Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PEMBERIAN SANKSI KEPADA HAKIM SEBAGAI PENEGAK HUKUM YANG MELANGGAR KODE ETIK Tsabitha, Tanissa Mayra; Lesmana, Idham Putra; Ramdhani, Dwi Sukma; Hidayat, Erika Maharani; Hezron, Alessandro Christoper Max; Saly, Jeane neltje
Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Vol 9 No 20 (2023): Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan
Publisher : Peneliti.net

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8437436

Abstract

This article now the content of the ethics rules for judges, which apply to sanction violations of every Code of Ethics. The technique selected by the author is a normative injunction research method that polestar on the study of legal norms. One of the infraction of the Code of Professional Decency affairs the profession of judges, whichever is reflected in the oversight of judges, which is catalogued in Article 1, Item 6, of Law No. 18 of 2011 on Respect and Obedience to Judicial Conduct. A code of ethics is a set of rules and principles that govern the conduct and burden of professionals in the legal field. The Code of Ethics is calculated to ensure that they carry out their work alongside a high degree of responsibility, integrity, honor and probity. However, unprofessional conduct persists, with in the court.
Construction of Criminal Liability in Single Indictment of Obstruction of Justice under the Corruption Law Ramdhani, Dwi Sukma; Adhari, Ade
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.380

Abstract

This study examines obstruction of justice in Indonesia’s positive law as well as criminal liability in the application of single charges based on the Corruption Law. With normative juridical methods through legislative and case approaches, the research analyzes primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study show that Indonesian law does not yet have a comprehensive definition of obstruction of justice, thus opening up a wide space for interpretation. The application of a single indictment in corruption cases also creates legal uncertainty, especially in proving the element of “obstructing the legal process” when the act is closely related to the main offense. This study emphasizes the need for harmonization of norms and a clearer formulation of criminal offenses to increase the effectiveness of obstruction of justice as an instrument for eradicating corruption.