Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

p-Index From 2021 - 2026

2.495

P-Index

This Author published in this journals

All Journal Dimas: Jurnal Pemikiran Agama untuk Pemberdayaan Al-Ahkam Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Sriwijaya Law Review As-Salam: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam & Pendidikan Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Jurnal Supremasi El-Iqtishady JHCLS Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Desa (JPMD) Advokasi Hukum & Demokrasi Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Tafaqquh : Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah dan Ahwal Syahsiyah Malik Al-Shalih Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Tawazun: Journal of Sharia Economic Law

Zaidah Nur Rosidah

UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Author-ID : 364343

Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Nursing Social Sciences Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

1 2 3

SINKRONISASI PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN MENGENAI PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA Rosidah, Zaidah Nur
AL-AHKAM Volume 23, Nomor 1, April 2013
Publisher : AL-AHKAM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (60.419 KB)

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui sinkronisasiÂ secara horisontal maupun vertikal peraturanÂ perundang-undangan tentang perkawinan beda agamaÂ di Indonesia. Penelitian ini termasuk dalam kategori penelitian hukum normatif, yang diproyeksikan untuk meneliti harmonisasi peraturan perundang-undangan mengenai perkawinan beda agama. Pendekatan penelitian ini adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan (statue approach). Teknik pengumpulÂan data dilakukan dengan studi pustaka terhadap bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Teknik analisa data dilakukan melalui sinkronisasi secara horisontal dan vertikal. Adapun temuan dalam penelitian ini adalah: pertama, secara horisontal terjadi ketidakÂsinkronan antara UU No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan dan UU No. 23 Tahun 2006 tentang Administrasi Kependudukan. Menurut UU Perkawinan, perkawinan beda agama dilarang, sedang dalam UU Administrasi KeÂpendudukan, hal itu diperbolehkan. Kedua, secara vertikal antara UU Perkawinan dengan PP No. 9 Tahun 1975 dan Inpres No. 9 Tahun 1991 sudah terdapat sinkronisasi yaitu melarang perkawinan beda agama. Tetapi dengan Peraturan Perkawinan CampurÂan No. 158 Tahun 1898 terjadi ketidaksinkronan. UU Perkawinan melarang perkawinan mereka yang berbeda agama, sedangkan menurut Peraturan Perkawinan Campuran, perbedaan agama bukan penghalang melangsungkan perÂkawinan.***This research aims to know the horizontal and vertical synchronization of legislation on interfaith marriage in Indonesia. This study is a part of normative legal research which is projected to examine the harmonization of legislation regarding interfaith marriage. The current approachÂ of this research is legislation approach (statue approach) in which the data was collected by reciting the literature of primary and secondary legal materials. The next to analysis the data, the researcher examined them through horizontal and vertical synchronization.Â And the last, the finding outs are: the first, it horizontally occurs discrepancies between the regulation No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage and the regulation No. 23 of 2006 on Demographic and Civic Administration. According to the marriage regulation, interfaith marriage is prohibited meanwhile Demographic and Civic AdminisÂtration regulation allows it. The second, vertically, between the Marriage regulation of the Government Regulation No. 9 of 1975 and Presidential Decree No. 9 of 1991 already contained synchronization that prohibits interfaith marriage. However, the Cross Marriage Regulation No. 158 of 1898 occurred discrepancies in where Marriage regulation prohibits people to do the interfaith marriage, meanwhile according to the Cross Marriage Regulation, interfaith is not a barrier to marry.***Keywords: sinkronisasiÂ horisontal, sinkronisasi vertikal, peraturanÂ perundang-undangan, perkawinan beda agama

SINKRONISASI PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN MENGENAI PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA Rosidah, Zaidah Nur
Al-Ahkam Volume 23, Nomor 1, April, 2013
Publisher : Faculty of Shariah and Law, State Islamic University (UIN) Walisongo

This study aims to know the horizontal and vertical synchronization of legislation on interfaith marriage in Indonesia. This study is a part of normative legal research which is projected to examine the harmonization of legislation regarding interfaith marriage. The current approach of this research is legislation approach (statue approach) in which the data was collected by reciting the literature of primary and secondary legal materials. The next to analysis the data, the researcher examined them through horizontal and vertical synchronization.Â And the last, the finding outs are : Â the first, it horizontally occurs discrepancies between the regulation No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage and the regulation No. 23 of 2006 on Demographic and Civic Administration. According to the marriage regulation, interfaith marriage is prohibited meanwhile Demographic and Civic Administration regulation allows it. The second, vertically, between the Marriage regulation of the Government Regulation No. 9 of 1975 and Presidential Decree No. 9 of 1991 already contained synchronization that prohibits interfaith marriage. However, the Cross Marriage Regulation No. 158 of 1898 occurred discrepancies in where Marriage regulation prohibits people to do the interfaith marriage, meanwhile according to the Cross Marriage Regulation, interfaith is not a barrier to marry.

