Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

MASA DEPAN DEMOKRTASI: PROPORSIONAL TERBUKA DAN TERTUTUP Jaang, Syaharie
Jurnal Pengabdian Kreativitas Pendidikan Mahakam (JPKPM) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Juni
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Demokrasi merupakan salah satu sarana untuk mencapai tujuan, yaitu tujuan untuk mengubah arah kebijakan negara, bilaman dalam kontestan pemilihan umum para calon pemimpin masa depan negara terpilih secara demokratis akan melakukan perubahan sesuai kehendak rakyat. Demokrasi adalah instrument yang memberikan peluang dan kebebasan kepada setiap warga negara untuk bersaing dalam merih kemenangan secara jujur, adil dan demokratis. Kemenangan dimaksud adalah kemenangan menjadi pemimpin masa depan bangsa dan negara dalam suatu pemilihan umum. Pemilihan umum adalah pesta rakyat yang menginginkan negara mengalami perubahan yang signinfikan, khususnya dalam bidang penegakkan hukum, politik bersih, sehingga kesejahteraan dan kemakmuran rakyat akan terwujud. Tanpa adanya pemilihan umum, negara akan melahirkan tirani-tirani baru yang akan menggerogoti demokrasi dan hukum secara perlahan-lahan, hingga pada akhirnya negara akan mengalami kerusakan, dan bahkan bisa menjadi musnah. Pemilihan umum yang telah dan akan diselenggarakan tersebut adalah salah satu implementasi demokrasi. Tegaknya demokrasi sangat tergantung pada unsur-unsur penopang, salah satunya adalah instrument hukum.
Ensuring Electoral Integrity Through Professional and Ethical Election Organizers Jaidun, Jaidun; Jaang, Syaharie
Indonesian Journal of Public Policy Review Vol 25 No 3 (2024): July
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijppr.v25i3.1420

Abstract

General Background: The integrity of a nation's leadership is fundamentally shaped by the credibility of its electoral process. A free, secret, and fair presidential election ensures the emergence of leaders who govern with professionalism, transparency, and accountability. However, the effectiveness of electoral institutions is often compromised by political influence and material interests. Specific Background: In Indonesia, electoral integrity is upheld by institutions such as the General Election Commission (KPU), the Election Supervisory Body (BAWASLU), and the Honorary Council for General Election Organizers (DKPP). Despite their mandate, these institutions face significant challenges related to political interference, which undermines their ability to conduct elections transparently and fairly. Knowledge Gap: While numerous studies have examined election integrity, limited research specifically addresses the moral and professional challenges faced by electoral institutions in Indonesia. The extent to which political and economic pressures affect the neutrality of election organizers remains an area requiring deeper investigation. Aims: This study aims to analyze the professionalism of electoral organizers in Indonesia’s presidential elections by assessing legal frameworks, ethical considerations, and institutional challenges. Results: Findings indicate that electoral officials must uphold strong moral principles and legal accountability to withstand internal and external pressures. Ensuring free and fair elections requires institutional integrity, which is currently threatened by undue influence from powerful political entities. Novelty: This research highlights the ethical dilemmas faced by election organizers, emphasizing the need for robust legal and institutional safeguards to protect electoral integrity. Unlike previous studies, it provides an in-depth analysis of both internal and external challenges affecting electoral professionalism. Implications: Strengthening legal mechanisms and enhancing institutional independence are crucial to maintaining the credibility of electoral processes. This study underscores the necessity of professional and ethical electoral organizers in fostering democratic governance and national stability. Highlights: Electoral Integrity – Fair elections ensure accountable and transparent leadership. Institutional Challenges – Political influence threatens election organizers’ neutrality. Strengthening Governance – Legal safeguards protect democracy and electoral integrity. Keywords: Electoral integrity, election organizers, political interference, professional ethics, democratic governance.
ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERDATA DIPENGADILAN Jaidun, Jaidun; Jaang, Syaharie
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 16 No. 2 (2024): Agustus
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v16i2.2997

