Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Publisitas Politik Aceng Aziz Muslim Menuju Pemilihan Umum 2024 di Facebook Muldani, Trisno; Swarnawati, Aminah; Muksin, Nani Nurani; Harmonis, Harmonis
JURNAL LENSA MUTIARA KOMUNIKASI Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Lensa Mutiara Komunikasi
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS SARI MUTIARA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51544/jlmk.v7i2.4287

Abstract

General elections (elections) are one of the routine agendas that characterize a democratic country like Indonesia. Ahead of the 2024 elections, political actors and their parties are competing to introduce themselves in advance, including through political publicity activities. Likewise, Aceng Aziz Muslim plans to run for the Tasikmalaya Regency Legislative Council in Election District 7 (Dapil 7) and the media chosen for these activities is Facebook. This study aims to determine the political publicity of Aceng Aziz Muslim on Facebook, as well as what are the supporting and inhibiting factors. The research results show that Aceng Aziz Muslim's political publicity in Indonesia has reached a significant level of attention throughout his career. He managed to build a strong social network in cyberspace, allowing him to gain wide access to various audiences on Facebook. His ability to identify issues relevant to the community and create creative content has also sustained public interest and support over the long term. The use of social media platform analytics tools has also been beneficial in measuring the impact of his publications. However, Aceng Aziz Muslim also faced a number of challenges in his efforts to build his political publicity on Facebook.
Implikasi Awal Penerbitan SKB UU ITE Pasal 27 Ayat (3) Muldani, Trisno
MUKASI: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): Mei 2022
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Penelitian Pengabdian Algero

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (252.219 KB) | DOI: 10.54259/mukasi.v1i2.857

Abstract

The Electronic Information and Transaction Law (UU ITE) and the latest revisions that have been carried out by the government together with the DPR continue to present polemics in the community. In anticipation of the polemics that continue to occur, on June 23, 2021 the government issued a Joint Decree on the Guidelines for the Implementation Criteria for the Electronic Information and Transaction Law (SKB uu ITE). This SKB was signed by the Minister of Communication and Informatics, the Attorney General and the Head of the Police of the Republic of Indonesia, which is expected to be a law enforcement guideline so that there is no multi-interpretation of the implementation of the ITE Law which previously became a rubber article. This article aims to analyze the initial implications of the Issuance of SKB UU ITE article 27 paragraph (3) on defamation. This study uses a qualitative approach with discourse studies. From the study, three conclusions were found: 1) The Existence of Pros and Cons of Issuing Guidelines for the Implementation of Article 27 paragraph (3) Points (L), 2) The Existence of Pros and Cons Related to the Inclusion of Journalist Profession 3) The Government and DPR still need to immediately revise the ITE Law.
Communication in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Power, Meaning, and Control Muldani, Trisno; Priantana, Ajeng Puspita; Sulistiawati, Windi
Journal of Dialogos Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Dialogos - February
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/abwezv27

Abstract

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into communication systems has fundamentally transformed how messages are produced, distributed, and interpreted. AI-mediated communication no longer operates as a neutral technological intermediary but functions as a structural force that reshapes power relations, meaning-making processes, and mechanisms of control. This study aims to critically examine communication in the age of artificial intelligence by focusing on the interrelated dimensions of power, meaning, and control. Employing a qualitative approach with a critical–conceptual research design, the study analyzes theoretical literature from communication studies, critical media theory, and AI studies, alongside policy and ethical documents related to algorithmic governance. The findings indicate that AI algorithms operate as infrastructural actors that regulate visibility, legitimize certain discourses, and marginalize others through automated curation, recommendation, and moderation systems. Furthermore, the production of meaning becomes increasingly aligned with algorithmic logics of optimization and performance metrics, leading to potential homogenization and instrumentalization of communication. At the same time, AI-enabled surveillance and behavioral normalization introduce subtle forms of discipline that shape communicative practices. Although spaces of resistance and negotiation persist, they remain asymmetrical and structurally constrained. This study concludes that communication in the AI era must be understood as a contested arena of power rather than a purely technical domain, highlighting the urgent need for critical frameworks and democratic governance to preserve communicative autonomy and pluralism.