Pendampingan Manajemen Pengelolaan Sampah di Masyarakat Desa Gagaksipat Kecamatan Ngemplak Kabupaten Boyolali Winarto, Winarto; Mahfiana, Layyin; Rosyidah, Zaidah Nur; Wicaksono, Andi
Dimas: Jurnal Pemikiran Agama untuk Pemberdayaan Vol 19, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : LP2M of Institute for Research and Community Services - UIN Walisongo

This fostering program on waste management to the community of Gagaksipat is to provide the knowledge on how to manage waste properly. Further, it also aims not only to reduce waste but also to get beneficiat profit from the waste. The participants for this programm were 60 residents of Gagaksipat Village, Ngemplak, Boyolali through purposive sampling. As the partners for the programm is Team from the Kopen Tourism and Education Village (KWEK) Kopen 1/7 Ngadirejo Kartasura Sukoharjo. The technique carried out was in the form of training and continued with monitoring and evaluating at the end of the activity. The theoretical basis of this activity is UU No. 18 of 2008 concerning waste processing. The seriousness and necessity of waste management starts from upstream to downstream with the implementation of concepts such as 3R (Reuse, Reduse, Recycle) and then up to 5R (Revalue and Recovery). The results of this fostering progamm will make the community more aware of and contribute to good and healthy waste management; provide community supplies to manage organic waste properly through biopori activities and provide supplies to the community to manage inorganic waste through waste management skills.Â Program pendampingan ini bertujuan untuk memberikan pelatihan managemen pengelolaan sampah kepada masyarakat agar sampah dikelola dengan baik, tidak menumpuk yang mengakibatkan pencemaran lingkungan dan membahayakan kehidupan terutama bagi kesehatan masyarakat. Pendampingan ini mengupas tentang pengelolaan sampah dengan baik agar tidak membuat petaka, tetapi mendatangkan manfaat secara ekonomi bagi masyarakat.Subyek pendampingan ini adalah 60 warga Desa Gagaksipat Kecamatan Ngemplak Kabupaten Boyolali yang diperoleh melalui purposive sampling. Adapun mitra pendamping dalam pelatihan ini adalah Tim dari Kampung Wisata dan Edukasi Kopen (KWEK) Kopen 1/7 Ngadirejo Kartasura Sukoharjo.Teknik yang dilakukan dalam pendampingan ini berbentuk pelatihan dan dilanjutkan dengan monitoring dan evaluasi diakhir kegiatan. Landasan teori kegiatan ini adalah UU No. 18 Tahun 2008 tentang pengolahan sampah. Keseriusan dan keharusan pengelolaan sampah mulai diperhatikan dari hulu sampai hilir dengan implementasi konsep seperti 3R (Reuse, Reduse, Recycle) kemudian sampai 5R (Revalue dan Recovery). Hasil dari pendampingan ini membuat masyarakat semakin menumbuhkan kesadaran dan peranan terhadap pengelolaan sampah yang baik dan sehat; memberikan bekal masyarakat untuk mengelola sampah organik dengan baik melalui kegiatan biopori dan memberikan bekal kepada masyarakat untuk mengelola sampah anorganik melalui keterampilan pengelolaan sampah.

SINKRONISASI PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN MENGENAI PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA Zaidah Nur Rosidah
Al-Ahkam Volume 23, Nomor 1, April, 2013
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang

This study aims to know the horizontal and vertical synchronization of legislation on interfaith marriage in Indonesia. This study is a part of normative legal research which is projected to examine the harmonization of legislation regarding interfaith marriage. The current approach of this research is legislation approach (statue approach) in which the data was collected by reciting the literature of primary and secondary legal materials. The next to analysis the data, the researcher examined them through horizontal and vertical synchronization. And the last, the finding outs are : the first, it horizontally occurs discrepancies between the regulation No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage and the regulation No. 23 of 2006 on Demographic and Civic Administration. According to the marriage regulation, interfaith marriage is prohibited meanwhile Demographic and Civic Administration regulation allows it. The second, vertically, between the Marriage regulation of the Government Regulation No. 9 of 1975 and Presidential Decree No. 9 of 1991 already contained synchronization that prohibits interfaith marriage. However, the Cross Marriage Regulation No. 158 of 1898 occurred discrepancies in where Marriage regulation prohibits people to do the interfaith marriage, meanwhile according to the Cross Marriage Regulation, interfaith is not a barrier to marry.

