Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.116
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Veritas et Justitia AIWADTHU: Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Action Research Literate (ARL) Amicus Curiae
Iriawan, Asep Iwan
Unknown Affiliation
Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
KELEMBAGAAN DAN KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN NIAGA TENTANG UPAYA HUKUM KEBERATAN TERHADAP PUTUSAN KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA Iriawan, Asep Iwan
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v10i1.7856

Abstract

Article 24A (5) of the 1945 Constitution regulates the composition, position, membership, and procedural law of the Supreme Court and subordinate judicial bodies. Initially limited to bankruptcy, postponement of debt payment obligations (PKPU), and commercial matters by Law Number 37 of 2004, the jurisdiction of the Commercial Court has expanded through other laws. This expansion raises two key issues: (1) The need for legal remedies for objections to decisions of the Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU), and (2) The competence of the Commercial Court to address these objections. This research uses a normative juridical method, suggesting that legal remedies for objections to KPPU decisions should be regulated in a separate law, addressing decisions from institutions beyond the judiciary’s jurisdiction. The procedural aspects for contesting KPPU decisions, outlined in Article 45 of the Omnibus Law Number 6 of 2023, should first be determined within the competence of the Commercial Court as regulated by law. The current institutional arrangements and authority of the Commercial Court, as outlined in the Bankruptcy and PKPU Laws and laws on Intellectual Property Rights, should be revised through a dedicated Law on Commercial Courts. This law should define the court's structure, powers, procedural rules, and set time limits and sanctions for case resolution at both the Commercial Court and the Supreme Court.
KAJIAN KOMPARASI MEDIASI PERCERAIAN PENGADILAN AGAMA INDONESIA DAN MAHKAMAH SYARIAH MALAYSIA: Comparatife Study of Divorce Mediation in Indonesian Religios Court and Malaysia Sharia Court Cahya, Indra; Iriawan, Asep Iwan
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i2.19780

Abstract

The Religious Courts, one of whose powers is to resolve divorce issues for Muslim people. Before the divorce trial begins, the parties must mediate in court assisted by a mediator. Whereas in Malaysia the Religious Courts are called the Sharia Courts whose duties are to resolve issues related to Islamic matters, if a husband and wife have an agreement to file for divorce, the Sharia Court shall resolve the matter by conducting mediation or sulh first. Sulh is an attempt to reconcile couples in the context of marriage as an attempt to reconcile between husband and wife before the couple is legally divorced and separated. The problem is how are the similarities in divorce mediation between the Indonesian Religious Court and the Malaysian Sharia Court and how are the differences in divorce mediation between the Indonesian Religious Court and the Malaysian Sharia Court. This study uses a descriptive comparative normative research type using secondary data obtained from the literature. Secondary data was analyzed qualitatively by using deductive logic. Based on the results of a comparative study of divorce mediation at the Indonesian Religious Court and at the Malaysian Sharia Court, they have similarities and differences. The similarities are regarding the time of the mediation process and the appointment of mediators, while the differences are regarding the method of conducting the mediation, the requirements of the mediator, the mediation arrangements, the time limit for the mediation process, and the number of mediators.
Kepastian Hukum Kompetensi Pengadilan Niaga dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Iriawan, Asep Iwan
Action Research Literate Vol. 7 No. 10 (2023): Action Research Literate
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Melalui Pengadilan Niaga Dihubungkan Dengan Asas Kepastian Hukum Sebagai Upaya Pengembangan Sistem Peradilan. Permasalahan yang diangkat (1) Bagaimana kewenangan Pengadilan Niaga dalam penyelesaian sengketa bisnis mengingat tidak adanya kejelasan tentang objek perkara perniagaan yang dapat ditangani oleh Pengadilan Niaga, (2) Bagaimana kepastian hukum penyelesaian sengketa bisnis di Pengadilan Niaga yang sering berlarut-larut melalui proses peninjauan kembali yang tidak sesuai dengan asas peradilan sederhana, cepat dan biaya ringan. Kewenangan Pengadilan Niaga menurut Undang-Undang Kepailitan adalah memeriksa, memutus perkara kepailitan dan perkara perniagaan lainnya. Undang-Undang Kepailitan tidak menjabarkan yang dimaksud dengan perkara perniagaan lainnya dalam pelaksanaanya dapat menimbulkan multi interpretasi. Upaya hukum peninjauan kembali di Pengadilan Niaga untuk perkara kepailitan diatur secara limitatif sedangkan dalam perkara hak milik intelektual peninjauan kembali tidak diatur
Proses Pemeriksaan Saksi di Persidangan Pidana yang Efektif Efisien Berdasarkan Asas Legalitas Iriawan, Asep Iwan
Action Research Literate Vol. 7 No. 11 (2023): Action Research Literate
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/arl.v7i11.205

