Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Sangidun, Muhammad

Unknown Affiliation

Author-ID : 7267236

Religion Computer Science & IT Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

1

Kewenangan KUA Kecamatan dan Pengadilan Agama Dalam Perkara Perubahan Biodata Akta Nikah Sangidun, Muhammad; Nikmah, Roykhatun
Jurnal Al-Hakim: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, Studi Syariah, Hukum dan Filantropi Vol. 4 No. 1 May 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta

This study aims to examine the authority of the District Office of Religious Affairs (KUA) and the Religious Courts in changing marriage certificate biodata. To change the biodata on the marriage certificate, it should be enough to do it at the District KUA in accordance with the provisions in PMA Number 20 of 2019 and there is no need to go through the determination of the Religious Courts because it is not legally mandated in Law Number 50 of 2009. Meanwhile, the judges of the Cilacap Religious Court granted the request for a change in the marriage certificate biodata on the grounds that it had previously submitted to the KUA but was rejected. This is not in accordance with PMA Number 20 of 2019 and Law Number 50 of 2009 it can be said that the KUA rejects cases under its authority and the Religious Courts handle cases outside its authority. With the qualitative field method, the data were collected through interviews and documentation and analyzed descriptively. The findings in the study in the form of the KUA's refusal to change the marriage certificate biodata were because the Petitioner did not fulfill the administrative requirements in the form of a birth certificate, the case of changing the marriage certificate biodata at the Cilacap Religious Court in 2020 was 309 cases, and the judge granted the request based on the provisions of Article 49 Law Number 50 of 2009. The conclusion of this research is that the KUA and the Religious Courts are both authorized to change the marriage certificate biodata, the authority attached to the KUA is absolute authority as stated in PMA Number 20 of 2020 while the Religious Courts are an expansion of authority in article 49 of the Law. Law Number 50 of 2009 because it is included in the case of the marriage sector. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meneliti kewenangan Kantor Urusan Agama (KUA) Kecamatan dan Pengadilan Agama dalam mengubah biodata akta nikah. Untuk mengubah biodata pada akta nikah seharusnya cukup dilakukan di KUA Kecamatan sesuai dengan ketentuan dalam Peraturan Menteri Agama Nomor 20 Tahun 2019 dan tidak perlu melalui penetapan Pengadilan Agama sebab secara limitatif bukan merupakan kewenangannya yang diamanatkan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 50 Tahun 2009. Sedangkan hakim Pengadilan Agama Cilacap mengkabulkan permohonan perubahan biodata akta nikah dengan alasan sebelumnya telah mengajukan ke KUA akan tetapi ditolak. Hal ini tidak sesuai dengan Peraturan Menteri Agama Nomor 20 Tahun 2019 dan Undang-Undang Nomor 50 Tahun 2009. Dapat dikatakan KUA menolak perkara yang menjadi kewenangannya dan Pengadilan Agama menangani perkara diluar kewenangannya. Temuan dalam penelitian berupa penolakan KUA mengubah biodata akta nikah adalah karena Pemohon tidak melengakpi syarat administratif berupa akta kelahiran, perkara perubahan biodata akta nikah di Pengadilan Agama Cilacap pada tahun 2020 sebanyak 309 perkara, serta hakim mengkabulkan permohonan tersebut berdasarkan ketentuan pasal 49 Undang-Undang Nomor 50 Tahun 2009. Simpulan dari penelitian ini adalah KUA dan Pengadilan Agama sama-sama berwenang mengubah biodata akta nikah, kewenangan yang melekat pada KUA merupakan kewenangan mutlak sebagaimana disebutkan dalam Peraturan Menteri Agama Nomor 20 Tahun 2019 sedangkan pada Pengadilan Agama merupakan perluasan kewenangan dalam pasal 49 Undang-Undang Nomor 50 Tahun 2009 sebab termasuk dalam perkara bidang perkawinan.

