<![CDATA[Different decisions result in arguments about the same customer against two different defendants with different charges. This study is basically descriptive normative law. The research results show that: Both assessments cited as case studies are based on inequality theory. The actual decision is heard in court and handled in a certain way By law. However, these results are not in accordance with the sense of justice that emerged in 2000. general; It would be better for the judge who hears this case to look at the actual legal facts in more depth to find the real truth of a problem. I have tried. The factors causing disparities in judges' decisions regarding drug offense cases covered in this research are: a) There are legal reasons for several interpretations of Articles 112 and 127 of the Narcotics Law. b) law enforcement factors; The judge has the discretion to exercise the power of discovery. Truth is not actually used by the judge in making decisions. c) legal and cultural factors; There is a culture of bribery and conciliation, processing requests and decisions of light punishment. Stakeholders must work together to decriminalize diversion by drug users regarding administrative procedures and medical services]]>
Copyrights © 2024
