Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Edunity: Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan INJURITY: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies
Made Subawa
Universitas Mahendradatta
Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Certainty Of Advocate Organizations Authorized To Carry Out The Appointment And Swearing-In Of Advocates I Putu Merta Suadi; Made Subawa; Siti Nurmawa Damanik
Edunity Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Vol. 3 No. 8 (2024): Edunity : Social and Educational Studies
Publisher : PT Publikasiku Academic Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57096/edunity.v3i8.293

Abstract

Highlighting significant issues within the Indonesian legal system, particularly concerning the profession of advocates. After the enactment of Law Number 18 of 2003 concerning Advocates (the Advocate Law), the Indonesian Advocates Association (PERADI) was initially mandated as the sole organization authorized to appoint and swear in advocates. This was intended to create legal certainty and establish uniform standards for the legal profession. This situation has been complicated by varying court rulings, with some decisions recognizing the authority of organizations other than PERADI to appoint and swear in advocates, while others adhere to the Advocate Law, which exclusively grants this authority to PERADI. The diversity of court rulings reveals sharp differences in legal interpretation, leading to doubts about legal validity. This research aims to examine and analyze the legal certainty regarding which advocate organizations are authorized to carry out the appointment and swearing-in of advocates. The research employs a normative juridical approach. The findings suggest that any actions taken by advocate organizations other than PERADI, which appear to utilize one of the eight powers granted to PERADI by the Advocate Law, including proposing the Advocate Oath to the High Court, constitute unlawful acts that harm PERADI as the sole entity entitled to such authority. These actions can be subject to legal accountability in both criminal and civil domains. This research is expected to provide comprehensive recommendations for improving the advocate legal system in Indonesia.
The Effectiveness of Electronic Trials in the Jurisdiction of the District Court Semarapura Class II Based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 7 of 2022 I Komang Merta Ardiasa; Made Subawa; Zuhro Nurindahwati
Interdiciplinary Journal and Hummanity (INJURITY) Vol. 3 No. 8 (2024): INJURITY: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies.
Publisher : Pusat Publikasi Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58631/injurity.v3i8.225

Abstract

Electronic trials, also known as e-trials, represent a significant innovation in the judicial process by integrating technology into court proceedings. These trials utilize digital platforms to manage and conduct various aspects of the trial process, including the submission of evidence, witness testimonies, and legal arguments. However, the adoption of electronic trials also presents challenges that must be carefully considered. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of electronic trial in the jurisdiction of the Semarapura District Court Class II based on Perma Number 7 of 2022, and the obstacles experienced in its implementation. The research contributes to a deeper understanding of the challenges that courts may face in adopting such systems, thereby offering critical information that could inform future improvements and policy adjustments.
Co-Authors I Komang Merta Ardiasa I Putu Merta Suadi Siti Nurmawa Damanik Zuhro Nurindahwati