Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.713
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris Awang Long Law Review Unes Law Review Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review (GRLSPR) Journal Delik Adpertisi
Lira, M. Adnan
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris

 1 
THE POSITION AND PROTECTION OF CONCURRENT CREDITORS IN INDONESIA’S BANKRUPTCY PROCESS: A REVIEW BASED ON THE PRINCIPLE OF CREDITORIUM PARITY Lira, M. Adnan
The Juris Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v8i1.1280

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the position and protection of concurrent creditors in Indonesia, particularly in the context of Decision Number 113/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2019/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. Using normative research methods, this study examines primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials to address challenges faced by concurrent creditors in bankruptcy proceedings. The findings highlight the implementation issues of creditorium parity and provide recommendations for enhancing the legal framework. The research process involves inventory and identification of relevant legal materials, including primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. The stages of processing include the systematic collection and examination of these sources to analyze issues related to concurrent creditors in bankruptcy cases. Through an analysis of statutory provisions, court decisions, and practical bankruptcy procedures, this research reveals that while the principle of creditorium parity aims to ensure fair and balanced treatment among creditors, its implementation faces significant challenges. These challenges include differences in the positions of concurrent creditors, separatist creditors, and preferred creditors, as well as the complexities and bureaucratic nature of the bankruptcy process, which often hinder concurrent creditors from obtaining their rights.Court decisions, such as Decision Number 113/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2019/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst., demonstrate that the position of concurrent creditors is protected under Articles 1131 and 1132 of the Civil Code. This decision confirms that concurrent creditors have equal rights in creditor meetings, based on the amount of their claims.
THE POSITION AND PROTECTION OF CONCURRENT CREDITORS IN INDONESIA’S BANKRUPTCY PROCESS: A REVIEW BASED ON THE PRINCIPLE OF CREDITORIUM PARITY Lira, M. Adnan
The Juris Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v8i1.1280

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the position and protection of concurrent creditors in Indonesia, particularly in the context of Decision Number 113/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2019/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. Using normative research methods, this study examines primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials to address challenges faced by concurrent creditors in bankruptcy proceedings. The findings highlight the implementation issues of creditorium parity and provide recommendations for enhancing the legal framework. The research process involves inventory and identification of relevant legal materials, including primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. The stages of processing include the systematic collection and examination of these sources to analyze issues related to concurrent creditors in bankruptcy cases. Through an analysis of statutory provisions, court decisions, and practical bankruptcy procedures, this research reveals that while the principle of creditorium parity aims to ensure fair and balanced treatment among creditors, its implementation faces significant challenges. These challenges include differences in the positions of concurrent creditors, separatist creditors, and preferred creditors, as well as the complexities and bureaucratic nature of the bankruptcy process, which often hinder concurrent creditors from obtaining their rights.Court decisions, such as Decision Number 113/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2019/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst., demonstrate that the position of concurrent creditors is protected under Articles 1131 and 1132 of the Civil Code. This decision confirms that concurrent creditors have equal rights in creditor meetings, based on the amount of their claims.
Co-Authors Buana, Andika Prawira Wikra Wardhana Mamonto, Moch. Andry