Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

The Judge's Consideration of the Defendant's Statement in Imposing a Sentence Against the Security Guard While on Duty Madjid, Neni Vesna; Akbar, Rachmat
Ekasakti Journal of Law and Justice Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): June
Publisher : Master of Law Program, Ekasakti University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60034/ejlj.v1i1.2

In Article 184 Paragraph (1) of Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHAP) it is stated that a defendant’s testimony in a trial is not sufficient to prove that the defendant has been guilty of committing a criminal offense without being supported by other evidence. There are various forms of consideration of the judge against the defendant’s testimony in criminal sentencing by the security guard on duty in the Decision Number: 372/Pid.B/2022/PN.Pdg and Decisions Number: 373/Pid.B/2022/PN.Pdg. The issues being studied are First, How is the judge’s consideration of the defendant’s testimony in criminal sentencing by a security guard on duty. (On the Decisions Number: 372/Pid.B/2020/PN.Pdg and Number: 373/Pid.B/2020/PN.Pdg)? Second, How is the judge’s decisions based on the consideration of the defendant’s testimony in criminal sentencing by a security guard on duty. (On the Decisions Number: 372/Pid.B/2020/PN.Pdg and Number: 373/Pid.B/ 2020/PN.Pdg)? This study is analytical descriptive research. The approach used in this study was normative juridical approach. The data used in this study were secondary data. All data and materials obtained from the results of the study were prepared and analyzed qualitatively, and presented in a descriptive qualitative form. Based on the results of discussion and analysis it can be concluded that. First, That the judge’s Consideration of the Defendant’s Testimony in Criminal sentencing by the Security Guard on Duty on the Decisions Number: 372/Pid.B/2020/PN.Pdg and Number: 373/Pid.B/2020/PN.Pdg has covered both juridical and non-juridical considerations. Second, That the decision of the judge Based on Consideration of The Defendant’s Testimony in criminal sentencing by the Security Guard on Duty on The Decisions Number: 372/Pid.B/2020/PN.Pdg and Number: 373/Pid.B/2020/PN.Pdg is based on the defendant’s evidence and aligned with other evidence such as witness testimony and letters.

PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM TERHADAP KETERANGAN TERDAKWA DALAM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN PEMIDANAAN Wibowo, Adhi; Akbar, Rachmat
UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 6 No 3 (2022): Unes Journal of Swara Justisia (Oktober 2022)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/ujsj.v6i3.280

Dalam Pasal 184 Ayat (1) KUHAP dijelaskan bahwa keterangan terdakwa dalam persidangan tidak cukup untuk membuktikan terdakwa telah bersalah melakukan suatu tindak pidana tanpa didukung oleh alat-alat bukti lainya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pertimbangan hakim terhadap keterangan terdakwa dalam menjatuhkan putusan pemidanaan kepada satpam pada saat bertugas pada Putusan Nomor: 372/Pid.B/2020/PN.Pdg Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hokum yang in-concreto terhadap putusan Putusan Nomor: 372/Pid.B/2020/PN.Pdg Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu data sekunder. Terhadap semua data dan bahan yang diperoleh dari hasil penelitian disusun dan dianalisis secara kualitatif, dan disajikan dalam bentuk deskriptif kualitatif. Berdasarkan hasil pembahasan dan analisis diperoleh bahwa Pertimbangan hakim Terhadap Keterangan Terdakwa dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Pemidanaan kepada satpam pada saat bertugas pada Putusan Nomor: 372/Pid.B/2020/PN.Pdg dan Nomor: 373/Pid.B/2020/PN.Pdg telah mencakup pada pertimbangan yuridis dan non-yuridis.

