Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Linguistic Harmonization: Dissecting Alfiyah Ibn Malik with Chomsky's Transformational Generative Theory Khoirul Mubin; Nasiruddin; Boby Bagas Purnama; Dionisia Folliero
Alibbaa': Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : IAIN Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19105/ajpba.v5i2.14610

Abstract

This study is motivated by the need to update and deepen the understanding of Alfiyah Ibnu Malik through a modern linguistic perspective, given the complexity of the 1,002 stanzas that are difficult for students with a weak language foundation to comprehend, and the existing gap in the literature regarding the application of Transformational Generative Theory (TGT) in Arabic grammar, which can help elucidate language structure and enhance understanding and interest in learning. This research aims to examine Alfiyah Ibnu Malik using the modern linguistic approach of Transformational Generative Theory (TGT). The research method applied is library research with a descriptive qualitative approach. The findings indicate that Transformational Generative Theory has specific characteristics in linguistic studies, including deep and surface structures, the concepts of competence and performance, as well as specific and general transformations. Additionally, TGT includes a universal grammar that can be applied to Alfiyah Ibnu Malik. The application of TGT to Alfiyah Ibnu Malik reveals that specific transformations occur in various aspects of Arabic grammar, including optional and obligatory deletion, optional substitution, optional replacement, optional expansion, optional addition, and optional and obligatory permutation.
A Comparative Discourse on Istidlāl Hadīṡ for the Recitation of Basmalah in Prayer: Perspectives of Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah: Kajian Komparatif mengenai Istidlāl Hadīṡ Bacaan Basmalah dalam Shalat: Perspektif Nahdlatul Ulama dan Muhammadiyah Khoirul Mubin; Toha Harun Al Rasyid; Unzilatun Nikmah; Rodli al Anshori
Jurnal Living Hadis Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/livinghadis.2024.5727

Abstract

The discourse surrounding the recitation of Basmalah in Al-Fatihah during prayer has consistently been a contentious issue within society, particularly between members of Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) and Muhammadiyah. This divergence arises from differences in perspectives and variations in the interpretation of istidlāl (legal reasoning) derived from hadith used by both groups. This study examines the methods and approaches employed by NU and Muhammadiyah in understanding, interpreting, and formulating legal rulings based on hadith. The research focuses on two primary questions: First, what methods are implemented by NU and Muhammadiyah in istidlāl hadith? Second, what narrations serve as their foundational basis for legal rulings? These questions are explored through a descriptive-analytical method grounded in literature review. The findings reveal that; first, NU and Muhammadiyah each have dedicated institutions tasked with understanding Islamic legal sources and issuing fatwas—namely, the Lembaga Bahtsul Masail for NU and the Majelis Tarjih for Muhammadiyah; second, Nahdlatul Ulama employs the qauly, ilhaqy, and manhajy methods in interpreting Islamic legal sources, whereas Muhammadiyah utilizes the bayani, ta'lili, and istishlahi methods; and third, Regarding the recitation of Basmalah in prayer, NU considers it obligatory and recommends its recitation aloud (jahr), based on istidlāl qauli referring to Imam Shafi'i's opinion in Al-Umm. In contrast, Muhammadiyah allows for Basmalah to be recited either silently (sirr) or aloud (jahr), using the bayani method, which draws on hadith narrated by Imam Malik in Al-Muwatta’, offering a more flexible interpretation of the recitation of Basmalah.
FOMO SEBAGAI REFLEKSI KRISIS HARGA DIRI: TINJAUAN INTEGRATIF PSIKOLOGI MODERN DAN NILAI ISLAM Wantomo Diar Gumelar; Khoirul Mubin
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 10 No. 03 (2025): Volume 10 No. 03 September 2025 Terbit
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v10i03.31078

Abstract

The phenomenon of Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) has emerged as a significant psychosocial impact experienced by generation Z in the digital era, primarily due to their high dependence on social validation through social media. FoMO is closely related to low self-esteem, where individuals tend to experience social anxiety and psychological pressure from feeling left out of others’ social experiences. This study aims to examine FoMO as a manifestation of a self-esteem crisis and to offer an integration between modern psychological approaches and Islamic spiritual values as an alternative solution. The method used is qualitative research with a library research approach, analyzing contemporary psychological theories and the Islamic concept of self-worth. The findings show that FoMO is a response to unstable self-esteem that relies heavily on social approval. Individuals with low self-esteem are more vulnerable to digital pressure and social comparison. Islamic values such as izzah (dignity), muru’ah (moral integrity), and iḥsān (spiritual awareness) offer a more stable and transcendental paradigm of self-worth. This integration provides a holistic approach to strengthening the psychological resilience of generation Z amid the growing FoMO phenomenon.