Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Islamic Civil Society and Constitutionalism Issues in Indonesia: Observing the Expressions of the Banyumas Muslim Community in Responding to the Dynamics of State Problems in Post-Reformation Khashogi, Luqman Rico; Humaidi, M. Wildan
International Journal of Social Science and Religion (IJSSR) 2023: Volume 4 Issue 3
Publisher : Indonesian Academy of Social and Religious Research (IASRR)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53639/ijssr.v4i3.193

Abstract

This research seeks to map out the expressions of the Banyumas Muslim community in responding to the dynamics of state problems in post-reformation with the Big Five theory (Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neurotism). This research not only maps the potential involvement of Islamic civil society, but also contributes an important perspective as an effort to stabilize society and its various social groups. The method of collecting data was by distributing purposive questionnaires collecting 165 people. All of them consisted of various Islamic community organizations. The reliability used test-retest reliability, based on Friedman's theory with the lowest limitation of 0.90. The validity used direct validity, which is based on the development of the Big Five theory by Kathrin Ackermann, with moderate adjustments and concrete adaptations, thus it can be used operationally. The results of the study show that on the one hand, they have the character of extraversion (E) which has a more conservative attitude, encourages acceptance of hierarchy, and has more high trust in institutionalized matters. But on the other hand, they tend to be openness to experience (O) characters who have a critical attitude towards political, social values, norms and authority.
State-Religion Relations and Halal Governance: Islamic Legal Policy in Indonesia and Malaysia Humaidi, M. Wildan; Ridwan; Salleh, Mohd Mahyeddin Mohd
Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Vol. 20 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of State Islamic University of Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri, Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/mnh.v20i1.15374

Abstract

The relationship between religion and the state has long been a subject of scholarly debate. This relationship is commonly classified into three dominant models: the integralist model, in which religion and the state are fully integrated; the secularist model, which maintains a strict separation between religious and political spheres; and the symbiotic-mutualistic model, which seeks a proportional balance between the two. This study examines how these frameworks are manifested in halal policy governance in Southeast Asia, with a particular focus on Indonesia and Malaysia. Employing a comparative qualitative approach, data were collected through document analysis, relevant scholarly sources, and interviews with key stakeholders. The findings indicate that constitutional recognition of religion does not necessarily determine the structure of halal policy governance. In Indonesia, halal policy is embedded within the state bureaucracy and religious authority through the Halal Product Assurance Law. In contrast, in Malaysia, halal certification is institutionalized under the Department of Islamic Development Malaysia (JAKIM), shaped by considerations of trade and economic development. In both cases, halal certification has evolved beyond a purely religious obligation into a strategic political–economic instrument with global relevance. This study concludes that halal governance reflects a hybridization of religious, political, and economic factors, highlighting the importance of analyzing halal policy within the framework of global political economy. The findings contribute theoretically to the growing field of halal political economy studies, particularly in understanding state–religion relations in Southeast Asia. Halal governance can no longer be viewed merely as an instrument of religious policy but has become a strategic domain within the global political economy.