Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Humaniora : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Ekonomi dan Hukum
Via Susanti Via Susanti
Universitas Teuku Umar
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Penerapan Konsep Restorative Justice Pada Kasus Pelecehan Seksual (studi Penetapan Nomor 9/JN/2021/MS.Skm) Via Susanti Via Susanti; Eza Aulia
Jurnal Humaniora : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Ekonomi dan Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2023): Oktober 2023
Publisher : Center for Research and Community Service (LPPM) University of Abulyatama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30601/humaniora.v7i2.4033

Abstract

The application of restorative justice based on Determination Number 9/JN/2021/MS.Skm is applied to cases of sexual harassment. In the case of sexual harassment the defendant and 3 (three) other defendants forced and threatened the victim to take turns harassing them. In this case, the judge determines that there is restorative justice in sexual harassment cases, where the defendant should be punished for the actions he committed to get a lesson and a deterrent effect. The consideration of the judge is to accept the existence of restorative justice in cases of sexual harassment and the judge makes legal findings that are not appropriate in the case. From this background, the authors put forward 2 problem formulations, namely the consideration of restorative justice applied to Designation Number 9/JN/2021/MS.Skm and the legal consequences of applying restorative justice to Determination Number 9/JN/2021/MS.Skm. This study uses a normative juridical method. When considering sexual harassment the judge made a legal discovery, the legal finding was inappropriate because sexual harassment is a serious case and violates human rights. Meanwhile, the legal consequences of implementing restorative justice do not have a deterrent effect for the defendant, because the defendant can repeat the same crime again. The conclusion is that in this case, the judge was wrong in making legal findings, because the legal findings from the judge could not be applied to cases of sexual harassment, legal findings were made when there was a legal vacuum, while sexual harassment had rules that governed it.
Co-Authors Aulia, Eza