Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unnes Law Journal PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Indonesian Journal of Environmental Law and Sustainable Development
Julianto, Riki
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Intersection between Administrative Law and Private Law on Environmental Law Litigation in Indonesia Legal System Julianto, Riki; Arifin, Ridwan
Indonesian Journal of Environmental Law and Sustainable Development Vol 2 No 1 (2023): January-June, 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijel.v2i1.65862

Abstract

This paper delves into the complex interplay between administrative and private law in environmental litigation within Indonesia's legal framework. Indonesia, rich in natural resources, faces pressing environmental challenges due to rapid industrialization and urbanization. Consequently, disputes often arise over environmental conservation, resource extraction, and pollution control, necessitating legal action to uphold environmental integrity. Administrative law governs governmental bodies responsible for environmental regulation, dictating procedures for permits, inspections, and sanctions. Conversely, private law regulates relationships between individuals and entities, encompassing tort liability, contractual obligations, and property rights. In environmental litigation, these legal domains intersect as plaintiffs seek remedies for harm caused by both public and private actors. The paper examines significant cases where administrative law intersects with private law doctrines, analyzing how administrative decisions may lead to civil claims under negligence, nuisance, or strict liability theories. It also explores the role of public interest litigation and citizen enforcement mechanisms in ensuring government accountability for environmental stewardship. Additionally, it evaluates the challenges and opportunities in navigating the convergence of administrative and private law, including issues of standing, jurisdiction, evidence, and remedies. Emphasizing judicial interpretation and legal harmonization, the paper underscores the symbiotic relationship between these legal realms in Indonesia's environmental litigation landscape. By shedding light on this intersection, it contributes to understanding environmental governance and access to justice while offering insights into global environmental law reconciling public and private interests.
Criminalization Arrangements for Corporations (Comparative Study of Indonesia and Australia) Baiquni, Muhammad Iqbal; Adiyatma, Septhian Eka; Saputri, Atha Difa; Julianto, Riki; Arifin, Ridwan; Fibrianti, Nurul
Unnes Law Journal Vol 9 No 2 (2023): Contemporary Issues on Law and Development: Social, Political and Legal Aspects
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v9i2.74129

Abstract

This research was conducted on corporate criminal liability arrangements in Indonesian legislation, with the long-term goal of harmonization of corporate criminal liability arrangements, so as to realize certainty, expediency and legal justice in law enforcement in Indonesia. To support the realization of harmonization in corporate criminal liability arrangements in the legislation, it is necessary to review corporate criminal liability arrangements in other countries, both those with the same legal system as Indonesia and with countries with a common law system, namely Australia. The research method used to achieve the research goals and targets is normative legal research with a statutory, and comparative approach method. The projected results of this study are in the form of real data on the implementation of corporate penal regulations for the National Legal System. The output of this research is in the form of published articles in accredited national journals
Kajian Hukum Atas Pembantuan dalam Melakukan Penganiyaan dengan Rencana yang Mengakibatkan Kematian (Studi Putusan No. 212/Pid.B/2017/PN Gpr) Julianto, Riki; Arifin, Ridwan
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/pampas.v5i1.23681

Abstract

This article study the case of the District Court decision in the city of Kediri number 212/Pid.B/2017/PN Gpr in the same case as decision number 213/Pid.B/2017/PN Gpr, in which in both decisions there are many criminal elements that could be discussed such as complicity, forms of complicity within complicity, failure of assistance, reasons for reduce the sentences, and separation in filing criminal cases. the first decision was about assisting the crime and the second was about participating in the murder. Even though the two case files were split (splitsing), the material or subject matter was the same, predominantly  about murder which was caused by rape to the defendant in prior. Both decisions are criminal acts of deelneming (complicity), complicity is a form of crime committed by more than one person who is involved psychologically or physically, so that the criminal responsibility of each person is different. The purpose of writing this article is to analyze a. whether and the criminal categorization of the perpetrator's actions in decision number 212/pid.B/2017/PN Gpr is coherent according to the teachings of criminal law regarding complicity (deelneming) b. whether assistance in the case of PN decision number 212/pid.B/2017/PN Gpr is failed-assistance of committing crime c. whether the court's decision in sentencing already adhere principle of reducing sentence. this research is using the normative-empirical legal research method with the approach of studying the judge's decision in the case of a criminal act that occurred. Abstrak Artikel ini merupakan kajian atas studi kasus putusan Pengadilan Negeri di kota Kediri no. 212/Pid.B/2017/PN Gpr dalam perkara yang sama dengan putusan no. 213/Pid.B/2017/PN Gpr, yang mana dalam kedua putusan tersebut banyak unsur pidana yang dapat dibahas seperti penyertaan, bentuk penyertaan dalam penyertaan, gagalnya penyertaan, alasan peringanan pidana, dan splitsing dalam pemberkasan kasus pidana. putusan pertama adalah tentang pembantuan tindak pidana dan yang kedua adalah tentang ikut serta dalam pembunuhan. Meski kedua berkas perkara dipisahkan (splitsing) tapi materi atau pokok perkaranya sama tentang sebuah tindak pidana pembunuhan yang disebabkan terlebih dahulu oleh pemerkosaan terhadap terdakwa pembantuan. Kedua putusan tersebut merupakan perkara tindak pidana deelneming (penyertaan), dimana tindak pidana dilakukan oleh lebih dari satu orang yang terlibat secara psikis atapun fisik sehingga tanggung jawab pidana masing-masing berbeda. Tujuan ditulisnya artikel ini adalah untuk menganalisis a. apakah pengkategorian pidana terhadap perbuatan pelaku dalam putusan no. 212/pid.B/2017/PN Gpr sudah tepat sesuai dengan ajaran hukum pidana tentang penyertaan (deelneming)  b. apakah pembantuan dalam perkara putusan PN no. 212/pid.B/2017/PN Gpr merupakan pembantuan gagal terhadap tindak pidana c. apakah keputusan pengadilan sudah tepat dengan memperhatikan hal yang meringankan pidana. kasus Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif-empiris dengan pendekatan kajian putusan hakim dalam kasus tindak pidana yang terjadi.
Co-Authors Adiyatma, Septhian Eka Baiquni, Muhammad Iqbal Nurul Fibrianti Ridwan Arifin Saputri, Atha Difa