Orientasi Filosofis Hakim Pengadilan Agama Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Zaidah Nur Rosidah; Lego Karjoko
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 28 No. 1: JANUARI 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol28.iss1.art8

The purpose of this study is to determine the philosophical basis in the legal finding school of thoughts used by religious court judges and their orientation in resolving sharia economic disputes. The research problem is answered by using a normative method with a case and conceptual approach. The results of the research and discussion conclude that first, sharia economic dispute resolution has a philosophical foundation from the values of Pancasila, especially the first, second and fifth principles. Second, there are two different orientations of religious court judges in deciding sharia economic disputes, namely legism oriented and begriffjurisprudenz orientation. Amongst the various decisions, there are judges that are still oriented towards legism, namely deciding disputes based on existing positive laws, based on the Civil Code (KUHPer) even though the dispute is a sharia economic dispute. There are also many judges who have an orientation to begriffjurisprudenz, in this case the judge uses the basis of Islamic law, namely the Al Quran, Hadith and the Fatwa of the National Sharia Council (DSN) of the Indonesian Ulama Council (MUI) and the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law (KHES) in their decisions in addition to using the Civil Code (positive law).

The Government’s Role in Interfaith Marriage Rights Protection: A Case Study of Adjustment and Social Integration Zaidah Nur Rosidah; Lego Karjoko; Mohd Rizal Palil
Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System Vol 3, No 2 (2023): Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/jhcls.v3i2.105

The research aims to determine the government's role in interfaith marriage rights protection in Indonesia and Malaysia. This research belongs to normative research that examines the role of government in the religious difference in marriage in Indonesia and Malaysia. This research employed a case approach, namely the study of the role of government in interfaith marriage rights protection. The techniques of collecting law items were conducted using literature research, while the analysis techniques were performed using deductive syllogism and interpretative methods. The results indicated that interfaith marriages are not technically recognized in Indonesia since the marriage connection is regarded to be a contract between two persons of the same religion. While this is going on, interesting cases frequently take place near the Malaysian and Indonesian borders, particularly in the Sambas region. The Indonesian government's role in intermarriage rights protection is manifested in the Indonesian judiciary. The courts have sanctioned multiple interfaith marriages. Religious conflicts that occur in Malaysia cannot be avoided. It may become a ticking time bomb or a flesh-piercing thorn

Sosialisasi Etika Berwirausaha Islami di Era Covid-19:: Pengabdian Masyarakat di Dusun Dibal Tengah, Dibal, Ngemplak, Boyolali Andi Mardian; Zaidah Nur Rosidah; Siti Rokhaniyah
Advokasi Hukum & Demokrasi (AHD) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Advokasi Hukum dan Demokrasi (AHD)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Prof Gayus Lumbuun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61234/ahd.v1i1.28

The Covid-19 pandemic has an impact on all aspects of people's lives, including the economic aspect. Among the effects of the Covid-19 Pandemic felt by most people in terms of the economy are; income decreased until they were forced to lose their jobs. In difficult conditions like this, not a few people are trying to make ends meet without paying attention to ethics. This is due to the pressure of difficult circumstances and the absence of an understanding of the importance of applying Islamic ethics in work and/or entrepreneurship. The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic was also felt by the majority of residents of Central Dibal, Dibal Village, Ngemplak District, Boyolali Regency. In order to anticipate various unethical actions in work and entrepreneurship, it is necessary to socialize about Islamic entrepreneurship ethics. The aim is to educate the public about the importance of ethical principles of Islamic entrepreneurship, especially in unfavorable circumstances as a result of the Covid-19 Pandemic. This socialization activity was carried out using the lecture method from the resource persons and continued with questions and answers and discussions. Residents of Central Dibal feel a number of benefits from the implementation of this community service activity. Among the benefits obtained are; (1) people get comprehensive knowledge about ethics in doing business or entrepreneurship in an Islamic way; (2) the public is aware of the importance of understanding entrepreneurship in an Islamic way in order to avoid sustenance that is not blessed; (3) the community feels the importance of applying Islamic entrepreneurship ethics in various conditions, even though the economic conditions are difficult in the midst of the Covid-19 Pandemic that hit. Keywords: Islamic entrepreneurship ethics; Covid-19 pandemic; socialization

IMPLEMENTASI PERMA NOMOR 5 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG SERTIFIKASI HAKIM EKONOMI SYARIAH TERHADAP PENANGANAN PERKARA DI PENGADILAN AGAMA SUKOHARJO Khaidar Rohman; Sutrisno; Zaidah nur rosidah; Fairuz Sabiq
El-Iqthisadi Volume 5 Nomor 1 Juni 2023
Publisher : Jurusan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Uin Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/el-iqthisady.vi.35621

