Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Sosial Humaniora
Henky Chandra
Unknown Affiliation
Education Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
AGRESI ISRAEL TERHADAP PALESTINA PERSPEKTIF HUKUM HUMANITER INTERNASIONAL Henky Chandra
Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 3: Januari 2024
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Israel's aggression against Palestine sparked an international reaction because of the large number of casualties it caused. action, most of them were civilians. According to humanitarian law, Israel's invasion of Palestine violates the principles of humanitarian law, namely: the humanitarian principle, the restrictive principle, and the principle of distinction. Israel committed war crimes, so the international community is wondering how Israel could commit war crimes while being tried? There are three mechanisms for enforcing humanitarian law. Firstly, the parties to the contract States signatory to the Geneva Conventions must adopt all necessary legislation to provide effective criminal sanctions for persons who commit or order the commission of any of the grave violations, secondly by special courts and thirdly by the International Criminal Court, however Prosecuting Israel is quite difficult because Israel has not ratified the 1998 Rome Statute
DISPARITAS PUTUSAN HAKIM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DI WILAYAH HUKUM PENGADILAN NEGERI RANTAUPRAPAT Haerul Mustofa; Henky Chandra
Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 3: Januari 2024
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Different decisions result in arguments about the same customer against two different defendants with different charges. This study is basically descriptive normative law. The research results show that: Both assessments cited as case studies are based on inequality theory. The actual decision is heard in court and handled in a certain way By law. However, these results are not in accordance with the sense of justice that emerged in 2000. general; It would be better for the judge who hears this case to look at the actual legal facts in more depth to find the real truth of a problem. I have tried. The factors causing disparities in judges' decisions regarding drug offense cases covered in this research are: a) There are legal reasons for several interpretations of Articles 112 and 127 of the Narcotics Law. b) law enforcement factors; The judge has the discretion to exercise the power of discovery. Truth is not actually used by the judge in making decisions. c) legal and cultural factors; There is a culture of bribery and conciliation, processing requests and decisions of light punishment. Stakeholders must work together to decriminalize diversion by drug users regarding administrative procedures and medical services
Co-Authors Haerul Mustofa