Konflik Israel-Palestina. Abstract Turkey's decision to limit exports to Israel until a ceasefire has drawn international attention. This reflects the complex dynamics in the relationship between the two countries and the ongoing conflict in the Middle East. The decision appears to be driven by political, economic, and social considerations involving solidarity with the Palestinian people, regional influence, and efforts to support the peace process. Turkey has adopted a more critical approach to Israel in recent years, particularly under the Justice and Development Party (AKP) government. Turkey's restriction on exporting products to Israel may also have significant economic implications for both countries, as well as broader political implications in the Middle East region. The ceasefire in the region offers an opportunity for the involved countries to seek long-term political solutions to the ongoing conflict. In this context, Turkey's decision can be seen as an effort to support the ceasefire process and encourage peaceful dialogue between Israel and Palestine. However, the decision may also affect the broader political and security dynamics in the Middle East, as well as Turkey's relations with other countries in the region.. Keywords: Export of Products, Ceasefire, Israel-Palestine Conflict.
Turki Membatasi Ekspor Produk Ke Israel Hingga Terjadinya Gencatan Senjata Aurelia Andrapradeshtya Nur; Nabilah Tia Azzahra; Sarazatin Ananda Muslih
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 7 No 2 (2023): Desember 2023
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31316/jk.v8i1.6307

Abstract

Abstrak Keputusan Turki untuk membatasi ekspor produk ke Israel hingga terjadinya gencatan senjata telah menarik perhatian dunia internasional. Ini mencerminkan dinamika kompleks dalam hubungan antara kedua negara serta konflik yang berkepanjangan di Timur Tengah. Keputusan ini tampaknya didorong oleh pertimbangan politik, ekonomi, dan sosial yang melibatkan solidaritas dengan rakyat Palestina, pengaruh regional, dan upaya untuk mendukung proses perdamaian. Turki telah mengadopsi pendekatan yang lebih kritis terhadap Israel dalam beberapa tahun terakhir, terutama di bawah pemerintahan Partai Keadilan dan Pembangunan (AKP). Pembatasan ekspor produk ke Israel oleh Turki juga dapat memiliki dampak ekonomi yang signifikan bagi kedua negara, serta implikasi politik yang lebih luas di wilayah Timur Tengah. Gencatan senjata di wilayah tersebut menawarkan kesempatan bagi negara-negara terlibat untuk mencari solusi politik jangka panjang terhadap konflik yang berkepanjangan. Dalam konteks ini, keputusan Turki dapat dipandang sebagai upaya untuk mendukung proses gencatan senjata dan mendorong dialog damai antara Israel dan Palestina. Namun, keputusan tersebut juga dapat mempengaruhi dinamika politik dan keamanan di Timur Tengah secara lebih luas, serta hubungan Turki dengan negara-negara lain di wilayah tersebut. Kata Kunci: Ekspor Produk, Gencatan Senjata, Konflik Israel-Palestina. Abstract Turkey's decision to limit exports to Israel until a ceasefire has drawn international attention. This reflects the complex dynamics in the relationship between the two countries and the ongoing conflict in the Middle East. The decision appears to be driven by political, economic, and social considerations involving solidarity with the Palestinian people, regional influence, and efforts to support the peace process. Turkey has adopted a more critical approach to Israel in recent years, particularly under the Justice and Development Party (AKP) government. Turkey's restriction on exporting products to Israel may also have significant economic implications for both countries, as well as broader political implications in the Middle East region. The ceasefire in the region offers an opportunity for the involved countries to seek long-term political solutions to the ongoing conflict. In this context, Turkey's decision can be seen as an effort to support the ceasefire process and encourage peaceful dialogue between Israel and Palestine. However, the decision may also affect the broader political and security dynamics in the Middle East, as well as Turkey's relations with other countries in the region.. Keywords: Export of Products, Ceasefire, Israel-Palestine Conflict.
Demonstrations and Legislators' Responses from the Perspective of the Sociological School of Law Aurelia Andrapradeshtya Nur; Fadia Zahra Hanan; Gabriela Gunawan; Nabilah Tia Azzahra; Revan Filbert Nathaniel Tius
Tarumanagara Law Review Vol. 7 No. I (2025): Talrev-Untar
Publisher : Faculty of Law Tarumanagara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/talrev.v7iI.38909

Abstract

As a rechtstaat (rule-of-law state), Indonesia constitutionally guarantees the freedom of assembly, including public demonstrations, under Article 28E(3) of the 1945 Constitution. In practice, however, these articulations of public dissent are frequently met with repressive state actions, reflecting a prevailing formalistic legal paradigm. This paradigm reduces law to a mere instrument of public order, consequently disregarding complex social realities. This research analyzes the phenomenon of public demonstrations and the corresponding legislative responses through the theoretical lens of sociological jurisprudence. Employing a normative-empirical juridical methodology, the study utilizes secondary data acquired via comprehensive library research. The findings reveal that sociological jurisprudence, pioneered by Roscoe Pound and Eugen Ehrlich, conceptualizes law not as static statutes (law in books), but dynamically as living law and as law as a tool of social engineering. From this perspective, demonstrations—such as the widespread protests against the Omnibus Law are interpreted not as mere legal infractions, but as vital manifestations of this living law and essential social feedback. They signify a profound chasm between formal positive law and the public’s substantive sense of justice. Therefore, it is concluded that legislators aligned with a sociological perspective must eschew repressive reactions, adopting instead dialogical, participatory, and responsive engagement. Such a legislative response is imperative for substantive policy correction, reinforcing legal legitimacy, and ensuring the legal framework functions to achieve genuine social justice rather than existing solely as an instrument of power.