Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)
Lazuardi, Irwan
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Model for resolving election violations through Indonesian Election Body and Constitutional Court Borman, M. Syahrul; Marwiyah, Siti; Cornelis, Vieta Imelda; Lazuardi, Irwan; Kaewhanam, Phimlikid
Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 32 No. 2 (2024): September
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ljih.v32i2.33711

Abstract

This study formulates a model for resolving disputes over election violations through the Election Supervisory Body and the Constitutional Court in Indonesia. This research analyses juridical and normative theories, policies, and legal decisions, as well as studies of cases of election violations in 2014 and 2019. This research method uses qualitative research with a grounded theory approach and a normative juridical approach. The data sources comprise primary and secondary legal materials. The results of this study show that 1) Problems with violations of the electoral process and disputes over election results have not been resolved properly. 2) The model of resolving violations of the electoral process and disputes over election results is with a settlement model approach through the Application of the Critical Attitude Model of Public Militancy and Law Enforcement Militancy by the Election Supervisory Body and the Constitutional Court.
ANALYSIS OF INFORMED CONSENT AS THE LEGAL PROTECTION OF PHYSICIAN RELATIONSHIPS AND PATIENTS IN MALPRACTICE CASES: (Case Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 21/Pdt.G/2018/PN Mnk) Lazuardi, Irwan; Marwiyah, Siti
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES Vol. 2 No. 4 (2023): OCTOBER
Publisher : Transpublika Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55047/polri.v2i4.774

Abstract

The implementation of medical behavior involves two parties, namely doctors or other health workers as executors of medical behavior and patients as recipients of medical behavior bound in Informed Consent. However, the occurrence of malpractice cases causes the role of Informed Consent to be doubted both from the patient and doctor's side because the validity of Informed Consent becomes biased if there is no legal basis and knowledge of the agreement. The research aims to analyze the role of Informed Consent as legal protection for the relationship between doctors and patients in cases of malpractice and to analyze the legal remedies given to doctors and patients in malpractice cases in Supreme Court Decision Number 21/Pdt.G/2018/PN Mnk. This type of research is normative research using a statutory-based approach. The process of collecting data through a literature study with an analysis of legal materials through a qualitative descriptive analysis. The results of the study prove that the role of informed consent as legal protection is not entirely a determinant of a case being declared as malpractice. From the decision Number 21/Pdt.G/2018/PN Mnk it was concluded that the existence of Informed Consent could not be used as legal protection because the doctor was proven to have made a mistake in setting the drug dosage. Related to the legal protection given to patients who are victims of malpractice is the Health Law no. 23 of 1992 which gives everyone the right to ask for compensation for mistakes and negligence committed by health workers.
Co-Authors Borman, M. Syahrul Cornelis, Vieta Imelda Kaewhanam, Phimlikid Siti Marwiyah