IMPLIKASI PUTUSAN TALAK VERSTEK TERHADAP HAK NAFKAH MANTAN ISTRI (ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA KARANGANYAR) Sangidun, Muhammad; Rosidah, Zaidah Nur
AS-SALAM Vol 13 No 02 (2024): PENDIDIKAN DAN HUKUM: TANTANGAN, SOLUSI
Publisher : LPPM STAI DARUSSALAM LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51226/assalam.v13i02.735

Article 149 KHI provides protection of rights to wives who are divorced through talak divorce. This protection is in the form of an obligation for ex-husbands to provide iddah and mut'ah maintenance whether this is requested or given by the judge through his ex officio rights. However, in decision number 1288/Pdt.G/2020/PA.KA. Karanganyar Religious Court, the judge decided not to grant the claim for maintenance rights even though the plaintiff was also a wife who was divorced by divorce. This research focuses on exploring the judge's reasons for rejecting the charge, as a form of judge's interpretation of the provisions of Article 149 KHI regarding case number 1288/Pdt.G/2020/PA.KA. The data in this study were obtained through primary sources of interviews with judges examining cases, as well as secondary data in the form of legal materials to find out the concrete considerations of judges in trials in the form of copies of decision number 1288/Pdt.G/2020/PA.KA and decision number 348/Pdt. G/2020/PA. Smn. The data in this study were processed and displayed in the form of descriptions, as well as analysis using deductive methods. The examining judge for case 1288/Pdt.G/2020/PA.KA interpreted the provisions of Article 149 KHI as an imperative, but limited obligation. This means that the wife's rights can be invalidated for several reasons, including because of the nusyuz wife or the absence of the wife during the divorce trial. In deciding cases, Keyword: Divorce; Iddah; Mut’ah; Living; Verstek

Criminal Law and Islamic Perspectives on The Death Penalty in Parental Murder Cases Fahmi, Zul; Sangidun, Muhammad; Ramadhan, Achmad Faiq; Qowima, Muhammad Roihan
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2025.7.2.28829

The death penalty for the murder of a child by a parent is subject to differing standards of justice and proportionality between positive law and Islamic law. This disparity requires in-depth study and analysis of judicial rationality and criminal proportionality. This study assesses the rationality of the judge’s considerations and the proportionality of the death penalty in Mandailing Natal District Court Decision No. 40/Pid.B/2025/PN Mdl (parricide murder) from the perspective of Islamic criminal law, with a focus on qishash and maqashid al-shariah. The method used is normative legal research with a doctrinal and judgment study approach; the analysis materials include a copy of the verdict, the Criminal Code, fiqh literature, and contemporary studies analyzed descriptively-qualitatively and comparatively. The results show that the panel formally assessed the fulfillment of the elements of premeditated murder so that the verdict led to the death penalty according to Article 340 of the Criminal Code. Textually, the elements of qishash were fulfilled and the victim's family did not grant forgiveness, but weaknesses in forensic and psychiatric evidence reduced factual certainty, which is an important prerequisite under Islamic criminal law before applying a commensurate punishment. Hukuman mati dalam kasus pembunuhan yang dilakukan anak terhadap orang tuanya memiliki standar keadilan dan proporsionalitas hukuman yang tidak sama antara hukum positif dan hukum Islam. Kesenjangan ini memerlukan kajian dan analisis mendalam tentang rasionalitas yudisial dan proporsionalitas pidana. Penelitian ini menilai rasionalitas pertimbangan hakim dan proporsionalitas pidana mati dalam Putusan PN Mandailing Natal No. 40/Pid.B/2025/PN Mdl (pembunuhan orang tua oleh anak) dari perspektif hukum pidana Islam, dengan fokus pada qishash dan maqashid al-shariah. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan doktrinal dan studi putusan; bahan analisis meliputi salinan putusan, KUHP, literatur fikih, dan kajian kontemporer yang dianalisis secara deskriptif-kualitatif dan komparatif. Hasil menunjukkan majelis secara formal menilai terpenuhinya unsur pembunuhan berencana sehingga vonis mengarah pada pidana mati menurut Pasal 340 KUHP. Secara tekstual unsur qishash terpenuhi dan keluarga korban tidak memberi pengampunan, namun kelemahan bukti forensik dan psikiatrik mengurangi kepastian faktual sebagai prasyarat penting menurut hukum pidana Islam sebelum menerapkan hukuman setimpal. Keywords: Death Penalty; Islamic Criminal Law; Murder of Parents; Proportionality; Rationality

Title

Found 3 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 3 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 3 Documents
Search