The Judge's Consideration of the Defendant's Statement in Imposing a Sentence Against the Security Guard While on Duty Madjid, Neni Vesna; Akbar, Rachmat
Ekasakti Journal of Law and Justice Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): June
Publisher : Master of Law Program, Ekasakti University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60034/ejlj.v1i1.2

In Article 184 Paragraph (1) of Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHAP) it is stated that a defendant’s testimony in a trial is not sufficient to prove that the defendant has been guilty of committing a criminal offense without being supported by other evidence. There are various forms of consideration of the judge against the defendant’s testimony in criminal sentencing by the security guard on duty in the Decision Number: 372/Pid.B/2022/PN.Pdg and Decisions Number: 373/Pid.B/2022/PN.Pdg. The issues being studied are First, How is the judge’s consideration of the defendant’s testimony in criminal sentencing by a security guard on duty. (On the Decisions Number: 372/Pid.B/2020/PN.Pdg and Number: 373/Pid.B/2020/PN.Pdg)? Second, How is the judge’s decisions based on the consideration of the defendant’s testimony in criminal sentencing by a security guard on duty. (On the Decisions Number: 372/Pid.B/2020/PN.Pdg and Number: 373/Pid.B/ 2020/PN.Pdg)? This study is analytical descriptive research. The approach used in this study was normative juridical approach. The data used in this study were secondary data. All data and materials obtained from the results of the study were prepared and analyzed qualitatively, and presented in a descriptive qualitative form. Based on the results of discussion and analysis it can be concluded that. First, That the judge’s Consideration of the Defendant’s Testimony in Criminal sentencing by the Security Guard on Duty on the Decisions Number: 372/Pid.B/2020/PN.Pdg and Number: 373/Pid.B/2020/PN.Pdg has covered both juridical and non-juridical considerations. Second, That the decision of the judge Based on Consideration of The Defendant’s Testimony in criminal sentencing by the Security Guard on Duty on The Decisions Number: 372/Pid.B/2020/PN.Pdg and Number: 373/Pid.B/2020/PN.Pdg is based on the defendant’s evidence and aligned with other evidence such as witness testimony and letters.

SOSIALISASI STRATEGI BELAJAR BAHASA INGGRIS YANG EFEKTIF DAN MENYENANGKAN BAGI SISWA SD DI PADEMAWU-PAMEKASAN Zuhri, Muhammad Darrin; Kamaluddin, Moh; Muhariza, Irfan Yafie; Akbar, Rachmat; Nugraha, Vidyadhara Prawiratama
Jurnal Edukasi Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol 5 No 1 (2026): JANUARI 2026
Publisher : FIP UNIRA MALANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36636/eduabdimas.v5i1.9227

Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris pada jenjang sekolah dasar merupakan fondasi penting dalam membangun kemampuan bahasa asing siswa di masa depan. Namun, proses pembelajaran di banyak sekolah dasar masih cenderung konvensional, berpusat pada guru, dan kurang memanfaatkan pendekatan pembelajaran yang menyenangkan sehingga berdampak pada rendahnya motivasi belajar siswa. Kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini bertujuan untuk mensosialisasikan strategi belajar Bahasa Inggris yang efektif dan menyenangkan bagi siswa sekolah dasar di Kecamatan Pademawu, Kabupaten Pamekasan. Kegiatan dilaksanakan pada siswa kelas IV dan V dengan melibatkan guru kelas melalui metode penyuluhan, demonstrasi, praktik langsung, permainan edukatif, dan evaluasi sederhana. Strategi yang diperkenalkan meliputi metode Total Physical Response (TPR), pembelajaran berbasis permainan (game-based learning), serta pemanfaatan media visual dan audio. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan adanya peningkatan minat, partisipasi aktif, serta kemampuan siswa dalam mengenali dan mengucapkan kosakata dasar Bahasa Inggris. Selain itu, guru memperoleh wawasan baru mengenai variasi metode pembelajaran yang mudah diterapkan dalam kegiatan belajar mengajar. Dengan demikian, kegiatan pengabdian ini memberikan kontribusi positif dalam menciptakan pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris yang lebih komunikatif, aktif, dan menyenangkan di sekolah dasar.

Title

Found 4 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 4 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 4 Documents
Search