Abstract

Settlement of civil disputes through a judge mediator is regulated in Article 1 paragraph (2) of the Republic of Indonesia Supreme Court Regulation number 1 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Mediation in Court which states that a mediator is a Judge or other party who has a Mediator Certificate as a neutral party to assist the Parties in the negotiation process to seek various possibilities for resolving disputes without having to make a decision or force a resolution. The parties can use Alternative Dispute Resolution to reach a mutually beneficial agreement. The research used is non-doctrinal legal research, or can also be called research about law. The data used is primary data, namely data obtained directly from research subjects such as interviews. Apart from that, secondary data comes from statutory regulations and literature. Then the data obtained was analyzed qualitatively. The parties use the services of a certified mediator, because this is influenced by 2 factors, namely: (1) They do not want to pay the costs of hiring a certified mediator (2) There are no provisions governing the obligations of the parties to use a certified mediator. The failure of the peace agreement between the parties was caused by 2 factors, namely: (1) Having a strong desire to take the litigation route. (2) It is difficult to entrust the resolution of legal conflicts to a mediator. (3) Still holding a grudge that is difficult to reconcile. Mediators provide convenience and open access to information for the parties to achieve peace. Obstacles to peaceful efforts in court are (1) The parties have a strong desire to resolve civil conflicts through litigation (court). (2) The parties find it difficult to trust the mediator to resolve their conflict. (3) Both parties still hold grudges that are difficult to reconcile
Ensuring Electoral Integrity Through Professional and Ethical Election Organizers: Memastikan Integritas Pemilu Melalui Penyelenggara Pemilu yang Profesional dan Beretika Jaidun, Jaidun; Jaang, Syaharie
Indonesian Journal of Public Policy Review Vol. 25 No. 3 (2024): July
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijppr.v25i3.1420

Abstract

General Background: The integrity of a nation's leadership is fundamentally shaped by the credibility of its electoral process. A free, secret, and fair presidential election ensures the emergence of leaders who govern with professionalism, transparency, and accountability. However, the effectiveness of electoral institutions is often compromised by political influence and material interests. Specific Background: In Indonesia, electoral integrity is upheld by institutions such as the General Election Commission (KPU), the Election Supervisory Body (BAWASLU), and the Honorary Council for General Election Organizers (DKPP). Despite their mandate, these institutions face significant challenges related to political interference, which undermines their ability to conduct elections transparently and fairly. Knowledge Gap: While numerous studies have examined election integrity, limited research specifically addresses the moral and professional challenges faced by electoral institutions in Indonesia. The extent to which political and economic pressures affect the neutrality of election organizers remains an area requiring deeper investigation. Aims: This study aims to analyze the professionalism of electoral organizers in Indonesia’s presidential elections by assessing legal frameworks, ethical considerations, and institutional challenges. Results: Findings indicate that electoral officials must uphold strong moral principles and legal accountability to withstand internal and external pressures. Ensuring free and fair elections requires institutional integrity, which is currently threatened by undue influence from powerful political entities. Novelty: This research highlights the ethical dilemmas faced by election organizers, emphasizing the need for robust legal and institutional safeguards to protect electoral integrity. Unlike previous studies, it provides an in-depth analysis of both internal and external challenges affecting electoral professionalism. Implications: Strengthening legal mechanisms and enhancing institutional independence are crucial to maintaining the credibility of electoral processes. This study underscores the necessity of professional and ethical electoral organizers in fostering democratic governance and national stability. Highlights: Electoral Integrity – Fair elections ensure accountable and transparent leadership. Institutional Challenges – Political influence threatens election organizers’ neutrality. Strengthening Governance – Legal safeguards protect democracy and electoral integrity. Keywords: Electoral integrity, election organizers, political interference, professional ethics, democratic governance.