Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review Academia Open QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia JURMA YUSTISI
Hartono, Margareta Kristiani
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemistry Computer Science & IT Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Review of Land Ownership Certificate Dispute Settlement Based on Kupang PTUN Decision Number 42/G/2023/PTUN.KPG Suryani, Cendana; Hartono, Margareta Kristiani; Rasji, Rasji
QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol 3, No 1 (2024): June 2024
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/qistina.v3i1.2417

Abstract

Agricultural issues are complex and sensitive problems that affect many aspects of life, including social, economic, political, and psychological aspects. Land disputes are a recurring and relevant topic. Obtaining land as a capital for various needs along with population growth, development trends, and access to various parties. Ways to resolve land disputes can be done through mediation, arbitration, or litigation. Mediation is the preferred method because it is a family matter and does not require a large cost. Arbitration is a method of resolving disputes outside the court with a neutral third party as an arbitrator. Litigation is a method of resolving disputes through the court, and it is the last resort. The research method used is through the use of primary data, namely mediation data and legal documents related to land disputes for a total of people. The Minister of Agriculture and Plantation Regulation No. 11 and the Director General of the National Land Agency in 2016 on Land Dispute Resolution states that land disputes can be resolved both within and outside the court.
Blockchain in the Global Trade Ecosystem: Efficiency, Transparency, and Security Hartono, Margareta Kristiani
JURNAL MAHASISWA YUSTISI Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/jurmayustisi.v3i1.1493

Abstract

Blockchain is an innovative technology that has the potential to revolutionize the global trade ecosystem by providing unprecedented efficiency, transparency, and security. This article examines the role of blockchain in addressing the main challenges of international trade, such as complex bureaucracy, fraud risks, and lack of data visibility. Blockchain enables decentralized, permanent, and immutable data recording, thereby creating a more secure and trustworthy system. Through the implementation of smart contracts, this technology simplifies administrative processes such as export-import documentation, customs, and cross-border payments, ultimately reducing operational costs and speeding up transactions. Additionally, blockchain provides real-time product tracking from producers to end consumers, ensuring product authenticity and compliance with ethical and sustainability standards. However, despite offering significant benefits, the adoption of blockchain in global trade faces challenges such as non-uniform regulations, scalability limitations of the technology, and the need for high initial investment. This article not only identifies the potential of blockchain in enhancing international trade efficiency but also provides strategic recommendations to overcome these barriers. With proper implementation, blockchain can serve as a catalyst for transforming global trade into a more inclusive and sustainable system
PEMBATALAN MEREK YANG TELAH TERDAFTAR BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG MEREK NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2016 Hartono, Margareta Kristiani; Suryani, Cendana; Syailendra, Moody Rizqy
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.652

Abstract

Brand registration is protection in the form of registering the brand itself to the Directorate General of Intellectual Property Rights. Regarding trademark registration, a form of government protection for trademark registration is that a trademark can only be registered based on an application submitted by the trademark owner who is known to be in good faith or according to the principle of good faith. Trademark Cancellation according to Prof. Dr. Rahmi Jened is a procedure taken by one party to search for and eliminate the registration existence of a mark from the General Register of Marks or cancel the validity of rights based on a mark certificate. The purpose of this article is to analyze the protection of registered trademarks against use by other parties. The research method used is Normative Juridical Law method. Law with an analytical-descriptive definition investigates and investigates trademark violations in connection with the brand law number 20 of 2016 and information related to several cases that have been rife. Based on the results of the research, it is concluded that the owner of the trademark rights fulfills the requirements under the trademark and identification law. And those who feel that their brand names are similar are entitled to legal protection from the government. This legal protection can be in the form of preventive legal protection and oppressive reparation. It is necessary to provide evidence to the violators of the brand of violation which later, if proven, will definitely take responsibility for their actions. the responsibility is carried out maybe the trademark is invalid because the trademark violator has an element of bad faith towards the registered trademark and if proven this results in a lot of losses for the trademark that has been registered and furthermore the brand offender must pay compensation.
Harmonization of Standard Insurance Clauses: A Consumer Protection and Fairness Perspective: Harmonisasi Klausula Baku Asuransi: Perspektif Perlindungan Konsumen dan Keadilan Hartono, Margareta Kristiani; Lie, Gunardi
Academia Open Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/acopen.10.2025.12912

Abstract

General Background: Standardized insurance contracts containing boilerplate clauses dominate the industry due to efficiency demands. Specific Background: However, these clauses create structural inequalities in bargaining power and limit consumers’ ability to understand or negotiate policy terms. Knowledge Gap: Existing regulations, including the Consumer Protection Law, prohibit unfair terms yet remain insufficient to address ambiguities, exoneration clauses, and inconsistencies between legal norms and market practice. Aims: This study analyzes the legal implications of standard insurance clauses, their impact on contractual fairness, and the necessity of harmonized regulation to protect consumers. Results: Findings reveal that unilateral clause drafting perpetuates information asymmetry and facilitates claim denials, while oversight by regulators and dispute-resolution bodies remains fragmented. Novelty: The study proposes a responsive regulatory model that integrates preventive supervision by the Financial Services Authority, normative statutory safeguards, and corrective judicial interpretation—particularly through doctrines such as contra proferentem and reasonable expectations. Implications: Harmonizing essential clauses can balance contractual freedom with substantive fairness, strengthen consumer protection, and enhance transparency and trust in Indonesia’s insurance ecosystem. Highlights: Highlights how boilerplate insurance clauses create structural bargaining power imbalances and legal uncertainty for consumers. Identifies the gap between consumer protection norms and their implementation in regulating standard insurance policy terms. Proposes a responsive regulatory model combining OJK supervision, statutory safeguards, and judicial doctrines such as contra proferentem. Keywords: Boilerplate Clauses, Insurance Contracts, Consumer Protection, Contractual Fairness, Harmonization  
Co-Authors Lie, Gunardi Moody Rizqy Syailendra Putra Rasji, Rasji Suryani, Cendana