Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Relationship Between Social Sciences and Social Sciences: Resources and Energy Eka Yusnaldi; Dwi Retno Anjani; Asyura Asyura; Jihan Ramadhani Faizera; Yulinda Ritonga; Viola Putri
Education Achievement: Journal of Science and Research Volume 5 Issue 2 July 2024
Publisher : Pusdikra-Publishing.com

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51178/jsr.v5i2.1932

Abstract

The aim of this research is to find out the relationship between social sciences and social sciences and society. Social sciences can play an important role in social education, because they provide the opportunity to understand relationships between humans more systematically and be able to apply them in everyday life. Social education is broader than social science and is not limited to one area of the curriculum, or to education within schools. The social sciences that have made many contributions to Social Sciences are Geography, History and Pancasila Moral Education. Besides that, a lot of material is needed from Anthropology, Sociology, Political Science, Economics, Psychology, Philosophy and sometimes even Natural Science.
Reconstructing Critical Thinking in Islamic Higher Education: Integrating Classical Epistemology and Contemporary Pedagogy Junaidi Arsyad; Usiono Usiono; Retno Sayekti; Eka Yusnaldi; Budiman Budiman; Subaidi Subaidi
International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Vol 8 No 3 (2026): International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM
Publisher : The Islamic Education and Multiculturalism Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijierm.v8i3.903

Abstract

ABSTRAK Artikel ini merekonstruksi pemikiran kritis dalam pendidikan tinggi Islam di Indonesia melalui sintesis integratif antara epistemologi Islam klasik dan pedagogi kontemporer. Alih-alih menggunakan pemetaan bibliometrik, penelitian ini menerapkan tinjauan literatur integratif yang mempertemukan tiga rumpun kajian, yaitu pemikiran kritis dalam pendidikan tinggi, epistemologi dan pendidikan Islam, serta pedagogi aktif-reflektif. Literatur dipilih secara purposif berdasarkan relevansi konseptualnya terhadap pendidikan tinggi Islam dan kontribusinya terhadap penalaran, dialog, refleksi, etika, dan pembelajaran aktif. Analisis dilakukan melalui identifikasi konsep, pembacaan komparatif, kategorisasi tematik, dan sintesis interpretatif. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa pemikiran kritis dalam pendidikan tinggi Islam tidak dapat direduksi secara memadai menjadi keterampilan kognitif yang bebas nilai. Pemikiran kritis lebih tepat dipahami sebagai praktik penalaran yang menghubungkan wahyu dan akal, teks dan konteks, verifikasi berbasis bukti, dialog argumentatif, refleksi diri, adab, dan tanggung jawab sosial. Sintesis ini menghasilkan suatu kerangka rekonstruktif yang mencakup lima dimensi: landasan epistemik, verifikasi analitis, interpretasi dialogis, regulasi diri reflektif, dan tanggung jawab etis-praksis. Berbagai pedagogi kontemporer—termasuk problem-based learning, case-based learning, penulisan reflektif, diskusi isu kontroversial, dan pembelajaran kolaboratif—dapat digunakan untuk mengoperasionalkan kelima dimensi tersebut. Dengan demikian, artikel ini menawarkan jembatan konseptual antara tradisi epistemologi Islam dan pendidikan tinggi abad ke-21 tanpa mengaburkan perbedaan historis di antara keduanya. ABSTRACT This article reconstructs critical thinking in Indonesian Islamic higher education through an integrative synthesis of classical Islamic epistemology and contemporary pedagogy. Rather than employing bibliometric mapping, the study uses an integrative literature review that brings together three bodies of scholarship: critical thinking in higher education, Islamic epistemology and education, and active-reflective pedagogies. Literature was purposively selected for its conceptual relevance to Islamic higher education and its contribution to reasoning, dialogue, reflection, ethics, and active learning. The analysis involved concept identification, comparative reading, thematic categorisation, and interpretive synthesis. The findings show that critical thinking in Islamic higher education cannot be adequately reduced to value-neutral cognitive skills. It is better understood as a practice of reasoning that connects revelation and reason, text and context, evidential verification, argumentative dialogue, self-reflection, adab, and social responsibility. The synthesis produces a reconstructive framework comprising five dimensions: epistemic grounding, analytical verification, dialogical interpretation, reflective self-regulation, and ethical-praxical responsibility. Contemporary pedagogies—including problem-based learning, case-based learning, reflective writing, controversial-issue discussion, and collaborative learning—can operationalise these dimensions. The article thus offers a conceptual bridge between Islamic epistemological traditions and twenty-first-century higher education without collapsing their historical differences.