Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

Citation Cartels: Understanding Their Emergence and Impact on the Academic World Willie, Michael Mncedisi
Golden Ratio of Data in Summary Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): May - October
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grdis.v4i2.581

Abstract

Citation metrics have become pivotal in evaluating academic research and influencing funding, promotions, and institutional prestige. However, the increasing emphasis on these metrics has given rise to unethical practices, notably citation cartels, which artificially inflate citation counts through collusive agreements among researchers or journals. This study investigates the prevalence and impact of citation cartels by analysing citation patterns in recent papers. Using a systematic approach, we examined citation data across five papers to identify patterns of collusion and the extent of citation inflation. The results reveal that Author 1 was cited in every reference across four out of five papers, either as a sole author or co-author, with a direct or indirect responsibility for 100% of the citations. Similarly, Authors 2 and 3 demonstrated substantial influence, with median citation shares of 36% and 35%, respectively. These findings highlight the significant role of key authors in shaping citation distributions and raise concerns about the integrity of citation metrics. The study concludes with recommendations for addressing citation cartels, including implementing detection systems, enhanced peer review processes, and a more balanced approach to evaluating research impact.
Population and Target Population in Research Methodology Willie, Michael Mncedisi
Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): December - May
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grsse.v4i1.405

Abstract

This paper thoroughly explores the foundational principles governing population and target population concepts within research methodology. It delves into the essential roles these concepts play in shaping the design and influencing the interpretation of research studies. Through an exhaustive analysis, it meticulously outlines the nuances that differentiate these two concepts, elucidating their respective contributions and implications across diverse research paradigms. Moreover, this paper underscores the importance of establishing clear definitions and boundaries for both the population and the target population. It emphasises how such precision is indispensable in guiding the formulation of effective sampling strategies, which are pivotal for ensuring the accuracy and reliability of study outcomes. Furthermore, it sheds light on how the clarity in defining these concepts significantly impacts the generalizability of research findings, elucidating how findings derived from a well-defined target population can be more confidently extrapolated to broader populations. In addition to methodological considerations, this paper investigates the ethical dimensions inherent in delineating population and target population. It underscores the moral imperative of accurately representing the groups under study, particularly ensuring equitable access to research participation and safeguarding against potential biases.
The Case for Compulsory DNA Testing at Birth to Confirm Paternity: Ethical, Legal, and Social Considerations Willie, Michael Mncedisi
Journal of Indonesian Health Policy and Administration Vol. 10, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Compulsory paternity testing at birth has sparked significant legal, ethical, and social debate due to its potential impact on family dynamics, child well-being, and parental responsibility. This review explores the ethical, legal, and societal implications of such testing, using Bioecological Systems Theory and Rawls' Theory of Justice to frame the discussion. This review evaluates the benefits and challenges of mandatory DNA testing at birth, particularly in reducing paternity fraud, ensuring fairness in child support allocation, and enhancing socio-economic outcomes, especially in low-income households. This qualitative review draws on multidisciplinary literature from family law, genetic counseling, social policy, and fathers' rights advocacy. Sources were identified through PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, alongside grey literature such as policy briefs and advocacy reports (e.g., Fathers 4 Justice SA). Search terms included "paternity fraud," "mandatory DNA testing," "child support," and related ethical and legal concepts. The literature reveals paternity fraud is a significant concern, which compulsory DNA testing could help mitigate; however, privacy, parental autonomy, and the social implications of mandatory testing present challenges. The review emphasizes the importance of balancing the benefits of transparency with protecting individual rights, particularly in societies with strong traditional family structures. Compulsory paternity testing could promote fairness and reduce financial exploitation, but its implementation must address ethical concerns, including informed consent and privacy. Policymakers are urged to develop balanced regulatory frameworks that consider both the benefits and the ethical challenges. Special attention should be given to cultural values and protecting children's rights.
A Scoping Review of Epilepsy Care in Low-Resource Settings: Addressing Stigma, Healthcare Disparities, and Socioeconomic Barriers Willie, Michael Mncedisi
Journal of Indonesian Health Policy and Administration Vol. 10, No. 3
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Epilepsy affects around fifty million people worldwide, with stigma and limited healthcare access posing significant challenges, especially in low-resource settings. This scoping review aimed to identify key barriers to epilepsy care, focusing on stigma, healthcare access, and socioeconomic factors in sub-Saharan Africa and similar contexts. Using the Arksey and O’Malley framework, a systematic search was conducted across online databases for peer-reviewed studies published. The review found that stigma significantly delayed diagnosis, increased social isolation, and reduced treatment adherence. Healthcare barriers included a lack of trained professionals and inadequate treatment protocols. Socioeconomic challenges, such as poverty and rural residency, were linked to lower healthcare utilisation and medication non-adherence. Additionally, limited public awareness reinforced misinformation and discrimination. The findings highlight the urgent need for targeted health interventions, public education, and stronger integration of epilepsy care into primary healthcare, particularly in underserved regions.