Erviyanti Rosmaida
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Sikap Anti Korupsi Bagi Calon Legislatif Dalam Rangka Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia Sebagai Wujud Bela Negara Ratu Wida Widyaningsih Suhandi; Erviyanti Rosmaida; Christloy Totota Karo Karo; Irwan Triadi
Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): Oktober : Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/doktrin.v1i4.1361

Abstract

The anti-corruption attitude of legislative candidates in the context of overcoming corruption in Indonesia is an interesting thing to observe and study, Indonesia has stipulated MPR RI Decree Number XI / MPR / 1998 concerning the administration of a State that is Clean and Free of Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism, it turns out that the provisions that have been determined do not become a reference for legislative members so that corruption cases are still rampant within the legislative body. Normative legal research or library research, with a statute approach, conceptual approach, comparative approach, historical approach. The nature of the research used in this research is descriptive-prescriptive, the author uses content analysis. The results of this study are anti-corruption attitudes for legislative candidates with the MPR decree, the Election Law should pay more attention to former corruption convicts who can run as legislative candidates, apart from contradicting the MPR decree, the decision in the Election Law can eliminate public trust in state administrators.
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Ultimate Beneficiary Owner (UBN) yang Melakukan Gratifikasi Terhadap Pejabat: Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2205K/Pid.Sus/2022 Isti Puspitasari; Erviyanti Rosmaida; Taufiqurrohman Syahruri
Jurnal Relasi Publik Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Februari : Jurnal Relasi Publik
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/jrp-widyakarya.v2i1.2018

Abstract

Decision Number 2205 K/Pd/Sus/2022 The Supreme Court again upheld the acquittal decision of Samin Tan as the owner of PT Beneficial Ownershiprneo Lumbung Energi & Metal (PT BLEM). The panel is of the opinion that the giver of gratification cannot be punished because the Corruption Eradication Law is not designed to punish the giver of gratification even though Samin Tan's position as the giver of gratification is the ultimate beneficiary owner of PT BLEM. The research method used in this research is using normative juridical research methods and using literature study techniques to answer the problems in this research. The result of the discussion of the first problem formulation is that Samin Tan cannot be held criminally responsible because the person giving the gratification is not criminalized under the law even though Samin Tan is the ultimate beneficiary owner who has the potential to commit this act because it is in the interests of his company. The result of the discussion on the formulation of the second problem is that the judge's considerations in the decision did not prioritize a sense of justice and expediency because they only prioritized legal certainty which resulted in Samin Tan being able to escape the demands of the public prosecutor.