Abstract

Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Pasal 24 A ayat (5) menyebutkan susunan, kedudukan, keanggotaan dan hukum acara Mahkamah Agung serta badan peradilan dibawahnya diatur dengan undang-undang. Proses pemeriksaan persidangan perkara pidana diatur dalam KUHAP Pasal 3 yang menyatakan proses peradilan menggunakan Undang-undang termasuk pemeriksaan saksi harus bebas, jujur dan obyektif. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini 1) Bagaimana regulasi asas legalitas dalam proses pemeriksaan persidangan saksi di peradilan pidana. 2) Bagaimana implementasi proses pemeriksaan saksi di persidangan. Regulasi asas legalitas dalam proses pemeriksaan persidangan saksi di peradilan pidana. Dalam menilai kebenaran keterangan seorang saksi, hakim harus dengan sungguhsungguh memperhatikan persesuaian antara keterangan saksi satu dengan yang lain, persesuaian antara keterangan saksi dengan alat bukti lain, alasan yang mungkin dipergunakan oleh saksi untuk memberi keterangan yang tertentu, cara hidup dan kesusilaán saksi serta segala sesuatu yang pada umumnya dapat mempengaruhi dapat tidaknya keterangan itu dipercaya. Implementasi proses pemeriksaan saksi di persidangan banyak tidak sesuai seperti Keterangan saksi “berbeda” dengan keterangannya dalam BAP yang dilakukan oleh penyidik, Saksi menarik/mencabut keterangannya dalam BAP yang dibuat Penyidik, Keterangan Saksi di depan persidangan diduga diberikan de¬ngan tldak sebenarnya. Dalam pemeriksaan dipersidangan tidak sesuai dengan asas legalitas sebagaimana dimaksud KUHAP tetapi mengikuti praktek persidangan yang dianggap biasa
KELEMBAGAAN DAN KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN NIAGA TENTANG UPAYA HUKUM KEBERATAN TERHADAP PUTUSAN KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA Iriawan, Asep Iwan
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v10i1.7856

Abstract

Article 24A (5) of the 1945 Constitution regulates the composition, position, membership, and procedural law of the Supreme Court and subordinate judicial bodies. Initially limited to bankruptcy, postponement of debt payment obligations (PKPU), and commercial matters by Law Number 37 of 2004, the jurisdiction of the Commercial Court has expanded through other laws. This expansion raises two key issues: (1) The need for legal remedies for objections to decisions of the Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU), and (2) The competence of the Commercial Court to address these objections. This research uses a normative juridical method, suggesting that legal remedies for objections to KPPU decisions should be regulated in a separate law, addressing decisions from institutions beyond the judiciary’s jurisdiction. The procedural aspects for contesting KPPU decisions, outlined in Article 45 of the Omnibus Law Number 6 of 2023, should first be determined within the competence of the Commercial Court as regulated by law. The current institutional arrangements and authority of the Commercial Court, as outlined in the Bankruptcy and PKPU Laws and laws on Intellectual Property Rights, should be revised through a dedicated Law on Commercial Courts. This law should define the court's structure, powers, procedural rules, and set time limits and sanctions for case resolution at both the Commercial Court and the Supreme Court.
Legal Counseling on Fast Procedural Law for Business and Investment in the Public Dialogue on the Draft Civil Procedure Law Iriawan, Asep Iwan; Nurbaiti, Siti; Permanasari, Arlina; Jamal, Carissa Belia Putri
AIWADTHU: Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Volume 5 Issue 3, November 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law Pattimura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/aiwadthu.v5i3.3442

Abstract

Introduction: National economic growth requires a responsive and efficient legal system, particularly in the field of business and investment. The Draft Bill on Civil Procedure Law is expected to provide legal certainty and accelerate the resolution of business and investment disputes.Purposes of The Devotion: This article aims to provide understanding of fast-track civil procedure for business and investment through public dialogue.Method of The Devotion: The method applied was lecture and interactive discussion, using an empirical approach based on stakeholder participation in public dialogue.Results Main Findings of the Devotion: The community service activity revealed that participants gained broader knowledge of business dispute resolution through both litigation and non-litigation, fast-track proceedings in civil procedure law, and academic aspects of the Draft Bill. The enthusiasm of the participants highlighted the urgent demand for a faster and more efficient civil procedure system. These findings emphasize the importance of reforming civil procedural law to foster a favorable investment climate and ensure legal protection for business actors.
Co-Authors Indra Cahya Jamal, Carissa Belia Putri Permanasari, Arlina Siti Nurbaiti