Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.362
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Golden Ratio of Marketing and Applied Psychology of Business Golden Ratio of Human Resource Management Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education Golden Ratio of Data in Summary Indonesian Journal of Classroom Action Research (IJCAR) Journal of Management and Informatics Indonesian Journal of Health Research and Development Advances in Human Resource Management Research Advances in Business & Industrial Marketing Research Advances in Healthcare Research Advances in Community Services Research Journal of Indonesian Health Policy and Administration Vokasi UNESA Bulletin of Engineering, Technology and Applied Science IJITL
Willie, Michael Mncedisi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 25 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : IJITL

 1 
Conducting High-Quality Literature Reviews in Academic Research Willie, Michael Mncedisi
Indonesian Journal of Innovative Teaching and Learning Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Indonesian Journal of Innovative Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 2026
Publisher : Academia Edu Cendekia Indonesia (AEDUCIA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64420/ijitl.v3i1.426

Abstract

Background: Literature reviews are essential in academic research because they establish theoretical foundations and identify research gaps. However, inconsistencies in methodological rigour and reporting practices often weaken their credibility and impact, underscoring the need for clearer standards to guide the conduct of high-quality reviews. Objectives: This study aimed to identify, analyse, and synthesise key methodological, theoretical, and practical principles that underpin rigorous and credible literature reviews in academic research. Methods: The study employed a qualitative integrative review design. Data were collected through a systematic examination of international methodological guidelines, peer-reviewed empirical studies, and relevant grey literature. The selected sources were analysed using thematic synthesis techniques to identify recurring standards, frameworks, and best practices in literature review methodology. Results: The findings indicated that high-quality literature reviews are characterized by clear alignment between review objectives and design, theoretically grounded analysis, researcher reflexivity, transparent search and selection procedures, and systematic coding and synthesis processes. The study also highlighted the importance of peer review mechanisms, adherence to ethical research standards, and the inclusion of diverse and credible sources in strengthening validity, reliability, and scholarly impact. Conclusion: Conducting a rigorous literature review requires structured methodological frameworks, procedural transparency, and ongoing critical reflection throughout the research process. A systematic and reflective approach enhances coherence, credibility, and academic contribution. Contribution: This study consolidates dispersed methodological insights into a practical and structured framework that offers actionable guidance for postgraduate students, early-career researchers, and experienced scholars seeking to produce coherent, trustworthy, and impactful literature reviews.
Co-Authors Athandile Hadebe