Abstract Tulisan ini mengkaji Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 5 Tahun 2019 tentang Sertifikasi Hakim Ekonomi Syariah, ditegaskan bahwa masalah Ekonomi Syariah sebagai bentuk kewenangan mutlak Pengadilan Agama guna penyelesaian permasalahan atau perkara sengketa perekonomian Syariah. Keberadaan peraturan ini semakin meyakinkan masyarakat bahwa pengadilan agama memiliki kerangka hukum dan bahwasanya hakim pengadilan agama memiliki yurisdiksi khusus atas kasus ekonomi syariah. Dengan adanya peraturan tersebut, bertujuan agar tercipta efektifitas dalam meningkatkan penanganan masalah ekonomi syariah di lingkungan peradilan agama guna memenuhi rasa keadilan untuk seluruh pihak dengan mengalami perkara. Kata Kunci : Ekonomi syariah, Hakim, Keadilan. Abstract This paper examines Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2019 concerning Certification of Sharia Economic Judges, emphasizing that Sharia Economic issues are a form of absolute authority of the Religious Courts to resolve Sharia economic problems or dispute cases. The existence of this regulation further convinces the public that the religious courts have a legal framework and that religious court judges have special jurisdiction over sharia economic cases. With this regulation, it aims to create effectiveness in improving the handling of sharia economic problems in the religious court environment in order to fulfill a sense of justice for all parties who experience cases. Keywords: Islamic economics, judges, justice.

Efektivitas E-Court dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Pengadilan Agama Surakarta Ryan Alan Firnanda; Nur Rosidah, Zaidah
Jurnal Supremasi Volume 14 Nomor 1 Tahun 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Balitar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35457/supremasi.v14i1.3400

E-Court as an electronic justice system formed based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 of 2018 (PERMA 3/2018) jo PERMA 1 of 2019, regulates e-filling (registration), e-payment (payment), e-summons (summons), and e-litigation (trial). The application of digitalization breakthroughs and innovations to the justice system in Indonesia is urgent to know its effectiveness, especially in the aspect of sharia economic dispute resolution, considering Indonesia as the largest Muslim country in the world. Through empirical legal research at the Surakarta Religious Court, it is known that the implementation of e-court in sharia economic dispute resolution at the Surakarta Religious Court has not been optimally accepted by the litigants, and still has many obstacles that must be corrected.

Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/Puu-Viii/2010 Tentang Hak Perdata Anak Luar Kawin Di Pengadilan Negeri Dan Pengadilan Agama Surakarta Zaidah Nur Rosidah
Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah dan Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2017): Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22515/alahkam.v2i2.1067

Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana implementasi putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 tentang Hak Perdata Anak Luar Kawin di Pengadilan Negeri dan Pengadilan Agama Surakarta, khususnya pendapat para hakim mengenai implementasi putusan tersebut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam karya tulis ini menggunakan pendekatan socio legal study, bagaimana putusan MK tentang anak luar kawin diimplementasikan dalam putusannya. Jenis penelitiannya adalah penelitian lapangan, yaitu menggali pendapat hakim mengenai implementasi putusan MK tersebut. Lokasi penelitian di Pengadilan Negeri dan Pengadilan Agama Surakarta. Pengumpulan data primer dilakukan dengan wawancara terstrukutur, sedangkan pengumpulan data sekunder dilakukan melalui studi pustaka bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Untuk memperoleh jawaban atas permasalahan penelitian dilakukan 3 alur kegiatan yang terjadi secara bersamaan yaitu reduksi data, penyajian data, penarikan kesimpulan/verifikasi silogisme deduksi. Melalui karya tulis ini diperoleh hasil bahwa pertama, putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 belum dapat diimplementasikan secara penuh baik di pengadilan agama maupun di pengadilan negeri. Kedua, di Pengadilan Agama, putusan tersebut dianggap bertentangan dengan hukum Islam yang menyatakan anak luar kawin hanya mempunyai hubungan perdata dengan ibunya dan keluarga ibunya, sehingga anak luar kawin tidak dapat bernasab dengan ayah biologisnya serta tidak mendapatkan hak waris dan wali. Ketiga, menurut hakim di Pengadilan Negeri, putusan MK tersebut sudah diakomodasi di dalam KUH Perdata bahwa anak luar kawin dapat diakui melalui pengadilan, dan terhadap pengakuan tersebut anak luar kawin memperoleh hak waris yang besarnya tidak penuh seperti anak sah.

Co-Authors Afthon Yazid Andi Mardian Andi Mardian, Andi Diana Zuhroh Fairuz Sabiq Fitri Lestari, Arum I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rahmi Handayani Khaidar Rohman Lego Karjoko Lego Karjoko Lego Karjoko Lego Karjoko Lego Karjoko Liza Priandhini Masjupri Moch. Munir, Layyin Mahfiana I Nyoman Nurjaya Mohd Rizal Palil Mohd Rizal Palil Muhammad Khoiru Sa’i Muhdi Putra, Ressa Ananda Roykhatun Nikmah Ryan Alan Firnanda Sangidun, Muhammad Siti Rokhaniyah SUTRISNO Umi Rohmah wati, asiah Winarto Winarto

Title

Found 21 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 21 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 21 Documents
Search