Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal CEMERLANG :Jurnal Manajemen dan Ekonomi Bisnis Jurnal Manajemen dan Ekonomi Kreatif Jurnal Relasi Publik Silatene : Jurnal Sosial Humaniora
Amanda Istianah Mutiawati
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Pelaksanaan Kompensasi Terhadap Pekerja Yang Di PHK (Studi Kasus Di Hotel X) Amanda Istianah Mutiawati; Eka Saputra
Jurnal Relasi Publik Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Mei : Jurnal Relasi Publik
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/jrp-widyakarya.v1i2.361

Abstract

Problems related to labor or labor are problems that often occur in developing countries, one of which is Indonesia. Termination of Employment (PHK) is something that is feared by workers due to economic conditions which have an impact on companies that have to go out of business and this results in unilateral layoffs by the company. One of the implementing regulations for the Job Creation Law that has been issued is Government Regulation Number 35 of 2021 concerning Work Agreements for Specific Periods, Outsourcing, Working Time, Work Relations and Rest Periods, and Termination of Employment (PHK). Article 15 states that employers are required to provide compensation money to workers or laborers whose employment relationship is based on a Specific Time Work Agreement (PKWT). Compensation money as referred to in Article 15 paragraph (1) PP Number 35 of 2021, is given to workers/laborers who have had continuous service for at least 1 (one) month. Compensation is everything that is received by workers, both physical and non-physical. The form of compensation given can be in the form of money or goods that are given directly or indirectly. Regulations regarding compensation are regulated in Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower and Government Regulation Number 35 of 2021 concerning Work Agreements for Specific Periods, Outsourcing, Working Time and Break Time and Termination of Employment. The compensation given by Hotel X to Mrs. S is in accordance with Article 16 of Government Regulation Number 35 of 2021 concerning Work Agreements for Specific Time, Outsourcing, Working Time and Break Time and Termination of Employment. Where Mrs. S demanded compensation from Hotel X with the calculation of the remaining salary withheld due to covid reasons, overtime pay, and leave money.
Analisis Kepesertaan Jaminan Sosial Ketenagakerjaan di Usaha Mikro dan Kecil Saputra, Eka; Amanda Istianah Mutiawati; Langga Langadhy
CEMERLANG : Jurnal Manajemen dan Ekonomi Bisnis Vol. 2 No. 4 (2022): CEMERLANG : Jurnal Manajemen dan Ekonomi Bisnis
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/cemerlang.v2i4.479

Abstract

Social Security employment is one of the government's programs to protect Indonesian workers because this is the mandate of Article 28H paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution, after which the government established Law No. 40 of 2004 concerning the National Social Security System and Law No. 24 of 2004 concerning the Social Security Organizing Agency. The regulations mentioned are an active form of the state to protect its people, one of which is from the labor sector. The authors took a study based on some of these rules by taking the title of the analysis of social security participation in employment for micro and small businesses. The formulation of this research problem is 1) what employment social security programs have been followed by job providers in micro and small businesses 2) What factors are the obstacles for job providers in micro and small businesses in participating in the employment social security program. This research is exploratory with a qualitative approach with research objects in small and small businesses, the use of data using primary and secondary data sources. The large number of participants who do not know and participate in BPJS Employment is an obstacle to the lack of participation of BPJS Employment.
“Analisis Pada Pekerja Yang Mengalami Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Karena Kesalahan Berat” Eka Saputra; Amanda Istianah Mutiawati
Jurnal Manajemen dan Ekonomi Kreatif Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Januari : Jurnal Manajemen dan Ekonomi Kreatif
Publisher : Universitas Kristen Indonesia Toraja

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (94.083 KB) | DOI: 10.59024/jumek.v1i1.27

Abstract

For employees and laborers in Indonesia, termination of employment is an inevitable fact, and laws regulating termination of employment are sought after in relation to the rights earned when termination happens. The worker's relationship with the employer may be terminated by the employer for reasons other than the worker's own actions or corporate decisions. For example, there are workers who are subject to termination because they committed an act of serious negligence and are still entitled to protection under the law. The issue at hand is how various termination-related legal laws have varying effects and how Law No. 11 of 2020 about Job Creation will modify the termination process and protection. The goal of this study is find out the laws and regulations governing termination and what are the legal instruments that support the rights of workers / workers affected by termination. This research uses exploratory qualitative methods using data through primary and secondary data sources. Based on the results of research, workers / workers get legal uncertainty regarding the rights obtained if they are terminated due to gross error.
Legal Review Relating To Cancellation of Arbitration Awards That Are Already Powerful (INKRACHT) and Final Related To Arbitration Law NO. 30 OF 1999 Concerning Arbitration Case Study PT. Krakatau Posco Against Indonesian National Arbitration Board, DKK at Serang State Court Muchamad Iksan Suryana; Driva Megantara; Amanda Istianah Mutiawati
Jurnal Silatene Sosial Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Maret
Publisher : Suwaib Amiruddin Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53611/fvxxsq18

Abstract

Pada penelitian ini, penulis membahas mengenai penetapan beberapa penyimpangan terkait pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase yang diatur dalam Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase dan Altenatif Penyelesiaan Sengketa. Pada kasus ini para pihak dan hakim sendiri cenderung mengabaikan keberadaan lembaga Arbitrase, perjanjian tidak adanya Klasula Arbitrase dianggap sebagai dokumen palsu dan tipu muslihat oleh Pemohon Arbitrase dikesampingan dengan berbagai argumentasi, dalam penelitian ini, penulis mengambil contoh pada Kasus antara PT. Krakatau Posco (Pemohon Arbitrase) melawan Badan Arbitrase Nasional (Termohon Arbitrase I) dan PT. Krakatau Enginering (Termohon Arbitrase II) pada Penetapan Nomor 105/Pdt.Arbt/2018/PN.Srg di Pengadilan Negeri Serang Kelas IA. Klasula Arbitrase dilakukan saat perjanjian kontrak akan dimulai antara kedua belah untuk menghindari terjadinya perselisihan sebelum atau sesudah apabila terjadi sengketa kedua belah pihak harus melakukan sengketa tersebut di lembaga Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia (BANI). Adapun permasalahan yang dibahas dalam tesis ini adalah mengenai Penetapan Nomor 105/Pdt.Arbt/2018/PN.Srg. tertanggal 21 September 2018, terhadap pertimbangan hakim yang dianggap tidak adanya Klasula Arbitrase dianggap sebagai dokumen palsu dan tipu muslihat. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam tesis ini adalah yuridis normatif dengan melalui pendekatan Undang-undang. Sumber yang digunakan yaitu berupa bahan hukum sekunder dengan teknik kepustakaan yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah Pembatalan putusan Arbitrase yang kabulkan oleh Majelis Hakim pada Pengadilan Negeri Serang Kelas IA didasarkan bahwa adanya tidak ada perjanjian Klasula Arbitrase di antara kedua belah pihak saat melalukan perjanjian tersebut.
Co-Authors Driva Megantara Eka Saputra Eka Saputra Langga Langadhy Muchamad Iksan Suryana