Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Metode Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab di Pondok Salaf dan Pondok Modern di Kota Salatiga Chakim, Lutfi
Arabia Vol 15, No 1 (2023): JURNAL ARABIA
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Fakultas Tarbiyah IAIN Kudus

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/arabia.v15i1.15094

Abstract

This study aims to determine the method of learning Arabic in the Salaf and Modern islamic boarding school in Salatiga City. The two Islamic boarding school that are the object of research are Hidayatul Mubtadi'in in the Kalibening sub-district and Pondok Modern Asy-Syurkati in the Sideorejo Lor sub-district, Salatiga City, a small city in Central Java that became the most tolerant city in Indonesia according to the Setara Institude version in 2020. This includes identifying what became the target of the two boarding school in teaching Arabic and what programs were used to achieve it. This research is a qualitative research, through case studies using interview, observation and documentation techniques with data analysis using interactive analysis. From this research, it was found that Pondok Hidayatul Mubtadi'in which has a salaf pattern applies two learning models, namely, memorizing Arabic qowaid (grammatical and morphological) and applying it in the study of Arabic books, so the method used is the method of rules and translation. Meanwhile, Pondok Asy-Syurkati, which has a modern style, applies several learning models in addition to memorizing qawaid, but also applies a dialogue model (muhadatsah), adding vocabulary with certain themes and using audiovisuals where students learn Arabic from native speakers. Thus Pondok Asy-Syurkati uses several Arabic language learning methods, namely the rule and translation method, the direct method (thoriqoh mubasyaroh), the Mim-Mem method (mimicry and memorization) and the audiolingual method.
FATWA, AUTHORITY, AND DIGITAL TRADE: A Critical Legal-Discursive Analysis of Dropshipping Rulings in Indonesia and Egypt Chakim, Lutfi; Hidayah, Nur; Hasanudin, Hasanudin
Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Vol 16, No 1 (2025): Jurisdictie
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j.v16i1.31882

Abstract

The development of the digital economy, which has given rise to new business models such as dropshipping, has sparked legal debates within Islam. This paper explores the legal and institutional dynamics shaping Islamic legal responses to dropshipping in the digital economy by conducting a comparative fatwa analysis between DSN-MUI (Indonesia) and Dār al-Iftā’ al-Miṣrīyah (Egypt). While both institutions seek to maintain Shariah integrity, their divergent conclusions DSN-MUI’s permissibility under a salam contract versus Dār al-Iftā’ al-Miṣrīyah ’s rejection under a murabahah framework reveal deeper ideological and contextual distinctions. Using critical constructivist discourse analysis, the study examines how fatwas reflect legal reasoning, power relations, regulatory objectives, and ideological orientations of fatwa-issuing bodies. The findings highlight the pluralism in Islamic economic jurisprudence and underscore the importance of contextual and policy-sensitive interpretations of Shariah in the evolving digital economy. The paper concludes with policy implications that advocate for empirical validation, cross-jurisdictional engagement, and doctrinally grounded innovation in contemporary fiqh al-muamalat. This study reveals the pluralism of dropshipping fatwa and the importance of contextual approaches and empirical validation in the development of Islamic economic fiqh in the digital era. Perkembangan ekonomi digital melahirkan model bisnis baru seperti dropshipping telah memunculkan perdebatan hukum dalam Islam. Penelitian ini mengeksplorasi dinamika hukum dan kelembagaan yang membentuk respons hukum Islam terhadap dropshipping dalam ekonomi digital dengan melakukan analisis fatwa komparatif antara DSN-MUI (Indonesia) dan Dār al-Iftā’ al-Miṣrīyah (Mesir). Sementara kedua lembaga berusaha untuk menjaga integritas Syariah, kesimpulan mereka yang berbeda izin DSN-MUI di bawah kontrak salam versus penolakan Dār al-Iftā’ al-Miṣrīyah di bawah kerangka murabahah mengungkapkan perbedaan ideologis dan kontekstual yang lebih dalam. Dengan menggunakan analisis wacana konstruktivis kritis, penelitian ini meneliti bagaimana fatwa tidak hanya mencerminkan penalaran hukum tetapi juga relasi kekuasaan, tujuan peraturan, dan orientasi ideologis badan penerbit fatwa. Temuan ini menyoroti pluralisme dalam yurisprudensi ekonomi Islam dan menggarisbawahi pentingnya interpretasi Syariah kontekstual dan sensitif kebijakan dalam ekonomi digital yang berkembang. Makalah ini menyimpulkan dengan implikasi kebijakan yang mengadvokasi validasi empiris, keterlibatan lintas yurisdiksi, dan inovasi yang didasarkan secara doktrin dalam fiqh al-muamalat kontemporer. Studi ini mengungkap pluralisme fatwa dropshipping dan pentingnya pendekatan kontekstual serta validasi empiris dalam pengembangan fiqh ekonomi Islam era digital.