Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

‘Good Faith’ in Land Transaction: A Comparative Analysis of the USA and Netherlands Law Karjoko, Lego; Iswantoro; Ramazanova, Makhabbat
Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues (JSDERI) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/jsderi.v2i3.49

Abstract

The lack of uniformity among judges in interpreting the criteria for buyers' good faith in land sale and purchase cases results in less favorable outcomes for buyers. This study aims to compare the regulations and implementations of the principle of good faith in land transactions in the United States, the Netherlands and Indonesia. Utilizing a statutory and conceptual approach, supplemented by comparative analysis, this research examines the relevant laws and concepts, including contractual rules and regulations governing sales and purchases. The findings indicate that the legal system significantly influences how countries regulate the principle of good faith—either concretely or abstractly. This influence is closely tied to the concepts of written legal sources, jurisprudence, and the practical application of the principle in statutory regulations. Generally, Indonesia, like other countries, faces challenges in implementing the principle of good faith, particularly for buyers, due to the lack of a definitive benchmark to assess whether agreements are executed in good faith and fairness. To address this issue, the regulation of good faith and its criteria should be clearly articulated in written laws. Ensuring that the principle of good faith is applied throughout the entire land buying and selling process—from pre-contractual stages to contract execution—is crucial for providing adequate protection for buyers acting in good faith.
Hubungan Penanganan Komplain Terhadap Kepuasan Pasien Di Rumah Sakit Banjarmasin Santi; Ariadi, Herman; Iswantoro
JIKES : Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Juli-Desember 2024
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Tanggui Baimbaian Kalimantan Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71456/jik.v3i1.892

Abstract

Salah satu lembaga yang ikut andil dalam bidang pelayanan jasa kesehatan dan bertanggung jawab memberikan pengobatan, perawatan, mencari kesembuhan kesehatan pasien, dan mengupayakan pendidikan hidup sehat bagi daerah setempat. Penilaian konsumen terhadap kualitas pelayanan Rumah Sakit sangat penting sebagai salah satu cara pandang dalam mengembangkan pelayanan lebih lanjut untuk mewujudkan loyalitas kualitas pelayanan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan Penanganan Komplain terhadap Kepuasan pasien di Rumah Sakit Banjarmasin. Penelitian ini Menggunakan Metode desain penelitian kuantitatif yaitu dengan studi korelasional. Jenis penelitian ini menggunakan analitik korelasional dengan pendekatan cross sectional. Hasil uji statistik dengan menggunakan Spearman Rank menunjukkan nilai signifikansi sebesar 0,000 yang lebih kecil dari 0,05 sebagai taraf yang sudah ditentukan (p value < α), sehingga dapat dinyatakan Ha diterima dan Ho ditolak yang secara uji statistik terdapat hubungan penanganan komplain terhadap kepuasan pasien di Rumah Sakit Banjarmasin. Hubungan kedua variabel ini menunjukkan ke arah korelasi positif dengan nilai Spearman Rank yaitu 0,907 yang menunjukkan bahwa hubungan kedua variabel memiliki hubungan yang sangat kuat. Sehingga, pentingnya penanganan komplain dari rumah sakit terhadap pasien untuk meningkatkan kepuasan pasien yang mana akan berdampak pada kualitas rumah sakit.
From Regulation to Transparency: Policy Implementation of Public Information Disclosure in Indonesian State Religious Universities within the SDG 16 Framework Iswantoro; Tobroni, Faiq; Aktar, Md Nadim
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/5ag4wd56

Abstract

Public information disclosure is a cornerstone of transparent, accountable, and participatory governance in higher education. This study examines the implementation of public information disclosure (PID) in State Religious Higher Education Institutions (PTKN) under Law No. 14/2008 and its derivative regulations. It aims to identify the gap between regulatory frameworks and institutional practices and to propose strategies for optimizing disclosure. The analysis employs Mazmanian’s policy implementation theory, focusing on three dimensions: problem characteristics, policy characteristics, and external environment. Data were drawn from the 2024 Monitoring and Evaluation (Monev) conducted by the Central Information Commission, complemented by a review of regulatory instruments and institutional practices in PTKN. The results indicate that most PTKN are still categorized as “less informative” or “non-informative.” Implementation barriers include limited administrative capacity, inadequate digital infrastructure, weak monitoring systems, and entrenched bureaucratic cultures. These factors collectively prevent PTKN from fully realizing the objectives of the Public Information Disclosure Law.The study proposes strategies to overcome these barriers, including enhancing the competence of Information and Documentation Management Officers (PPID), developing integrated digital platforms, strengthening leadership commitment, and institutionalizing rigorous monitoring and evaluation mechanisms. Collaboration with external stakeholders and improved public literacy on the right to information are also essential. Optimizing PID is not only a matter of legal compliance but also a governance tool and a moral responsibility aligned with religious values. Successful implementation will enhance public trust, institutional accountability, and the global relevance of Indonesia’s religious higher education sector while contributing to Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 16.