de Fretes, Christian H. J.
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pemenuhan HAM Melalui Kebijakan Izin Tinggal Terpaksa Terhadap WNA Di Bali Pada 2020-2021 Hilda Dermaya Orifia; de Fretes, Christian H. J.; W. Nau, Novriest Umbu
Administraus Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): Administraus: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Manajemen
Publisher : STIA Bina Banua Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56662/administraus.v9i1.267

Abstract

This research analyzes efforts to fulfill human rights through the forced stay policy for foreign nationals in Bali during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020-2021. The pandemic caused a significant decline in Bali's tourism sector and impacted the mobility of foreigners who were forced to stay longer due to lockdowns. The Indonesian government issued Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 8 of 2020 as a form of legal protection that provides foreigners with certainty of residence permits in forced circumstances. This study uses a classical liberalism theory approach and descriptive qualitative research method to assess the government's role in ensuring the fulfillment of human rights, both for Indonesian citizens and foreigners. The findings show that this policy is not only a form of commitment to human rights, but also reflects the government's active response in maintaining legal stability in the midst of an emergency situation. However, the implementation of this policy faces administrative challenges and inter-agency coordination, which demands increased transparency and efficiency of services.
Efforts of the Government and the National Commission on Human Rights in Dealing with the Paniai Case: Problems of the Unfinished Grassroots Hutahaean, Juan Carlos Christfandy; de Fretes, Christian H. J.; Hadiwijoyo, Suryo Sakti
Politicos: Jurnal Politik Dan Pemerintahan 1-10
Publisher : Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/politicos.4.1.2024.1-10

Abstract

This article discusses the roles of the government and the National Commission on Human Rights (Komnas HAM) in handling severe human rights violation cases in Paniai, Papua. The purpose of this article is to determine whether the National Commission on Human Rights handled the severe human rights violations in Paniai optimally. The article employs a qualitative research method as a research procedure that generates descriptive data in the form of written or oral words from individuals or things observed. For gathering information, interviews were used along with different types of literature, like journals, to look at the steps that the National Commission on Human Rights took and news stories from different media outlets about how they dealt with serious human rights violations in Paniai. This article uses the theory of institutional and institutional roles to examine the roles played by the National Commission on Human Rights. The research findings indicate that handling the severe human rights violation cases in Paniai creates problematic situations between the government and civilians. First, the National Commission on Human Rights attempts to adapt to external and social expectations. Second, the formation of an order between the majority and minority in the uniformity pattern of witness elements during the investigation stage conducted by the Attorney General. Other challenges include the back-and-forth return of investigation files, which hinders the process of handling the Paniai case by the National Commission on Human Rights.