Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM INDONESIA SEBAGAI PERLINDUNGAN BAGI INVESTOR DI TENGAH FENOMENA INVESTASI BODONG Bloude, Bastian; Ratnawati, Elfrida
Ensiklopedia of Journal Vol 6, No 2 (2024): Vol. 6 No. 2 Edisi 1 Januari 2024
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/eoj.v6i2.2069

Abstract

The proliferation of fraudulent investments causing substantial losses to the general public in Indonesia has prompted the Indonesian government to take action through legislative and central government bodies to enact Law Number 4 of 2023 on the Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector. This legislation aims to address the need for legal reform in certain provisions of the financial sector that are considered outdated and no longer accommodating current technological advancements and investment practices in Indonesia, particularly in the trading of cryptocurrencies as commodities. The establishment of this law also serves as a response to safeguard investors engaging in investment practices or capital investment in Indonesia. In executing this research, the primary objective is to determine whether the legal reforms undertaken by the Indonesian government can provide legal protection to investors in Indonesia amid the fraudulent investment phenomenon. This study is conducted through a normative research approach with a descriptive methodology to illustrate how Law Number 4 of 2023 can offer legal protection to investors in Indonesia. The research relies on secondary data sources obtained from the law itself, books from the library, and scholarly journals accessed through the internet. The conclusions drawn from this research follow a deductive method.Keywords: Legal Protection, Fraudulent Investments, Financial Services Authority
TINJAUAN YURIDIS KECAKAPAN BERTINDAK PARA PIHAK DALAM PERJANJIAN UTANG-PIUTANG (STUDI PERJANJIAN PADA ERICKO CHANIAGO DENGAN PT. BCA FINANCE DAN CV. TRIJAYA MAKMUR SEJAHTERA) Bloude, Bastian; Indiraharti, Novina Sri
Tribuere Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/trb.v1i2.20091

Abstract

In an agreement, must pay attention to the provisions of Article 1320 of the Civil Code, one of the conditions is the acting skills of the parties when making the agreement. In this case, there was an agreement which, at the time it was made, one of the parties was not competent in carrying out legal acts, which conducted by Ericko Chaniago with PT BCA Finance and CV Trijaya Makmur Sejahtera. The problem in this research is: how is a person's maturity regulated as a condition for the validity of their ability to act in making an agreement? and whether the agreement made between Ericko Chaniago and PT BCA Finance and CV Trijaya Makmur Sejahtera meets the requirements for the validity of the agreement, especially regarding the element of the parties' acting skills? The method used in this research is a normative juridical method, using secondary data as the main data, in the form of primary legal materials, namely using statutory regulations and secondary materials in the form of literature, processing is carried out qualitatively and conclusions are drawn deductively. The results of this research concluded, that a person's maturity in Indonesian laws and regulations varies, in the Civil Code, a person's maturity is 21 (twenty one) years, but Indonesian law recognizes that a person's maturity is 18 (eighteen) years, one of which is as intended in the Notary Position Law, and it was found that the agreement made by Ericko Chaniago with PT BCA Finance did not meet the elements of acting skill of the parties, because Ericko Chaniago was still under 21 (twenty one) years of age, while for the agreement between Ericko Chaniago and CV Trijaya Makmur Sejahtera had fulfilled the requirements for the parties' acting skills, but it was found that there was a violation of other conditions, namely the existence of unlawful causes in the agreement.